Skip to main content

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty: How to Avoid Conversion to Penetrating Keratoplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Keratoconus

Abstract

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty involves removal of the damaged corneal stroma retaining the patient’s healthy Descemet’s membrane (DM) and endothelium, reducing the risk of rejection and endothelial cell loss, with a consequent longer graft survival. It is a technically more challenging and time-consuming procedure with a deep learning curve. To be perfectly performed, DALK demands greater surgeon experience and skills than penetrating keratoplasty (PK), due to difficulty in separating stroma from the DM without perforating it, avoiding the conversion to PK. Improvements in the technique and the knowledge acquired in recent years help increase the successful rates. Technologies, proper instruments, and surgeon training are helpful to achieve deeper depth cleavages and the big-bubble formation, as well as perform other surgical steps successfully. Rescue techniques should be known in the event of perforation, trying to keep the advantages of DALK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sarnicola V, Toro P, Gentile D, Hannush SB. Descemetic DALK and predescemetic DALK: outcomes in 236 cases of keratoconus. Cornea. 2010;29(1):53–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet’s membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:398–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Manche EE, Holland GN, Maloney RK. Deep lamellar keratoplasty using viscoelastic dissection. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(11):1561–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parker JS, van Dijk K, Melles GRJ. Treatment options for advanced keratoconus: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015;60(5):459–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.02.004.

  5. Noble BA, Agrawal A, Collins C, Saldana M, Brogden PR, Zuberbuhler B. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK): visual outcome and complications for a heterogeneous group of corneal pathologies. Cornea. 2007;26(1):59–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kodavoor SK, Deb B, Ramamurthy D. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty outcomes in macular and granular corneal dystrophy—a comparative cross-sectional study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67(11):1830–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sarnicola E, Sarnicola C, Sabatino F, Tosi GM, Perri P, Sarnicola V. Early deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for Acanthamoeba keratitis poorly responsive to medical treatment. Cornea. 2016;35(1):1639–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.228.

  8. Sabatino F, Sarnicola E, Sarnicola C, Tosi GM, Perri P, Sarnicola V. Early deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for fungal keratitis poorly responsive to medical treatment. Eye. 2017;31(12):1639–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Luengo-Gimeno F, Tan DT, Mehta JS. Evolution of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Ocul Surf. 2011;9(2):98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1542-0124(11)70017-9.

  10. Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Deep lamellar keratoplasty: surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet’s membrane. Cornea. 2002;21(4):374–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugita J, Kondo J. Deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete removal of pathological stroma for vision improvement. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(3):184–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsubota K, Kaido M, Monden Y, Satake Y, Bissen-Miyajima H, Shimazaki J. A new surgical technique for deep lamellar keratoplasty with single running suture adjustment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(1):1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Melles GRJ, Lander F, Rietveld FJR, Remeijer L, Beekhuis WH, Binder PS. A new surgical technique for deep stromal, anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(3):327–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Arenas E, Esquenazi S, Anwar M, Terry M. Lamellar corneal transplantation. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57(6):510–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.01.009.

  15. Sarnicola E, Sarnicola C, Sabatino F, Tosi GM, Perri P, Sarnicola V. Cannula DALK versus needle DALK for keratoconus. Cornea. 2016;35(12):1508–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghanem R, Ghanem M. Pachymetry-guided intrastromal air injection (“pachy-bubble”) for deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2012;31(9):1087–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Price FW, Price MO, Grandin JC, Kwon R. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with femtosecond-laser zigzag incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(5):804–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.011.

  18. Farid M, Steinert RF. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty performed with the femtosecond laser zigzag incision for the treatment of stromal corneal pathology and ectatic disease. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(5):809–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.012.

  19. Borderie VM, Sandali O, Bullet J, Gaujoux T, Touzeau O, Laroche L. Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):249–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.057.

  20. Romano V, Iovieno A, Parente G, Soldani AM, Fontana L. Long-term clinical outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(3):505–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.11.033.

  21. Sarnicola V, Toro P, Sarnicola C, Sarnicola E, Ruggiero A. Long-term graft survival in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2012;31(6):621–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Borderie VM, Boëlle PY, Touzeau O, Allouch C, Boutboul S, Laroche L. Predicted long-term outcome of corneal transplantation. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2354–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.009.

  23. Borderie VM, Werthel AL, Touzeau O, Allouch C, Boutboul S, Laroche L. Comparison of techniques used for removing the recipient stroma in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(1):31–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guilbert E, Bullet J, Sandali O, Basli E, Laroche L, Borderie VM. Long-term rejection incidence and reversibility after penetrating and lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(3):560–569.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.09.027.

  25. Reinhart WJ, Musch DC, Jacobs DS, Lee WB, Kaufman SC, Shtein RM. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(1):209–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.11.002.

  26. Mathur V, Parihar JK, Srivastava VK, Avasthi A. Clinical evaluation of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for stromal corneal opacities. Med J Armed Forces India. 2013;69(1):21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khattak A, Nakhli FR, Al-Arfaj KM, Cheema AA. Comparison of outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty performed in a large group of patients with keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(3):985–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Borderie VM, Guilbert E, Touzeau O, Laroche L. Graft rejection and graft failure after anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(6):1024–1029.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.007.

  29. Fontana L, Parente G, Tassinari G. Clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):117–24.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tan DTH, Dart JKG, Holland EJ, Kinoshita S. Corneal transplantation. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1749–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60437-1.

  31. Donoso R, Díaz C, Villavicencio P. Comparative study of keratoconus between Anwar’s deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus converted penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2015;90(6):257–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ünal M, Bilgin B, Yucel I, Akar Y, Apaydin C. Conversion to deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK): learning curve with big-bubble technique. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(6):642–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hos D, Matthaei M, Bock F, Maruyama K, Notara M, Clahsen T, et al. Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;73:100768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.001.

  34. Myerscough J, Bovone C, Mimouni M, Elkadim M, Rimondi E, Busin M. Factors predictive of double anterior chamber formation following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;205:11–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.03.026.

  35. Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Koreishi A, Ide T, Goldman D, Karp CL, et al. Femtosecond laser–assisted sutureless anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(8):1303–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Amayem AF, Anwar M. Fluid lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(1):76–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Francesconi CM, Forseto AS, Nosé RM, Nosé W. Ceratoplastia lamelar profunda com viscodissecção da membrana de Descemet. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2001;64(5):385–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chua AWY, Chua MJ, Kam PCA. Recent advances and anaesthetic considerations in corneal transplantation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018;46(2):162–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nanavaty MA, Vijjan KS, Yvon C. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a surgeon’s guide. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018;30(4):297–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2018.06.004.

  40. Prazeres TMB, Muller R, Rayes T, Hirai F, De Souza LB. Comparison of Descemet-on versus Descemet-off deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus patients: a randomized trial. Cornea. 2015;34(7):797–801.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sarnicola E, Sarnicola C, Cheung AY, Panico E, Panico C, Sarnicola V. Manual deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty after partial unintentional full-thickness trephination. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;31(2):774–7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Riss S, Heindl LM, Bachmann BO, Kruse FE, Cursiefen C. Pentacam-based big bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2012;31(6):627–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Steven P, Le Blanc C, Lankenau E, Krug M, Oelckers S, Heindl LM, et al. Optimising deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using intraoperative online optical coherence tomography (iOCT). Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(7):900–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu YC, Wittwer VV, Yusoff NZBM, Lwin CN, Seah XY, Mehta JS, et al. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography–guided femtosecond laser–assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2019;38(5):648–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. De Benito-Llopis L, Mehta JS, Angunawela RI, Ang M, Tan DTH. Intraoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography: a novel assessment tool during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(2):334–341.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.10.001.

  46. Myerscough J, Bovone C, Scorcia V, Ricci-Filipovic B, Leon P, Mimouni M, et al. Deep trephination allows high rates of successful pneumatic dissection for DALK independent of surgical experience. Cornea. 2019;38(5):645–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pasricha ND, Shieh C, Carrasco-Zevallos OM, Keller B, Cunefare D, Mehta JS, et al. Needle depth and big-bubble success in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: an ex vivo microscope-integrated OCT study. Cornea. 2016;35(11):1471–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Dua HS, Faraj LA, Said DG, Gray T, Lowe J. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmology. 2013;120(9):1778–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dua HS, Faraj LA, Kenawy MB, AlTaan S, Elalfy MS, Katamish T, et al. Dynamics of big bubble formation in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty by the big bubble technique: in vitro studies. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(1):69–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dua HS, Katamish T, Said DG, Faraj LA. Differentiating type 1 from type 2 big bubbles in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1155–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Abdelkader A, Kaufman HE. Descemetic versus pre-descemetic lamellar keratoplasty: clinical and confocal study. Cornea. 2011;30(11):1244–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ghanem RC, Bogoni A, Ghanem VC. Pachymetry-guided intrastromal air injection (“pachy-bubble”) for deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: results of the first 110 cases. Cornea. 2015;34(6):625–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schiano-Lomoriello D, Colabelli-Gisoldi RA, Nubile M, Oddone F, Ducoli G, Villani CM, et al. Descemetic and predescemetic DALK in keratoconus patients: a clinical and confocal perspective study. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:123156.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Singh NP, Said DG, Dua HS. Lamellar keratoplasty techniques. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(9):1239–50.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Huang T, Hu Y, Gui M, Hou C, Zhang H. Comparison of refractive outcomes in three corneal transplantation techniques for keratoconus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(11):1947–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fontana L, Parente G, Sincich A, Tassinari G. Influence of graft–host interface on the quality of vision after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2011;30(5):497–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Huang OS, Htoon HM, Chan AM, Tan D, Mehta JS. Incidence and outcomes of intraoperative Descemet membrane perforations during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;199:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.10.026.

  58. de Macedo JP, dos Santos Forseto A, Allemann N, de Sousa LB. Avaliação da ceratoplastia lamelar anterior profunda em pacientes com ceratocone. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009;72(4):486–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Coster DJ, Lowe MT, Keane MC, Williams KA. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(5):979–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.017.

  60. Feizi S, Javadi MA, Jamali H, Mirbabaee F. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus: big-bubble technique. Cornea. 2010;29(2):177–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kubaloglu A, Sari ES, Unal M, Koytak A, Kurnaz E, Cinar Y, et al. Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(5):760–767.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.020.

  62. Jones MNA, Armitage WJ, Ayliffe W, Larkin DF, Kaye SB. Penetrating and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: a comparison of graft outcomes in the United Kingdom. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(12):5625–9.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gadhvi KA, Romano V, Fernández-Vega Cueto L, Aiello F, Day AC, Allan BD. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus: multisurgeon results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;201:54–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Myerscough J, Friehmann A, Bovone C, Mimouni M, Busin M. Evaluation of the risk factors associated with conversion of intended deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty to penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(6):764–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Michieletto P, Balestrazzi A, Balestrazzi A, Mazzotta C, Occhipinti I, Rossi T. Factors predicting unsuccessful big bubble deep lamellar anterior keratoplasty. Ophthalmologica. 2006;220(6):379–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Borderie VM, Touhami S, Georgeon C, Sandali O. Predictive factors for successful type 1 big bubble during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:4685406.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Vajpayee RB, Ed F, Maharana PK, Sharma N. Diamond knife–assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty to manage keratoconus. J Cart Refract Surg. 2020;40(2):276–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.047.

  68. Sarnicola V, Toro P. Blunt cannula for descemetic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30(8):895–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Muftuoglu O, Toro P, Hogan RN, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP, et al. Sarnicola air-visco bubble technique in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2013;32(4):527–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Scorcia V, De Luca V, Lucisano A, Bruzzichessi D, Balestrieri M, Soda M, et al. Comparison of corneal densitometry between big-bubble and visco-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(3):336–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Myerscough J, Roberts H, Yu AC, Elkadim M, Bovone C, Busin M. 5-year outcomes of converted mushroom keratoplasty from intended DALK mandate 9mm diameter DALK as the optimal approach to keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;220:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.07.009.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

dos Santos Forseto, A., Sampaio, L.M.M.P.P. (2022). Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty: How to Avoid Conversion to Penetrating Keratoplasty. In: Almodin, E., Nassaralla, B.A., Sandes, J. (eds) Keratoconus . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85361-7_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85361-7_78

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85360-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85361-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics