Skip to main content

Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation for Early Keratoconus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Keratoconus
  • 554 Accesses

Abstract

In the last two decades, the widespread use of corneal tomography and the growing attention to risk factors like eye allergies, eye rubbing, sleeping on the eyes, and others have turned into game changers when evaluating patients with keratoconus.

Meanwhile, the dissemination of femtosecond laser devices and the development of new innovative treatment options have constituted huge advances in the therapeutics of the disease. In the case of intrastromal ring segments, for a growing number of corneal specialists, their implantation has been converted into the most simple, effective, and safest option to treat symptomatic keratoconus patients with contact lens intolerance. With the spreading of this technique, refinement of results has followed, driven by attentive manufacturers committed to improve the technology by presenting new segment options and nomograms more directed to face different subtypes of ectasia, which, in a virtuous circle, fed an increase on its popularity. It was in this collaborative environment between industry, researchers, and surgeons that intrastromal segments have started being used in more challenging cases like the less symptomatic and more demanding patients with early ectasia.

This chapter starts with an analysis of different therapeutic approaches used in early keratoconus. Next, essential aspects of the implantation of intrastromal segments on this specific population are discussed in relation to the patient, the surgeon, the surgical planning, and the effects on visual acuity, ametropia, and optical aberrations. The stabilization of ectasia, the possibility of reoperations, the reversibility of intervention, additional procedures, and related adverse effects are also examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Coskunseven E, Kymionis GD, Tsiklis NS, Atun S, Arslan E, Siganos CS, et al. Complications of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation using a femtosecond laser for channel creation: a survey of 850 eyes with keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89(1):54–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01605.x.

  2. Ferrara P, Torquetti L. Ferrara ring: an overview. CRSTEurope. https://crstodayeurope.com/articles/2009-oct/1009_04-php/. Accessed 11 Jul 2020.

  3. Medghalchi A, Moghadam RS, Akbari M, Alizadeh Y, Soltanipour S, Veisi H, et al. Correlation of corneal elevations measured by Scheimpflug corneal imaging with severity of keratoconus. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019;31(4):377–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Belin MW, Duncan JK. Keratoconus: the ABCD grading system. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2016;233(6):701–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodrigues PF, Dias WG. Intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation in patients with mild keratoconus. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2014;3(3):122–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang XH, Li X. Effect of rigid gas permeable contact lens on keratoconus progression: a review. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(7):1124–31. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2020.07.17.

  7. Jacob S, Patel SR, Agarwal A, Ramalingam A, Saijimol AI, Michael Raj J. Corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments (CAIRS) combined with corneal cross-linking for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2018;34(5):296–303.

    Google Scholar 

  8. CAIRS better than ICRS? eyeonoptics. http://eyeonoptics.com/articles/archive/cairs-better-than-icrs/. Accessed 10 Jul 2020.

  9. Karseras AG, Ruben M. Aetiology of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol. 1976;60(7):522–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wollensak G, Spörl E, Seiler T. Behandlung von Keratokonus durch Kollagenvernetzung. Ophthalmologe. 2003;100(1):44–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koller T, Mrochen M, Seiler T. Complication and failure rates after corneal crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(8):1358–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Almeida Ferreira G, Coral Ghanem V, Coral Ghanem R. Late progressive corneal flattening, haze and visual loss after eccentric crosslinking for pellucid marginal degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020;18:100621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma A, Nottage JM, Mirchia K, Sharma R, Mohan K, Nirankari VS. Persistent corneal edema after collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(6):922–6.e1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dhawan S, Rao K, Natrajan S. Complications of corneal collagen cross-linking. J Ophthalmol. 2011;2011:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore JE, Schiroli D, Moore CBT. Potential effects of corneal cross-linking upon the limbus. BioMed Research International. 2016;2016:5062064. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5062064.

  16. Oliphant H, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Shalaby Bardan A, Vasquez-Perez A, O’Brart D, Liu C. Corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: primum non nocere. Eye. 2018;32:4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.256.

  17. Jarstad JS. High-dose dietary riboflavin and sunlight treatment of keratoconus and ectasia. Presented at the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2018 Annual Meeting; Washington, DC; 13–17 Apr 2018. https://ascrs.confex.com/ascrs/18am/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/42553. Accessed 8 Sep 2020.

  18. Topographic corneal changes induced by oral riboflavin in the treatment of corneal ectasia [abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2018;59:1413. https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2689856. Accessed 8 Sep 2020.

  19. Al-Mohaimeed MM. Combined corneal CXL and photorefractive keratectomy for treatment of keratoconus: a review. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12:1929–38. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.12.16.

  20. Kanellopoulos AJ. Comparison of sequential vs same-day simultaneous collagen cross-linking and topography-guided PRK for treatment of keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(9):S812–8. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20090813-10.

  21. Althomali T. Visual and refractive outcomes of combined excimer laser ablation with accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking in subclinical keratoconus. Saudi J Heal Sci. 2018;7(1):7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carriazo C, Cosentino MJ. A novel corneal remodeling technique for the management of keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(12):854–6.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carriazo C, Cosentino MJ. Long-term outcomes of a new surgical technique for corneal remodeling in corneal ectasia. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(4):261–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dioptex. MyoRing. https://www.dioptex.com/products/myoring.html. Accessed 29 Aug 2020.

  25. Daxer A. Adjustable intracorneal ring in a lamellar pocket for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(3):217–21.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Daxer A, Mahmoud H, Venkateswaran RS. Intracorneal continuous ring implantation for keratoconus: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(8):1296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alshammari YS, Al Somali AI. Outcomes of MyoRing implantation in eyes with keratoconus in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia: “a single-arm cohort study”. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019(3):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Janani L, Jadidi K, Mosavi S, Nejat F, Naderi M, Nourijelyani K. MyoRing implantation in keratoconic patients: 3 years follow-up data. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(1):26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nasrollahi K, Rezaei L, Ghoreishi M, Kashfi A, Mahboubi M. Clinical outcomes of MyoRing implantation in keratoconic eyes by using the femtosecond laser technology. J Med Life. 2015;8(Spec Iss 3):66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pathak AK, Gonzalez AJV, Karacal H. ICRS: corneal biomechanics effects Eyewiki. https://eyewiki.aao.org/ICRS%3A_Corneal_biomechanics_effects. Accessed 30 Aug 2020.

  31. El-Moatassem Kotb AM, Hantera M. Efficacy and safety of Intacs SK in moderate to severe keratoconus. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013;20:46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kang MJ, Byun YS, Yoo YS, Whang WJ, Joo CK. Long-term outcome of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus: five-year follow up. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Siganos D, Ferrara P, Chatzinikolas K, Bessis N, Papastergiou G. Ferrara intrastromal corneal rings for the correction of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(11):1947–51.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lipner M. Peak efforts in keratoconus. Eyeworld. 2013;Nov:43–4. https://digital.eyeworld.org/i/220233-nov-2013/44?. Accessed 30 Aug 2020.

  35. Torquetti L, Sandes J. Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2016;5(3):114–27.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Izquierdo L, Mejías Smith JA, Lievano JR, Sarquis R, Henriquez MA. Modification of the intrastromal ring position according to postimplant visual and refractive failure: report of two cases. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2019;2019:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Alfonso JF, Lisa C, Merayo-Lloves J, Fernández-Vega Cueto L, Montés-Micó R. Intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in paracentral keratoconus with coincident topographic and coma axis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(9):1576–82.

    Google Scholar 

  38. de Araujo BS, Kubo L, Marinho DR, Kwitko S. Keratoconus progression after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation according to age: 5-year follow-up cohort study. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(11):2847–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Boyd K. What is keratoconus? American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://www.aao.org/eye-health/diseases/what-is-keratoconus. Accessed 23 Aug 2020.

  40. Torquetti L. How to choose the ICRS. Ferrara Ophthalmics. https://ferrararing.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/How-to-choose-the-ICRS-BRASCRS2018-LTORQUETTI.pdf. Accessed 8 Dec 2020.

  41. Keraring online. http://keraring.online/. Accessed 4 Sep 2020.

  42. Yebra-Pimentel E, González-Jéijome JM, Cerviño A, Giráldez MJ, González-Pérez J, Parafita MA. Corneal asphericity in a young adult population. Clinical implications. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2004;79(8):385–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Torquetti L. Corneal asphericity changes after implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus. J Emmetropia. 2010;1:178–81.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Alfonso JF, Cueto LFV, Baamonde B, Merayo-Lloves J, Madrid-Costa D, Montés-Micó R. Inferior intrastromal corneal ring segments in paracentral keratoconus with no coincident topographic and coma axis. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(4):266–72.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vega-Estrada A, Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB. Keratoconus progression after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in young patients: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(6):1145–52.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Alio JL, Vega-Estrada A, Esperanza S, Barraquer RI, Teus MA, Murta J. Intrastromal corneal ring segments: how successful is the surgical treatment of keratoconus? Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014;21(1):3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Piñero DP, Alio JL, Teus MA, Barraquer RI, Uceda-Montañés A. Modeling the intracorneal ring segment effect in keratoconus using refractive, keratometric, and corneal aberrometric data. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(11):5583–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Torquetti L, Berbel RF, Ferrara P. Long-term follow-up of intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(10):1768–73.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Coskunseven E, Kymionis GD, Tsiklis NS, Atun S, Arslan E, Jankov MR, et al. One-year results of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation (Keraring) using femtosecond laser in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(5):775–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sakellaris D, Balidis M, Gorou O, Szentmary N, Alexoudis A, Grieshaber MC, et al. Intracorneal ring segment implantation in the management of keratoconus: an evidence-based approach. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8:5–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-00211-2.

  51. Applegate RA, Sarver EJ, Khemsara V. Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg. 2002;18(5):S556–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Puell MC, Carballo-Álvarez J. Forward light scatter and visual acuity before and after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation at different stages of keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(8):e738–43.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Saif SMA, Mekky MA. Corneal higher order aberrations after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus. Delta J Ophthalmol. 2020;21(1):19.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Paranhos JDFS, Ávila MP, Paranhos A, Schor P. Evaluation of the impact of intracorneal ring segments implantation on the quality of life of patients with keratoconus using the NEI-RQL (National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life) instrument. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(1):101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bautista-Llamas MJ, Sánchez-González MC, López-Izquierdo I, López-Muñoz A, Gargallo-Martínez B, De-Hita-Cantalejo C, et al. Complications and explantation reasons in intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation: a systematic review. J Refract Surg. 2019;35:740–51.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Piñero DP, Alio JL, Kady B El, Coskunseven E, Morbelli H, Uceda-Montanes A, et al. Refractive and aberrometric outcomes of intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus: mechanical versus femtosecond-assisted procedures. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(9):1675–87.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chalita MR, Krueger RR. Wavefront aberrations associated with the Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring in a keratoconic eye. J Refract Surg. 2004;20(6):823–30.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yildirim A, Uslu H, Kara N, Ozgurhan EB. Treatment of visual problems after intracorneal ring implantation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1251.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chan K, Hersh PS. Removal and repositioning of intracorneal ring segments: improving corneal topography and clinical outcomes in keratoconus and ectasia. Cornea. 2017;36(2):244–8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ibares Frias L, Gallego P, Martinez-Garcia C, Cantalapiedra R, Blanco T, Merayo-Loves J. Clinical and histological reversibility of intracorneal ring segment surgery: final results [abstract]. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88(s246). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.321.x.

  61. Asbell P, Uçakhan O, Abbot R, Assil K, Burris T, Durrie D, et al. Intrastomal corneal ring segments: reversibility of refractive effect. J Refract Surg. 2001;17(1):25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Torquetti L, Feirara G, Almeida F, Cunha L, Ferrara P, Merayo-Lloves J. Clinical outcomes after intrastromal corneal ring segments reoperation in keratoconus patients. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;6(6):796–800.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Benoist D’Azy C, Pereira B, Chiambaretta F, Dutheil F. Efficacy of different procedures of intra-corneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(3):38.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Alió JL, Toffaha BT, Piñero DP, Klonowski P, Javaloy J. Cross-linking in progressive keratoconus using an epithelial debridement or intrastromal pocket technique after previous corneal ring segment implantation. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(10):737–43.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kiliç A, Kamburoglu G, Akinci A. Riboflavin injection into the corneal channel for combined collagen crosslinking and intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(5):878–83.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Coskunseven E, Jankov MR, Grentzelos MA, Plaka AD, Limnopoulou AN, Kymionis GD. Topography-guided transepithelial PRK after intracorneal ring segments implantation and corneal collagen CXL in a three-step procedure for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(1):54–8.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Iovieno A, Légaré ME, Rootman DB, Yeung SN, Kim P, Rootman DS. Intracorneal ring segments implantation followed by same-day photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(12):915–8.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Alió JL, Peña-García P, Abdulla GF, Zein G, Abu-Mustafa SK. Comparison of iris-claw and posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lenses in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(3):383–94.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Coşkunseven E, Sharma DP, Jankov MR, Kymionis GD, Richoz O, Hafezi F. Collagen copolymer toric phakic intraocular lens for residual myopic astigmatism after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation and corneal collagen crosslinking in a 3-stage procedure for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(5):722–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fridman, D. (2022). Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation for Early Keratoconus. In: Almodin, E., Nassaralla, B.A., Sandes, J. (eds) Keratoconus . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85361-7_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85361-7_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85360-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85361-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics