Skip to main content

Behavioural Ecology of the Little Bustard: Sexual Selection and Mating Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Little Bustard: Ecology and Conservation

Part of the book series: Wildlife Research Monographs ((WIREMO,volume 5))

  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we focus mainly on the behavioural ecology of the little bustard (i.e. how behaviour relates to ecology and evolution), with particular emphasis on breeding behaviour, sexual selection and mating systems, as well as their relevance for little bustard conservation. We discuss the evolutionary forces that drive the species’ lekking behaviour and its variations under the framework of sexual selection theory. We also discuss other less studied aspects of little bustard behavioural ecology (sperm competition, personality traits, and parent–offspring conflicts). The little bustard mating system is described in most localities as an exploded lek strategy but can be quite flexible, and a variety of situations ranging from resource-based monogamy to classical leks have been suggested. Several non-exclusive theoretical models of lek formation have been proposed and are all consistent, to some degree, with the little bustard’s lekking behaviour. However, two models (hotshot and black hole) seem particularly appropriate to describe the little bustard mating system at different spatial scales. On larger scales, female mobility and harassment by individual males may induce male aggregation as described by the black hole mechanism. At smaller scales, female preference for particularly attractive males (hotshot) or certain lek sizes may induce an initial clustering, which would be further maintained and structured as a result of the hotshot mechanism. Overall, the female choice seems to be based on multiple criteria (male snort call rate, plumage traits and displays). Habitat quality and resources within male territories are variable, and evidence suggests that these determine male settlement, but no evidence supports a decisive role in mate choice. Evidence regarding sperm competition in little bustard is scarce as well as contradictory. The apparently long time elapsing between mating and laying would allow for potential cryptic female choice through sperm competition, but the apparently low rate of copulation suggests that sperm competition might not be intense in little bustards. Evidence from decoy experiments and observations suggests that male and female little bustard behaviours (displays, behaviour during captures) are variable but consistent (repeatable) within individuals and may define individual personalities. These aspects of little bustard behaviour, and their relevance for conservation, also deserve further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behaviour in acoustic insects. In: Pimentel D (ed) Insects, science and society. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso JC, Alonso JA, Martín E, Morales MB (1998) Proximate and ultimate causes of natal dispersal in the great bustard, Otis tarda. Behav Ecol 9:243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso JC, Morales MB, Alonso JA (2000) Partial migration, lek fidelity and nesting area fidelity in female great bustards Otis tarda. Condor 102:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso JC, Martín CA, Alonso JA, Palacín C, Magaña M, Lane SJ (2004) Distribution dynamics of a great bustard metapopulation throughout a decade: influence of conspecific attraction and recruitment. Biodivers Conserv 13:1659–1674

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso JC, Alvarez-Martinez JM, Palacín C (2012) Leks in ground-displaying birds : hotspots or safe places ? Behav Ecol 23:491–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso JC, Martín E, Morales MB, Alonso JA (2018) Sibling competition and not maternal allocation drives differential offspring feeding in a sexually size-dimorphic bird. Anim Behav 137:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Balenger SL, Zuk M (2014) Testing the Hamilton–Zuk hypothesis: past, present, and future. Integr Comp Biol 54:601–613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beebee TJC, Rowe G (2004) An introduction to molecular ecology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beehler BM, Foster MS (1988) Hotshots, hotspots, and female preferences in the organisation of lek mating systems. Am Nat 131:203–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR (2000) Promiscuity. An evolutionary history of sperm competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia G (1979) Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 19–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (1990) The red queen visits sage grouse leks. Am Zool 30:263–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle D (eds) Natural selection and social behaviour. Chiron Press, New York, pp 138–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1985) Contrasts between insects and vertebrates in the evolution of male display. Fortschr Zool 31:273–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 107–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL, Gibson RM (1986) Leks and the unanimity of female choice. In: Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH, Slatkin M (eds) Evolution: essays in honor of John Maynard-Smith. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan PLR, Prum RO, McCracken KG, Sorenson MD, Wilson RE, Birkhead TR (2007) Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl. PLoSOne 2(5):e418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza J, Hidalgo de Trucios SJ, Ena V (1989) Mating system flexibility in the great bustard: a comparative study. Bird Study 36:192–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro T (1997) Behavioural ecology and conservation biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Carranza J, de Trucios SJH (1993) Condition-dependence and sex traits in the male great bustard. Ethology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1993.tb00559.x

  • Chargé R, Saint-Jalme M, Lacroix F, Cadet A, Sorci G (2010) Male health status, signalled by courtship display, reveals ejaculate quality and hatching success in a lekking species. J Anim Ecol 79:843–850

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 67:437–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Robertson A (1989) Mate choice on fallow deer leks. Nature 340:463–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Price O, MacColl A (1992) Mate retention, harassment and the evolution of ungulate leks. Behav Ecol 3:234–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornec C, Hingrat Y, Rybak F (2014) Individual signature in a lekking species: visual and acoustic courtship parameters may help discriminating conspecifics in the Houbara Bustard. Ethology 120:726–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornec C, Hingrat Y, Robert A, Rybak F (2015) The meaning of boom calls in a lekking bird: identity or quality information? Anim Behav 109:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornec C, Hingrat Y, Aubin T, Rybak F (2017) Booming far: the long-range vocal strategy of a lekking bird. R Soc Open Sci 4:170594

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado MP, Traba J, García de la Morena EL, Morales MB (2010) Habitat selection and density-dependent relationships in spatial occupancy by male Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax. Ardea 98:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Dementiev G, Gladkov NA (1966) Birds of the Soviet Union. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  • Devoucoux P, Besnard A, Bretagnolle V (2018) Sex-dependent habitat selection in a high-density Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax population in southern France, and the implications for conservation. Ibis. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12606

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faria N, Rabaça J, Morales MB (2012) Linking plant composition and arthropod abundance to establish little bustard breeding requirements in pastureland dominated landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 21:2109–2125

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske PP, Rintamäki T, Karvonen E (1998) Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 9:328–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM (1989) Field playback of male display attracts females in lek-breeding sage grouse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:439–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Bradbury JW, Verhencamp SL (1991) Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behav Ecol 2:165–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM (1996) Female choice in sage grouse: the roles of attraction and active comparison. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RM, Bradbury JW (1985) Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliard ET (1969) Birds of paradise. Natural History Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role of parasites. Science 218:384–387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WL (1991) Correlates of male mating success in the ruff Philomachus pugnax, a lekking shorebird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:367–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingrat Y, Saint Jalme M, Chalah T, Orhant N, Lacroix F (2008) Environmental and social constraints on breeding site selection. Does the exploded-lek and hotspot model apply to the Houbara bustard Chlamydotis undulata undulata? J Avian Biol 39:393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J (1989) Size and plumage dimorphism in lek-breeding birds: a comparative analysis. Am Nat 134:72–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Robertson JGM (1990) Spacing of leks in relation to female home ranges, habitat requirements and male attractiveness in the great snipe (Gallinago media). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:173–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Eriksson M, Lindell LE (1990) Females of the lek-breeding great snipe, Gallinago media, prefer males with white tails. Anim Behav 40:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Gibson RM, Lundberg A (1995) Mate-choice copying in black grouse. Anim Behav 49:1627–1633

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiguet F (2001) Défense des ressources, choix du partenaire et mécanismes de formation des leks chez l'outarde canepetière (Tetrax tetrax), une espèce menacée des plaines céréalières. PhD Thesis, University of Paris 6, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiguet F, Bretagnolle V (2001) Courtship behaviour in a lekking species: individual variations and mating tactics in male Little Bustard. Behav Process 55:107–118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiguet F, Bretagnolle V (2006) Manipulating lek size and composition using decoys: an experimental investigation of lek evolution models. Am Nat 168:758–768

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiguet F, Bretagnolle V (2014) Sexy males and choosy females on exploded leks: correlates of male attractiveness in the Little Bustard. Behav Process. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.008

  • Jiguet F, Arroyo B, Bretagnolle V (2000) Lek mating system: a case study in the Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax. Behav Process 51:63–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiguet F, Jaulin S, Arroyo B (2002) Resource defence on exploded leks: do male little bustards, T. tetrax, control resources for females? Anim Behav 63:899–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA (1995) Honest advertisement of multiple qualities using multiple signals. J Theor Biol 177:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane SJ, Alonso JC, Martín CA (2001) Habitat preferences of great bustard Otis tarda flocks in the arable steppes of Central Spain: are potentially suitable area unoccupied? J Appl Ecol 38:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesobre L, Lacroix F, Le Nuz E, Hingrat Y, Chalah T, Saint Jalme M (2010) Absence of male reproductive skew, along with high frequency of polyandry and conspecific brood parasitism in the lekking Houbara bustard Chlamydotis undulata undulata. J Avian Biol 41:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lett JM, Guyomarch JC, Boutin JM (2000) Occupation de l’espace par les femelles reproductrices chez l’outarde canepetière (Tetrax tetrax). Cahiers d’Ethol 20:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon JD (1999) The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning JT, Hartley MA (1991) Symmetry and ornamentation are correlated in the peacock’s train. Anim Behav 42:1020–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín LJ, Martín I (1997) Selección de habitat y gregarismo de la Avutarda en La Moraña. El Cervunal 5:109–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller CW, Moore AJ (2007) A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:1279–1286

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim Behav 40:1185–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales MB (2000) Ecología Reproductiva y Movimientos Estacionales en la Avutarda (Otis tarda). PhD Thesis Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales MB, Alonso JC, Alonso JA, Martín E (2000) Migration patterns in male great bustards (Otis tarda). Auk 117:493–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales MB, Jiguet F, Arroyo B (2001) Exploded leks: what bustards can teach us. Ardeola 48:85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales MB, Alonso JC, Martin A, Martin E, Alonso JA (2003) Male sexual display and attractiveness in the great bustard Otis tarda: the role of body condition. J Ethol 21:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales MB, Traba J, Delgado MP, García de la Morena EL (2013) The use of fallows by nesting little bustard Tetrax tetrax females: implications for conservation in mosaic cereal farmland. Ardeola 60:85–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales MB, Casas F, García de la Morena EL, Ponjoan A, Calabuig C, Martínez-Padilla J, García JT, Mañosa S, Viñuela J, Bota G (2014) Density dependence and habitat quality modulate the intensity of display territory defense in an exploded lekking species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1493–1504

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseykin VN (1992) Ecology and protection of the Little Bustard in the Saratov region. Bustard Stud 5:78–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2008) Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox. J Theor Biol 254:147–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes EJ (1992) Lekking and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds: comparative approaches. Am Nat 140:665–684

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olea PP, Casas F, Redpath S, Vinuela J (2010) Bottoms up: great bustards use the sun to maximise signal efficacy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:927–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB (1984) Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Ornithol Monogr 33:1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Rodriguez L, Jovani R, Mougeot F (2013) Fractal geometry of a complex plumage trait reveals bird’s quality. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280(1755):20122783

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Halliday T (1994) Experimental and natural changes in the peacock’s (Pavo cristatus) train can affect mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:213–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Halliday T, Saunders C (1991) Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim Behav 41:323–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski A, Møller AP (1993) Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski A, Møller AP (1995) A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc R Soc Lond 360:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponjoan A, Bota G, Mañosa S (2010) Trapping techniques for little bustards Tetrax tetrax according to age, sex and season. Bird Study 57:252.255

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponjoan A, Bota G, Mañosa S (2012) Ranging behavior of little bustard males, Tetrax tetrax, in the lekking grounds. Behav Process 91:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston BT, Saint Jalme M, Hingrat Y, Lacroix F, Sorci G (2011) Sexually extravagant males age more rapidly. Ecol Lett 14:1017–1024

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preston BT, Saint-Jalme M, Hingrat Y, Lacroix F, Sorci G (2015) The sperm of aging males retards their offspring's development. Nat Commun 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7146

  • Price T, Kirkpatrick M, Arnold SJ (1988) Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. Science 240:798–799

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MJ, Dobson AP (1993) Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: conspecific attraction and recruitment. TREE 8:253–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rintamäki PT, Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A (1995) Male territoriality and female choice on black grouse leks. Anim Behav 49:759–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther SA, Fiske P, Kålås JA, Gjul JM (2000) Females of the lekking great snipe do not prefer males with whiter tails. Anim Behav 59:273–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sardà-Palomera F, Puigcerver M, Vinyoles D, Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD (2011) Exploring male and female preferences, male body condition, and pair bonds in the evolution of male sexual aggregation: the case of the common quail (Coturnix coturnix). Can J Zool 89:325–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz H (1986) Agonistisches Verhalten, Territorialverhalten und Balz der Zwergtrappe (Tetrax tetrax). J Ornithol 127:125–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva JP, Moreira F, Palmeirim JM (2017) Spatial and temporal dynamics of lekking behaviour revealed by high-resolution GPS tracking. Anim Behav 129:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillman RA, Clutton-Brock TH, Sutherland WJ (1993) Black holes, mate retention, and the evolution of ungulate leks. Behav Ecol 4:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC (1994) Female zebra finches prefer males with symmetric chest plumage. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:267–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarjuelo R, Delgado MP, Bota G, Morales MB, Traba J, Ponjoan A, Hervás I, Mañosa S (2013) Not only habitat but also sex: factors affecting spatial distribution of Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax families. Acta Ornithol 48:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarof SA, Ratcliffe LM, Kasumovic MM, Boag PT (2005) Are least flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) clusters hidden leks? Behav Ecol 16:207–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1976) Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects. Am Nat 110:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Traba J, Morales MB, de la Morena ELG, Delgado MP, Kristin A (2008) Selection of breeding territory by little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) males in Central Spain: the role of arthropod availability. Ecol Res 23:615–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuarin P, Bouchard A, Lesobre L, Levêque G, Chalah T, Saint Jalme M, Lacroix F, Hingrat Y, Sorci G (2018) No evidence for prezygotic postcopulatory avoidance of kin despite high inbreeding depression. Mol Ecol 27:5252–5262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vuarin P, Bouchard A, Lesobre L, Levêque G, Chalah T, Saint Jalme M, Lacroix F, Hingrat Y, Sorci G (2019) Post-copulatory sexual selection allows females to alleviate the fitness costs incurred when mating with senescing males. Proc R Soc B 286:20191675

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner RH (1998) Hidden leks: sexual selection and the clustering of avian territories. In: Parker PG, Burley N (eds) Female and male extra-pair mating tactics in birds. American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington DC, pp 123–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff A, Dieuleveult T, Martin JL, Bretagnolle V (2002) Landscape context and little bustard abundance in a fragmented steppe: implications for reserve management in mosaic landscapes. Biol Conserv 107:211–220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Juan Moreno Klemming and Michel Saint-Jalme for their valuable comments and suggestion on a previous version of this chapter. Particular thanks are due to Nigel J. Collar for kindly reviewing the English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Bretagnolle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bretagnolle, V., Mañosa, S., Mougeot, F., Morales, M.B. (2022). Behavioural Ecology of the Little Bustard: Sexual Selection and Mating Systems. In: Bretagnolle, V., Traba, J., Morales, M.B. (eds) Little Bustard: Ecology and Conservation. Wildlife Research Monographs, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84902-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics