Abstract
In this chapter, we focus mainly on the behavioural ecology of the little bustard (i.e. how behaviour relates to ecology and evolution), with particular emphasis on breeding behaviour, sexual selection and mating systems, as well as their relevance for little bustard conservation. We discuss the evolutionary forces that drive the species’ lekking behaviour and its variations under the framework of sexual selection theory. We also discuss other less studied aspects of little bustard behavioural ecology (sperm competition, personality traits, and parent–offspring conflicts). The little bustard mating system is described in most localities as an exploded lek strategy but can be quite flexible, and a variety of situations ranging from resource-based monogamy to classical leks have been suggested. Several non-exclusive theoretical models of lek formation have been proposed and are all consistent, to some degree, with the little bustard’s lekking behaviour. However, two models (hotshot and black hole) seem particularly appropriate to describe the little bustard mating system at different spatial scales. On larger scales, female mobility and harassment by individual males may induce male aggregation as described by the black hole mechanism. At smaller scales, female preference for particularly attractive males (hotshot) or certain lek sizes may induce an initial clustering, which would be further maintained and structured as a result of the hotshot mechanism. Overall, the female choice seems to be based on multiple criteria (male snort call rate, plumage traits and displays). Habitat quality and resources within male territories are variable, and evidence suggests that these determine male settlement, but no evidence supports a decisive role in mate choice. Evidence regarding sperm competition in little bustard is scarce as well as contradictory. The apparently long time elapsing between mating and laying would allow for potential cryptic female choice through sperm competition, but the apparently low rate of copulation suggests that sperm competition might not be intense in little bustards. Evidence from decoy experiments and observations suggests that male and female little bustard behaviours (displays, behaviour during captures) are variable but consistent (repeatable) within individuals and may define individual personalities. These aspects of little bustard behaviour, and their relevance for conservation, also deserve further study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behaviour in acoustic insects. In: Pimentel D (ed) Insects, science and society. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–77
Alonso JC, Alonso JA, Martín E, Morales MB (1998) Proximate and ultimate causes of natal dispersal in the great bustard, Otis tarda. Behav Ecol 9:243–252
Alonso JC, Morales MB, Alonso JA (2000) Partial migration, lek fidelity and nesting area fidelity in female great bustards Otis tarda. Condor 102:127–136
Alonso JC, Martín CA, Alonso JA, Palacín C, Magaña M, Lane SJ (2004) Distribution dynamics of a great bustard metapopulation throughout a decade: influence of conspecific attraction and recruitment. Biodivers Conserv 13:1659–1674
Alonso JC, Alvarez-Martinez JM, Palacín C (2012) Leks in ground-displaying birds : hotspots or safe places ? Behav Ecol 23:491–501
Alonso JC, Martín E, Morales MB, Alonso JA (2018) Sibling competition and not maternal allocation drives differential offspring feeding in a sexually size-dimorphic bird. Anim Behav 137:35–44
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Balenger SL, Zuk M (2014) Testing the Hamilton–Zuk hypothesis: past, present, and future. Integr Comp Biol 54:601–613
Beebee TJC, Rowe G (2004) An introduction to molecular ecology. Oxford University Press, New York
Beehler BM, Foster MS (1988) Hotshots, hotspots, and female preferences in the organisation of lek mating systems. Am Nat 131:203–219
Birkhead TR (2000) Promiscuity. An evolutionary history of sperm competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, London
Borgia G (1979) Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York, pp 19–80
Boyce MS (1990) The red queen visits sage grouse leks. Am Zool 30:263–270
Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle D (eds) Natural selection and social behaviour. Chiron Press, New York, pp 138–169
Bradbury JW (1985) Contrasts between insects and vertebrates in the evolution of male display. Fortschr Zool 31:273–289
Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 107–138
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL, Gibson RM (1986) Leks and the unanimity of female choice. In: Greenwood PJ, Harvey PH, Slatkin M (eds) Evolution: essays in honor of John Maynard-Smith. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 301–314
Brennan PLR, Prum RO, McCracken KG, Sorenson MD, Wilson RE, Birkhead TR (2007) Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl. PLoSOne 2(5):e418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000418
Carranza J, Hidalgo de Trucios SJ, Ena V (1989) Mating system flexibility in the great bustard: a comparative study. Bird Study 36:192–198
Caro T (1997) Behavioural ecology and conservation biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Carranza J, de Trucios SJH (1993) Condition-dependence and sex traits in the male great bustard. Ethology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1993.tb00559.x
Chargé R, Saint-Jalme M, Lacroix F, Cadet A, Sorci G (2010) Male health status, signalled by courtship display, reveals ejaculate quality and hatching success in a lekking species. J Anim Ecol 79:843–850
Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 67:437–456
Clutton-Brock TH, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Robertson A (1989) Mate choice on fallow deer leks. Nature 340:463–465
Clutton-Brock TH, Price O, MacColl A (1992) Mate retention, harassment and the evolution of ungulate leks. Behav Ecol 3:234–242
Cornec C, Hingrat Y, Rybak F (2014) Individual signature in a lekking species: visual and acoustic courtship parameters may help discriminating conspecifics in the Houbara Bustard. Ethology 120:726–737
Cornec C, Hingrat Y, Robert A, Rybak F (2015) The meaning of boom calls in a lekking bird: identity or quality information? Anim Behav 109:249–264
Cornec C, Hingrat Y, Aubin T, Rybak F (2017) Booming far: the long-range vocal strategy of a lekking bird. R Soc Open Sci 4:170594
Delgado MP, Traba J, García de la Morena EL, Morales MB (2010) Habitat selection and density-dependent relationships in spatial occupancy by male Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax. Ardea 98:185–194
Dementiev G, Gladkov NA (1966) Birds of the Soviet Union. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem
Devoucoux P, Besnard A, Bretagnolle V (2018) Sex-dependent habitat selection in a high-density Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax population in southern France, and the implications for conservation. Ibis. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12606
Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223
Faria N, Rabaça J, Morales MB (2012) Linking plant composition and arthropod abundance to establish little bustard breeding requirements in pastureland dominated landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 21:2109–2125
Fiske PP, Rintamäki T, Karvonen E (1998) Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 9:328–338
Gibson RM (1989) Field playback of male display attracts females in lek-breeding sage grouse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:439–443
Gibson RM, Bradbury JW, Verhencamp SL (1991) Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behav Ecol 2:165–180
Gibson RM (1996) Female choice in sage grouse: the roles of attraction and active comparison. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:55–59
Gibson RM, Bradbury JW (1985) Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:117–123
Gilliard ET (1969) Birds of paradise. Natural History Press, New York
Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role of parasites. Science 218:384–387
Hill WL (1991) Correlates of male mating success in the ruff Philomachus pugnax, a lekking shorebird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:367–372
Hingrat Y, Saint Jalme M, Chalah T, Orhant N, Lacroix F (2008) Environmental and social constraints on breeding site selection. Does the exploded-lek and hotspot model apply to the Houbara bustard Chlamydotis undulata undulata? J Avian Biol 39:393–404
Höglund J (1989) Size and plumage dimorphism in lek-breeding birds: a comparative analysis. Am Nat 134:72–87
Höglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Höglund J, Robertson JGM (1990) Spacing of leks in relation to female home ranges, habitat requirements and male attractiveness in the great snipe (Gallinago media). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:173–180
Höglund J, Eriksson M, Lindell LE (1990) Females of the lek-breeding great snipe, Gallinago media, prefer males with white tails. Anim Behav 40:23–32
Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Gibson RM, Lundberg A (1995) Mate-choice copying in black grouse. Anim Behav 49:1627–1633
Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:107–112
Jiguet F (2001) Défense des ressources, choix du partenaire et mécanismes de formation des leks chez l'outarde canepetière (Tetrax tetrax), une espèce menacée des plaines céréalières. PhD Thesis, University of Paris 6, Paris
Jiguet F, Bretagnolle V (2001) Courtship behaviour in a lekking species: individual variations and mating tactics in male Little Bustard. Behav Process 55:107–118
Jiguet F, Bretagnolle V (2006) Manipulating lek size and composition using decoys: an experimental investigation of lek evolution models. Am Nat 168:758–768
Jiguet F, Bretagnolle V (2014) Sexy males and choosy females on exploded leks: correlates of male attractiveness in the Little Bustard. Behav Process. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.008
Jiguet F, Arroyo B, Bretagnolle V (2000) Lek mating system: a case study in the Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax. Behav Process 51:63–82
Jiguet F, Jaulin S, Arroyo B (2002) Resource defence on exploded leks: do male little bustards, T. tetrax, control resources for females? Anim Behav 63:899–905
Johnstone RA (1995) Honest advertisement of multiple qualities using multiple signals. J Theor Biol 177:87–94
Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38
Lane SJ, Alonso JC, Martín CA (2001) Habitat preferences of great bustard Otis tarda flocks in the arable steppes of Central Spain: are potentially suitable area unoccupied? J Appl Ecol 38:193–203
Lesobre L, Lacroix F, Le Nuz E, Hingrat Y, Chalah T, Saint Jalme M (2010) Absence of male reproductive skew, along with high frequency of polyandry and conspecific brood parasitism in the lekking Houbara bustard Chlamydotis undulata undulata. J Avian Biol 41:117–127
Lett JM, Guyomarch JC, Boutin JM (2000) Occupation de l’espace par les femelles reproductrices chez l’outarde canepetière (Tetrax tetrax). Cahiers d’Ethol 20:1–20
Ligon JD (1999) The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Manning JT, Hartley MA (1991) Symmetry and ornamentation are correlated in the peacock’s train. Anim Behav 42:1020–1021
Martín LJ, Martín I (1997) Selección de habitat y gregarismo de la Avutarda en La Moraña. El Cervunal 5:109–175
Miller CW, Moore AJ (2007) A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:1279–1286
Møller AP (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim Behav 40:1185–1187
Morales MB (2000) Ecología Reproductiva y Movimientos Estacionales en la Avutarda (Otis tarda). PhD Thesis Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid
Morales MB, Alonso JC, Alonso JA, Martín E (2000) Migration patterns in male great bustards (Otis tarda). Auk 117:493–498
Morales MB, Jiguet F, Arroyo B (2001) Exploded leks: what bustards can teach us. Ardeola 48:85–98
Morales MB, Alonso JC, Martin A, Martin E, Alonso JA (2003) Male sexual display and attractiveness in the great bustard Otis tarda: the role of body condition. J Ethol 21:51–56
Morales MB, Traba J, Delgado MP, García de la Morena EL (2013) The use of fallows by nesting little bustard Tetrax tetrax females: implications for conservation in mosaic cereal farmland. Ardeola 60:85–97
Morales MB, Casas F, García de la Morena EL, Ponjoan A, Calabuig C, Martínez-Padilla J, García JT, Mañosa S, Viñuela J, Bota G (2014) Density dependence and habitat quality modulate the intensity of display territory defense in an exploded lekking species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1493–1504
Moseykin VN (1992) Ecology and protection of the Little Bustard in the Saratov region. Bustard Stud 5:78–91
Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2008) Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox. J Theor Biol 254:147–155
Oakes EJ (1992) Lekking and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds: comparative approaches. Am Nat 140:665–684
Olea PP, Casas F, Redpath S, Vinuela J (2010) Bottoms up: great bustards use the sun to maximise signal efficacy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:927–937
Payne RB (1984) Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Ornithol Monogr 33:1–53
Perez-Rodriguez L, Jovani R, Mougeot F (2013) Fractal geometry of a complex plumage trait reveals bird’s quality. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280(1755):20122783
Petrie M, Halliday T (1994) Experimental and natural changes in the peacock’s (Pavo cristatus) train can affect mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:213–217
Petrie M, Halliday T, Saunders C (1991) Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim Behav 41:323–331
Pomiankowski A, Møller AP (1993) Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:167–176
Pomiankowski A, Møller AP (1995) A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc R Soc Lond 360:31–39
Ponjoan A, Bota G, Mañosa S (2010) Trapping techniques for little bustards Tetrax tetrax according to age, sex and season. Bird Study 57:252.255
Ponjoan A, Bota G, Mañosa S (2012) Ranging behavior of little bustard males, Tetrax tetrax, in the lekking grounds. Behav Process 91:35–40
Preston BT, Saint Jalme M, Hingrat Y, Lacroix F, Sorci G (2011) Sexually extravagant males age more rapidly. Ecol Lett 14:1017–1024
Preston BT, Saint-Jalme M, Hingrat Y, Lacroix F, Sorci G (2015) The sperm of aging males retards their offspring's development. Nat Commun 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7146
Price T, Kirkpatrick M, Arnold SJ (1988) Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. Science 240:798–799
Reed MJ, Dobson AP (1993) Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: conspecific attraction and recruitment. TREE 8:253–256
Rintamäki PT, Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A (1995) Male territoriality and female choice on black grouse leks. Anim Behav 49:759–767
Sæther SA, Fiske P, Kålås JA, Gjul JM (2000) Females of the lekking great snipe do not prefer males with whiter tails. Anim Behav 59:273–280
Sardà-Palomera F, Puigcerver M, Vinyoles D, Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD (2011) Exploring male and female preferences, male body condition, and pair bonds in the evolution of male sexual aggregation: the case of the common quail (Coturnix coturnix). Can J Zool 89:325–333
Schulz H (1986) Agonistisches Verhalten, Territorialverhalten und Balz der Zwergtrappe (Tetrax tetrax). J Ornithol 127:125–204
Silva JP, Moreira F, Palmeirim JM (2017) Spatial and temporal dynamics of lekking behaviour revealed by high-resolution GPS tracking. Anim Behav 129:197–204
Stillman RA, Clutton-Brock TH, Sutherland WJ (1993) Black holes, mate retention, and the evolution of ungulate leks. Behav Ecol 4:1–6
Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC (1994) Female zebra finches prefer males with symmetric chest plumage. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:267–271
Tarjuelo R, Delgado MP, Bota G, Morales MB, Traba J, Ponjoan A, Hervás I, Mañosa S (2013) Not only habitat but also sex: factors affecting spatial distribution of Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax families. Acta Ornithol 48:119–128
Tarof SA, Ratcliffe LM, Kasumovic MM, Boag PT (2005) Are least flycatcher (Empidonax minimus) clusters hidden leks? Behav Ecol 16:207–217
Thornhill R (1976) Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects. Am Nat 110:153–163
Traba J, Morales MB, de la Morena ELG, Delgado MP, Kristin A (2008) Selection of breeding territory by little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) males in Central Spain: the role of arthropod availability. Ecol Res 23:615–622
Vuarin P, Bouchard A, Lesobre L, Levêque G, Chalah T, Saint Jalme M, Lacroix F, Hingrat Y, Sorci G (2018) No evidence for prezygotic postcopulatory avoidance of kin despite high inbreeding depression. Mol Ecol 27:5252–5262
Vuarin P, Bouchard A, Lesobre L, Levêque G, Chalah T, Saint Jalme M, Lacroix F, Hingrat Y, Sorci G (2019) Post-copulatory sexual selection allows females to alleviate the fitness costs incurred when mating with senescing males. Proc R Soc B 286:20191675
Wagner RH (1998) Hidden leks: sexual selection and the clustering of avian territories. In: Parker PG, Burley N (eds) Female and male extra-pair mating tactics in birds. American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington DC, pp 123–146
Wolff A, Dieuleveult T, Martin JL, Bretagnolle V (2002) Landscape context and little bustard abundance in a fragmented steppe: implications for reserve management in mosaic landscapes. Biol Conserv 107:211–220
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Juan Moreno Klemming and Michel Saint-Jalme for their valuable comments and suggestion on a previous version of this chapter. Particular thanks are due to Nigel J. Collar for kindly reviewing the English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bretagnolle, V., Mañosa, S., Mougeot, F., Morales, M.B. (2022). Behavioural Ecology of the Little Bustard: Sexual Selection and Mating Systems. In: Bretagnolle, V., Traba, J., Morales, M.B. (eds) Little Bustard: Ecology and Conservation. Wildlife Research Monographs, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84902-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84902-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84901-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84902-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)