Abstract
This paper investigates PhD entrepreneurship. We focus on the university factors most closely associated to: (1) students’ success in starting a business venture; (2) students’ startup intention; (3) students’ abandoning the entrepreneurial idea. The empirical analysis is based on data from a questionnaire survey, administered in 2016 in Italy. We focus on four factors related to the university entrepreneurial environment: (1) university entrepreneurship policy frameworks; (2) PhD orientation to business problems; (3) entrepreneurship training; (4) PhD lab reputation. We find that the academic environment can have a fundamental impact on students’ decisions to start new ventures and on their entrepreneurial attitude.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The variance inflation factor test was always below 10.
References
Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42, 408–422.
Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48, 44–60.
Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 732–755.
Åstebro, T., & Bazzazian, N. (2011). Universities, entrepreneurship and local economic development. In M. Fritsch (Ed.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and regional development. Edward Elgar.
Åstebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012). Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41(4), 663–677.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.
Azagra-Caro, J. M., Mas-Verdú, F., & Martinez-Gomez, V. (2012). Forget R&D–pay my coach: Young innovative companies and their relations with universities. In Technology transfer in a global economy (pp. 13–34). Springer.
Barbero, J., Casillas, J., & Wright, M. (2014). Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 151–168.
Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37, 1837–1853.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19, 69–89.
Bergmann, H., Hundt, C., & Sternberg, R. (2016). What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Business Economics, 47, 53–76.
Bienkowska, D., & Klofsten, M. (2012). Creating entrepreneurial networks: Academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education. Higher Education, 64, 207–222.
Bienkowska, D., Klofsten, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2016). PhD students in the entrepreneurial university – perceived support for academic entrepreneurship. European Journal of Education, 51, 56–72.
Blackford, B. J., Sebora, T. C., & Whitehill, T. (2009). The effects of collegiate entrepreneurship education on post-graduation startup of new ventures: A first look. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 1–26.
Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., Fantoni, S., Folli, V., Leonetti, M., & Ruocco, G. (2017). Do social sciences and humanities behave like life and hard sciences? Scientometrics, 112(1), 607–653.
Branscomb, L. M., Kodama, F., & Richard, F. (1999). Industrializing knowledge: University–industry linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press.
Caldera, A., & Debande, O. (2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39(9), 1160–1173.
Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., & Vezzulli, A. (2007). If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world. Research Policy, 36, 303–319.
Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40, 1084–1093.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.
Colombo, M. G., & Piva, E. (2012). Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 41, 79–92.
Conti, A., & Visentin, F. (2015). A revealed preference analysis of PhD students’ choices over employment outcomes. Research Policy, 44, 1931–1947.
D’Este, P., Mahdi, S., Neely, A., & Rentocchini, F. (2012). Inventors and entrepreneurs in academia: What types of skills and experience matter? Technovation, 32(5), 293–303.
De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 41–64.
Delamont S., & Atkinson P. (2001). Editorial. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 275–277.
Dooley, L., & Kenny, B. (2015). Research collaboration and commercialization: The PhD candidate perspective. Industry and Higher Education, 29, 93–110.
Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123(4), 122–129.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313–330.
European Commission. (2010). Monitoring industrial research: The 2010 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. Seville.
Feldman, M. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861–891.
Geisler, E., & Rubenstein, A. H. (1989). University-industry relations: A review of major issues. In A. N. Link & G. Tassey (Eds.), Cooperative research and development: The industry-university-government relationship (pp. 43–62). Kluwer Academic.
Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva, 47, 93–114.
Ghio, N., Guerini, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44, 1–18.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J. A., & Gajón, E. (2018). Determinants of graduates’ start-ups creation across a multi-campus entrepreneurial university: The case of Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education. Journal of Small Business Management, 56, 150–178.
Harris, M., & Gibson, S. G. (2008). Examining the entrepreneurial attitudes of US business students. Education and Training, 4(1), 35–50.
Hoppe, M. (2016). Policy and entrepreneurship education. Small Business Economics, 46, 13–29.
Jansen, S., van de Zande, T., Brinkkemper, S., Stam, E., & Varma, V. (2015). How education, stimulation, and incubation encourage student entrepreneurship: Observations from MIT, IIIT, and Utrecht University. International Journal of Management Education, 13, 170–181.
Kessels, J., & Kwakman, K. (2007). Interface: Establishing knowledge networks between higher vocational education and business. Higher Education, 54(5), 689–703.
Krabel, S., & Mueller, P. (2009). What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists. Research Policy, 38, 947–956.
Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577–597.
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Rherrad, I. (2006). Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities. Research Policy, 35, 1599–1615.
Laudel, G. (2001). Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate. International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 762–781.
Lester, S., & Costley, C. (2010). Work-based learning at higher education level: Value, practice and critique. Studies in Higher Education, 35(5), 561–575.
Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. J. (2003). Technology transfer and universities’ spin-out strategies. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 185–200.
Lowe, R. A., & Gonzalez-Brambila, C. (2007). Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 173–194.
Maresch, D., Harms, R., Kailer, N., & Wimmer-Wurm, B. (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial intention of students in science and engineering versus business studies university programs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 172–179.
McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2008). High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources. Technovation, 28, 277–290.
McCormack, J., Propper, C., & Smith, S. (2014). Herding cats? Management and university performance. Economic Journal, 124, 534–564.
Miller, C. C., Glick, W. H., & Cardinal, L. B. (2005). The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science: Accumulative advantage, sponsored mobility, and contest mobility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 489–516.
Mitra, J., & Matlay, H. (2004). Entrepreneurial and vocational education and training: Lessons from eastern and central Europe. Industry and Higher Education, 18(1), 53–69.
Muscio, A., & Pozzali, A. (2013). The effects of cognitive distance in university-industry collaborations: Some evidence from Italian universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 486–508.
Muscio, A., & Ramaciotti, L. (2018). Dataset from a qualitative survey on Ph.D. entrepreneurship in Italy. Data in Brief, 18, 1272–1276.
Muscio, A., & Ramaciotti, L. (2019). How does academia influence Ph.D. entrepreneurship? New insights on the entrepreneurial university. Technovation, 82–83, 16–24.
Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Vallanti, G. (2013). Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities? Research Policy, 42, 63–75.
Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Ramaciotti, L. (2016). The effects of university rules on spinoff creation: The case of academia in Italy. Research Policy, 45, 1386–1396.
Olmos-Peñuela, J., Castro-Martínez, E., D’Este, P., & D’Este, P. (2014). Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents. Research Policy, 43, 696–706.
Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M., & Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54(3), 442–454.
Phan, P. H., & Siegel, D. S. (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2, 77–144.
Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31, 161–170.
Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. (2005). Policy orientation effects on performance with licensing to start-ups and small companies. Research Policy, 34, 1028–1042.
Pruett, M., Shinnar, R., Toney, B., Francisco, L., & Fox, J. (2009). Explaining entrepreneurial intentions of university students: a cross cultural study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 15(6), 1355–2554.
Ramaciotti, L., & Rizzo, U. (2015). The determinants of academic spin-offs creation by Italian universities. R&D Management, 45(5), 501–514.
Ramaciotti, L., Muscio, A., & Rizzo, U. (2017). The impact of hard and soft policy measures on new technology-based firms. Regional Studies, 51(4), 629–642.
Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39, 602–612.
Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2014). The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Research Policy, 43, 92–106.
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 691–791.
Sanchez, J. (2011). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 7, 239–254.
Shah, S. K., & Pahnke, E. C. (2014). Parting the ivory curtain: Understanding how universities support a diverse set of startups. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 780–792.
Shibayama, S. (2019). Sustainable development of science and scientists: Academic training in life science labs. Research Policy, 48, 676–692.
Shibayama, S., Baba, Y., & Walsh, J. P. (2015). Organizational design of university laboratories: Task allocation and lab performance in Japanese bioscience laboratories. Research Policy, 44, 610–622.
Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26, 582–595.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27–48.
Slaughter, S., Campbell, T., Holleman, M., & Morgan, E. (2002). The “traffic” in graduate students: Graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(2), 282–312.
Smith, B. R., Matthews, C. H., & Schenkel, M. T. (2009). Differences in entrepreneurial opportunities: The role of tacitness and codification in opportunity identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(1), 38–57.
Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 566–591.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signalling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
Stamboulis, Y., & Barlas, A. (2014). Entrepreneurship education impact on student attitudes. The International Journal of Management Education, 12, 365–373.
Stephan, P. E. (2012). How economics shapes science. Harvard University Press.
Storey, D., & Tether, B. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: An introduction. Research Policy, 26, 933–946.
Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.
Thune, T. (2009). Doctoral students on the university-industry doctoral interface: A review of the literature. Higher Education, 58, 637–651.
Thune, T., & Støren, L. A. (2015). Study and labour market effects of graduate students’ interaction with work organisations during education. Education + Training, 57, 702–722.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2007). University licensing. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 620–639.
Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40, 553–564.
Vanevenhoven, J., & Liguori, E. (2013). The impact of entrepreneurship education: Introducing the entrepreneurship education project. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 315–328.
Van Rijnsoever, F. J., van Weele, M. A., & Eveleens, C. P. (2017). Network brokers or hit makers? Analyzing the influence of incubation on start-up investments. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13, 605–629.
Von Graevenitz, G., Harhoff, D., & Weber, R. (2010). The effects of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76, 90–112.
Walter, S. G., Parboteeah, K. P., & Walter, A. (2013). University departments and self-employment intentions of business students: A cross-level analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 175–200.
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship-conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.
Wright, M., Vohora, A., & Lockett, A. (2004). The formation of high-tech university spinouts: The role of joint ventures and venture capital investors. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 287–310.
Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Edward Elgar.
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. (1996). Star Scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 12709–12716.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Ugo Rizzo for his help with the data cleaning process and to CINECA for the questionnaire administration and data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muscio, A., Shibayama, S., Ramaciotti, L. (2022). The Effects of the Academic Environment on PhD Entrepreneurship: New Insights from Survey Data. In: Azagra-Caro, J.M., D'Este, P., Barberá-Tomás, D. (eds) University-Industry Knowledge Interactions. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84669-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84669-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84668-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84669-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)