Skip to main content

What Makes Surgical Ethics Unique?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Difficult Decisions in Surgical Ethics

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide an overview of ethical principles as they apply to health care, with a focus on surgical ethics. We discuss why surgical ethics matter and what makes surgical ethics unique, spanning aspects of patient care, professional integrity, research, administration, education, and surgical training and education. We present observations on how surgical ethics can be taught, and, finally, we speculate on the future of ethics in surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sade RM. The ethics of surgery: conflicts and controversies. Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonde S, Firenze P. A framework for making ethical decisions. Science and technology studies. Brown University; 2013. https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions. Accessed 15 Dec 2020.

  3. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8th ed. Oxford University Press; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jonsen A, Siegler M, Winslade W. Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. 8th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2015. p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pellegrini CA. Presidential address: the surgeon of the future: anchoring innovation and science with moral values. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2013;98(12):8–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. American Medical Association. Opinion 9.2.2. Code of medical ethics. American Medical Association; 2017. p. 142–143.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim GJ, Clark MJ, Meyerson SL, et al. Mind the gap: the autonomy perception gap in the operating room by surgical residents and faculty. J Surg Educ. 2020;77:1522–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kon AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA. 2010;309:903–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Swain JD, Soegaard Ballester JM, Luc JGY, Han JJ. Burning the candle at both ends: Mitigating surgeon burnout at the training stages. [Published online ahead of print June 21, 2020]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.122.

  10. Varghese TKJ, Entwistle JW, Mayer JE, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Sade RM, for the Cardiothoracic Ethics Forum. Ethical standards for cardiothoracic surgeons’ participation in social media. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108:666–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsurg.2019.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Code of Ethics. Society of thoracic surgeons. https://sts.org/about-sts/policies/code-ethics. Accessed 15 Dec 2020.

  12. Code of Ethics. American association for thoracic surgery. https://www.aats.org/aatsimis/AATSWeb/Association/About/Governance/By-Laws_and_Policies/Code_of_Ethics.aspx. Accessed 15 Dec 2020.

  13. Mueller U. Medizingeschichte: Herznaht wider ethische Bedenken. Dtsch Arztebl. 2007;104(1–2):A26–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guiding Principles for Ethical Research. National Institutes of Health (NIH). https://www.nih.gov/health-information/nih-clinical-research-trials-you/guiding-principles-ethical-research. Accessed 15 Dec 2020.

  15. Gawande A. Complications. Metropolitan Books; 2002:15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Belmont report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research; 1979. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2020.

  17. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (‘Common Rule’). https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/common-rule/index.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2020.

  18. Sade RM, McKneally MF. Evolution of STS ethical standards: adjudication, policy making, and education. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:S44–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsurg.2013.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Watson DC, Robicsek F, Sade RM. Are thoracic surgeons ethically obligated to serve as expert witnesses for the plaintiff? Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(4):1137–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.athoracsurg.2004.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Devon K, Sade R. Surgical ethics: how I teach it. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110(6):1805–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsurg.2020.07.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. ACGME Common Program Requirements. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2017. p. 11. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs_2017-07-01.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2020.

  22. Howard F, McKneally MF, Upshur REG, Levin AV. The formal and informal surgical ethics curriculum: views of resident and staff surgeons in Toronto. Am J Surg. 2012;203(2):258–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.02.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brewster LP, Hall DE, Joehl RJ. Assessing residents in surgical ethics: we do it a lot; we only know a little. J Surg Res. 2011;171(2):395–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. D’Amico TA, McKneally MF, Sade RM. Ethics in cardiothoracic surgery: a survey of surgeons’ views. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(1):11–13.e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsurg.2010.03.061.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Snelgrove R, Ng SL, Devon K. Reconceptualizing ethics through morbidity and mortality rounds. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;231:233–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.04.038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Devon K. Turning the spotlight on the Editor. The Surgical Spotlight. University of Toronto. Fall-Winter; 2015–2016. p. 15. http://www.surgicalspotlight.ca/Shared/PDF/SS_Winter-Spring_16.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Sade .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Luc, J.G.Y., Han, J.J., Sade, R.M. (2022). What Makes Surgical Ethics Unique?. In: Lonchyna, V.A., Kelley, P., Angelos, P. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Surgical Ethics. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84625-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84625-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84624-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84625-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics