Abstract
Whole slide imaging (WSI) underpins a technological revolution which is transforming the practice of pathology. The microscope has been the primary method of histopathologic interpretation for hundreds of years, is the primary modality with which essentially all pathologists have received their training, and still is the primary diagnostic methodology for the vast majority of surgical pathology cases. However, WSI has matured technologically and can now be used for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology in many countries [1–4]. Since this modality is accepted for use in clinical practice and is being integrated into clinical workflows, robust quality assurance (QA) and quality improvement (QI) programs are necessary to ensure excellent clinical care. The defining feature of WSI is that digitization of glass slides obviates interpreting physical glass slides for pathologic evaluation. The “virtual” nature of a WSI workflow alleviates physical constraints and creates unique QA opportunities such as enabling the remote viewing of slides, enabling slide sorting functionalities, and creating disruptive approaches to objective analysis and computational approaches to quality efforts. The QA opportunities afforded by these unique characteristics of WSI are detailed below in the context of the three phases of testing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Evans AJ, et al. US food and drug administration approval of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis: a key milestone is reached and new questions are raised. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(11):1383–7.
Stathonikos N, et al. Going fully digital: perspective of a Dutch academic pathology lab. J Pathol Inform. 2013;4:15.
Thorstenson S, Molin J, Lundstrom C. Implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: digital pathology experiences 2006-2013. J Pathol Inform. 2014;5(1):14.
Cheng CL, et al. Enabling digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: navigating through the implementation journey in an academic medical centre. J Clin Pathol. 2016;69(9):784–92.
Valenstein PN, Sirota RL. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine. Clin Lab Med. 2004;24(4):979–96, vii
Heher YK, et al. Achieving high reliability in histology: an improvement series to reduce errors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;146(5):554–60.
Cloetingh D, Schmidt RA, Kong CS. Comparison of three methods for measuring workload in surgical pathology and cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017;148(1):16–22.
Ducatman BS, Parslow T. Benchmarking academic anatomic pathologists: the Association of Pathology Chairs Survey. Acad Pathol. 2016;3:2374289516666832.
Fraggetta F, et al. Routine digital pathology workflow: the Catania experience. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8:51.
Baidoshvili A, et al. Evaluating the benefits of digital pathology implementation: time savings in laboratory logistics. Histopathology. 2018;73(5):784–94.
Hanna MG, et al. Implementation of digital pathology offers clinical and operational increase in efficiency and cost savings. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(12):1545–55.
Gray A, et al. Quantification of histochemical stains using whole slide imaging: development of a method and demonstration of its usefulness in laboratory quality control. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68(3):192–9.
Bautista PA, Hashimoto N, Yagi Y. Color standardization in whole slide imaging using a color calibration slide. J Pathol Inform. 2014;5(1):4.
Clarke EL, Treanor D. Colour in digital pathology: a review. Histopathology. 2017;70(2):153–63.
Krupinski EA, et al. Observer performance using virtual pathology slides: impact of LCD color reproduction accuracy. J Digit Imaging. 2012;25(6):738–43.
Hirschorn DS, Krupinski EA, Flynn MJ. PACS displays: how to select the right display technology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(12 Pt B):1270–6.
Peck D, Flynn M. TU-E-217A-01: informatics 1: DICOM and the QMP, assessment of color displays. Med Phys. 2012;39(6Part24):3916.
Van Eycke YR, et al. Image processing in digital pathology: an opportunity to solve inter-batch variability of immunohistochemical staining. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42964.
Khan AM, et al. A nonlinear mapping approach to stain normalization in digital histopathology images using image-specific color deconvolution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61(6):1729–38.
Xu J, et al. Sparse non-negative matrix factorization (SNMF) based color unmixing for breast histopathological image analysis. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2015;46(Pt 1):20–9.
Van Eycke YR, et al. Segmentation of glandular epithelium in colorectal tumours to automatically compartmentalise IHC biomarker quantification: a deep learning approach. Med Image Anal. 2018;49:35–45.
Yagi Y, Gilbertson JR. Digital imaging in pathology: the case for standardization. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(3):109–16.
Kayser K, et al. Image standards in tissue-based diagnosis (diagnostic surgical pathology). Diagn Pathol. 2008;3:17.
Montalto MC, McKay RR, Filkins RJ. Autofocus methods of whole slide imaging systems and the introduction of a second-generation independent dual sensor scanning method. J Pathol Inform. 2011;2:44.
Shrestha P, et al. A quantitative approach to evaluate image quality of whole slide imaging scanners. J Pathol Inform. 2016;7:56.
Hashimoto N, et al. Referenceless image quality evaluation for whole slide imaging. J Pathol Inform. 2012;3:9.
Campanella G, et al. Towards machine learned quality control: a benchmark for sharpness quantification in digital pathology. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2018;65:142–51.
MS Hossain., et al., Practical image quality evaluation for whole slide imaging scanner. Proceedings Biomedical Imaging and Sensing Conference. 2018. Vol. 10711.
Moles Lopez X, et al. An automated blur detection method for histological whole slide imaging. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82710.
Graham AR, et al. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program. Hum Pathol. 2009;40(8):1129–36.
Lopez AM, et al. Virtual slide telepathology enables an innovative telehealth rapid breast care clinic. Hum Pathol. 2009;40(8):1082–91.
Clunie D, et al. Digital imaging and communications in medicine whole slide imaging connectathon at digital pathology association pathology visions 2017. J Pathol Inform. 2018;9:6.
Wilbur DC, et al. Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: a pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(12):1949–53.
Jones NC, et al. Interinstitutional whole slide imaging teleconsultation service development: assessment using internal training and clinical consultation cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139(5):627–35.
Baidoshvili, A., et al. Validation of a whole-slide image-based teleconsultation network. Histopathology, 2018.
Zhao C, et al. International telepathology consultation: three years of experience between the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and KingMed Diagnostics in China. J Pathol Inform. 2015;6:63.
Chen J, et al. A nationwide telepathology consultation and quality control program in China: implementation and result analysis. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9(Suppl 1):S2.
Nahal A, et al. Setting up an ePathology Service at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi: Joint Collaboration With Cleveland Clinic, United States. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(10):1216–22.
Abels E, Pantanowitz L. Current state of the regulatory trajectory for whole slide imaging devices in the USA. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8:23.
Leung, S. and T. Allen, Legal/Regulatory. 2016. in Digital pathology, K.J. Kaplan, L.K.F. Rao (eds.): p. 79–86.
Cornish TC, McClintock DS. Medicolegal and regulatory aspects of whole slide imaging-based telepathology. Diagn Histopathol. 2014;21(12):475–81.
Hiemenz MC, Leung ST, Park JY. Crossing boundaries: a comprehensive survey of medical licensing laws and guidelines regulating the interstate practice of pathology. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(3):e1–5.
Li KC, et al. Digitization of medicine: how radiology can take advantage of the digital revolution. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(12):1479–94.
Renshaw AA, Lezon KM, Wilbur DC. The human false-negative rate of rescreening pap tests. Measured in a two-arm prospective clinical trial. Cancer. 2001;93(2):106–10.
Ho J, et al. Use of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology quality assurance: design and pilot validation studies. Hum Pathol. 2006;37(3):322–31.
Crothers BA. Cytologic-histologic correlation: where are we now, and where are we going? Cancer Cytopathol. 2018;126(5):301–8.
Sirintrapun SJ, et al. Successful secure high-definition streaming telecytology for remote cytologic evaluation. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8:33.
Sirintrapun SJ, et al. Robotic telecytology for remote cytologic evaluation without an on-site cytotechnologist or cytopathologist: an active quality assessment and experience of over 400 cases. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8:35.
Van Es SL, et al. Constant quest for quality: digital cytopathology. J Pathol Inform. 2018;9:13.
Janowczyk A, Basavanhally A, Madabhushi A. Stain normalization using sparse AutoEncoders (StaNoSA): application to digital pathology. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2017;57:50–61.
Kather JN, et al. New colors for histology: optimized bivariate color maps increase perceptual contrast in histological images. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145572.
Shin D, et al. PathEdEx - uncovering high-explanatory visual diagnostics heuristics using digital pathology and multiscale gaze data. J Pathol Inform. 2017;8:29.
Brunye TT, et al. Eye movements as an index of pathologist visual expertise: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e103447.
Brunye TT, et al. Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: the visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images. J Biomed Inform. 2017;66:171–9.
Schaumberg AJ, et al. DeepScope: nonintrusive whole slide saliency annotation and prediction from pathologists at the microscope. Comput Intell Methods Bioinform Biostat (2016). 2017;10477:42–58.
Mercan E, et al. Localization of diagnostically relevant regions of interest in whole slide images: a comparative study. J Digit Imaging. 2016;29(4):496–506.
Zheng Y, et al. Histopathological whole slide image analysis using context-based CBIR. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37(7):1641–52.
L., P., Turning research repository images into gold: winning strategies for funding WSI research infrastructure & programs. Pathology Informatics Summit 2018. 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raess, P.W., Sirintrapun, S.J. (2022). Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement Enabled by Whole Slide Imaging. In: Parwani, A.V. (eds) Whole Slide Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83332-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83332-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-83331-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-83332-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)