Skip to main content

The Art of the Scholar: Oakeshott’s Conservative Account of Liberal Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oakeshott’s Skepticism, Politics, and Aesthetics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism ((PASTCL))

Abstract

There is an overlap between the activity of the politician and that of the scholar, both of them being engaged in a certain form of tradition-based activity. Oakeshott’s description of the figure of the scholar is in fact a counterpoint to that of the rationalist. Beyond a professional knowledge, the scholar is characterized by a certain civilized way of life. Relying on his early essays on the university, the argument presents the political background of Oakeshott’s stress on practical knowledge and develops a comparison to show how practical knowledge operates in science, religion, art and cookery, stressing the conservative components and aesthetic qualities of these practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Michael Oakeshott, The Voice of Liberal Learning, ed. and intr. Timothy Fuller (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001, originally published by Yale University, 1989).

  2. 2.

    See Dror Wahrman, Imagining the Middle Class: The Political Representation of Class in Britain, c. 1780–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995); Simon Gunn, and Rachel Bell, Middle Classes: Their Rise and Sprawl (London: Phoenix, 2003).

  3. 3.

    For an explication of bildung’s relevance for conservatism, see the present author’s paper: Ferenc Hörcher, “Culture, Self-Formation and Community-Building: The Bildungsideal from the Perspective of the Intellectual History of Civil Sociability,” Ethos: Kwartalnik Instytutu Jana Pawla II, KUL 28, no.109 (2015), 64–83.

  4. 4.

    Bruce Truscot, and Edgar Allison Peers, Red Brick University (London: Faber & Faber, 1943)

  5. 5.

    Michael Oakeshott, “The Universities,” in Oakeshott, Liberal Learning, 118–158, 120, 138.

  6. 6.

    Sir John Henry Newman, The Idea of a University (1852, 1858), available online at: http://www.newmanreader.org/works/idea/

  7. 7.

    Sir Walter Moberly, The Crisis in the Universities (London: SCM Press, 1949).

  8. 8.

    Michael Oakeshott, “Rationalism in Politics,” in: Michael Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, new and expanded edition (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1991), 5–42., 6–7.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., 9.

  10. 10.

    Michael Oakeshott, The Social and Political Doctrines of Contemporary Europe, with five additional prefaces by F.A. Ogg (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1942).

  11. 11.

    As we shall see, Oakeshott presents his ideal of the scientist in opposition to the “rationalist” scientist.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., 13, n4. and n5. Oakeshott explicitly refers to Polányi’s work: Science, Faith and Society (1946). One can see the relationship of Oakeshott’s emphasis on practical knowledge and Polányi’s notion of tacit knowledge, as presented in Michael Polányi, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).

  13. 13.

    Ibid., 13.

  14. 14.

    See for example his “The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind,” in Rationalism in Politics, 488–541. For the present author’s account of Oakeshott’s views on the voice of poetry see Ferenc Hörcher, “‘A brief enchantment’: Oakeshott’s account of the role of conversation and poetry in human life,” in The Meanings of Michael Oakeshott’s Conservatism, ed. Corey Abel (Exeter: Imprint-academic.com, 2010), 238–254.

  15. 15.

    Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics, 13.

  16. 16.

    Ibid., 15.

  17. 17.

    Michael Oakeshott, “Learning and Teaching,” in Oakeshott, Liberal Learning, 35–61, 60.

  18. 18.

    Of course, Geist has a metaphysical meaning in German classical idealism, famously represented in the work of Hegel. The notion of spirit does not give back the full range of the meanings of Geist in ordinary English.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., 51.

  20. 20.

    Michael Oakeshot, “The Idea of a University,” in Oakeshott, Liberal Learning, 105–117, 116.

  21. 21.

    Oakeshott, “The Idea of a University,” 114.

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

  24. 24.

    Oakeshott, “The Universities,” 158.

  25. 25.

    Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France, copyright © Jonathan Bennett, 2017, available at: https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/burke1790part1.pdf, 34.

  26. 26.

    For another defence of cultural conservatism, see Roger Scruton, The Politics of Culture and Other Essays (Manchester, Carcanet, 1981).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferenc Hörcher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hörcher, F. (2022). The Art of the Scholar: Oakeshott’s Conservative Account of Liberal Learning. In: Kos, E.S. (eds) Oakeshott’s Skepticism, Politics, and Aesthetics. Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83055-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics