Abstract
Special Education (SPED) teachers interact with mathematics in two distinct ways. First, math is necessary to operationalize the field. This includes the interpretation of various psychological assessments using statistical analyses in order to advocate alongside vulnerable students. Second, teachers also must deliver mathematics instruction in a way that is consistent with best practices. In order to satisfy these two mathematical attributes of the field, assessment, and content delivery, teachers possess an understanding of their own as well as their students’ ability to engage in mathematics To support teachers, teacher education in the field of special education must promote conceptual understanding and mathematical teaching practices and help students understand that math can be a tool for “reading and writing the world.” In this chapter, we describe an approach to teacher education in the field of special education that empowers pre-service teachers to consider mathematics as a tool toward liberatory practices instead of mathematics as a performance-based and gate-keeping subject. We start by outlining the critical disability perspective and the existing literature on the nature of mathematics teaching and learning. The chapter ends with a model of pre-service special educator mathematics and mathematics education curriculum.
References
Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2022). Statement on equitable and inclusive mathematics teaching and learning. AMTE. https://amte.net/sites/amte.net/files/AMTE%20Statement%20April%202022.pdf
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Bennett, L. (1972). The challenge of blackness. Johnson Publishing Company.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
Davis, L. J. (2017). Introduction: Disability, normality, and power. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (5th ed., pp. 1–14). Routledge.
Dinkelman, T. (2009). Reflection and resistance: The challenge of rationale-based teacher education. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 2(1), 91–108.
Dweck, C. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Ballantine Books.
Ferguson, D. (1995). The real challenge of inclusion: Confessions of a “rabid inclusionist”. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(4), 281–287.
Gal, I. (2005). Towards “probability literacy” for all citizens: building blocks and instructional dilemmas. In Jones, G. A. (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 39–63). Springer.
Greenstein, S., & Baglieri, S. (2018). Imagining mathematical thinking for inclusive curriculum: A conversation. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 133–144.
Gresham, G. (2018). Preservice to inservice: Does mathematics anxiety change with teaching experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702580
Gutierrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.
Gutierrez, R. (2018). The need to rehumanize mathematics. In I. Goffney, R. Gutierrez, & M. Boston (Eds.), Rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students (pp. 1–10). NCTM.
Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. Routledge.
Hawley, T. S. (2010). Purpose into practice: The problems and possibilities of rationale-based practice in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 38(1), 298–316.
Hawley, T. S. (2012). Purpose as content and pedagogy: Rationale-development as a core theme of social studies teacher education. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 4(3), 1–17.
Hawley, T. S., Pifel, A. R., & Jordan, A. W. (2012). Structure, citizenship, and professionalism: Exploring rationale development as part of graduate education in social studies. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 36(3), 245–262.
Hawley, T. S., Levicky, M., & Jordan, A. W. (2019). Purpose matters in teaching: Leveraging purpose to transform teaching and learning. Teaching Social Studies, 19(2), 15–20.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
Jordan, A. W., Jordan, K. H., & Hawley, T. S. (2017). Purpose and passion: The rationales of public alternative school teachers. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 41(4), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2017.01.004
Lambert, R., & Tan, P. (2017). Conceptualizations of students with and without disabilities as mathematical problem solvers in educational research: A critical review. Education Sciences, 7(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020051
Levinson, R., Kent, P., Pratt, D., Kapadia, R., & Yogui, C. (2012). Risk-based decision making in a scientific issue: A study of teachers discussing a dilemma through a microworld. Science Education, 96(2), 212–233.
Murphy, P., Lunn, S., & Jones, H. (2007). The impact of authentic learning on students’ engagement with physics. The Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 229–246.
National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Executive summary. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PtAExecutiveSummary.pdf
ndunda, m., & Radakovic, N. (2020). Standardization and borders in mathematics pre-service teacher education: A duoethnographic exploration. In N. Radakovic & L. Jao (Eds.), Borders in mathematics pre-service teacher education (pp. 267–277). Springer.
Newmann, F. M. (1970). Clarifying public controversy: An approach to teaching social studies. Little, Brown, and Company.
Newmann, F. M. (1977). Building a rationale for civic education. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Building rationales for citizenship education. National Council for the Social Studies.
Nielsen, K. E. (2012). A disability history of the United States. Beacon Press.
Ruttenberg-Rozen, R. (2020). A wonder-full task leads to a wonder-full intervention. The Mathematics Teacher, 113(6), 474–479.
Shakespeare, T. (2017). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (5th ed., pp. 195–203). Routledge.
Shaver, J. P. (1977). The task of rationale-building for citizenship education. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Building rationales for citizenship education (pp. 96–116). National Council for the Social Studies.
Shaver, J. P., & Strong, W. (1982). Facing value decisions: Rationale-building for teachers. Teachers College Press.
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards philosophy of critical mathematics education. Kluwer.
Su, F. (2020). Mathematics for human flourishing. Yale University Press.
Swain, K. D., & Hagaman, J. L. (2020). Elementary special education teachers’ use of CBM data: A 20-year follow-up. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2019.1678009
Tan, P., Padilla, A., Mason, E. N., & Sheldon, J. (2019). Humanizing disability in mathematics education: Forging new paths. NCTM.
Weiland, T. (2017). Problematizing statistical literacy: An intersection of critical and statistical literacies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 33–47.
Yeh, C., Ellis, M. W., & Koehn Hurtado, C. (2017). Reimagining mathematics classroom. NCTM.
Yeh, C., Sugita, T., & Tan, P. (2020). Reimagining inclusive spaces for mathematics learning. Mathematics Teacher, 113(9), 708–714.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Jordan, A.W., Radakovic, N. (2023). Mathematics as Praxis: Reconceptualizing the Role of Mathematics in the Pre-service Special Educator Curriculum. In: Trifonas, P.P., Jagger, S. (eds) Handbook of Curriculum Theory and Research. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82976-6_25-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82976-6_25-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82976-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82976-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education