Skip to main content

Mathematics as Praxis: Reconceptualizing the Role of Mathematics in the Pre-service Special Educator Curriculum

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Curriculum Theory and Research

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

Special Education (SPED) teachers interact with mathematics in two distinct ways. First, math is necessary to operationalize the field. This includes the interpretation of various psychological assessments using statistical analyses in order to advocate alongside vulnerable students. Second, teachers also must deliver mathematics instruction in a way that is consistent with best practices. In order to satisfy these two mathematical attributes of the field, assessment, and content delivery, teachers possess an understanding of their own as well as their students’ ability to engage in mathematics To support teachers, teacher education in the field of special education must promote conceptual understanding and mathematical teaching practices and help students understand that math can be a tool for “reading and writing the world.” In this chapter, we describe an approach to teacher education in the field of special education that empowers pre-service teachers to consider mathematics as a tool toward liberatory practices instead of mathematics as a performance-based and gate-keeping subject. We start by outlining the critical disability perspective and the existing literature on the nature of mathematics teaching and learning. The chapter ends with a model of pre-service special educator mathematics and mathematics education curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2022). Statement on equitable and inclusive mathematics teaching and learning. AMTE. https://amte.net/sites/amte.net/files/AMTE%20Statement%20April%202022.pdf

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. (1972). The challenge of blackness. Johnson Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (2017). Introduction: Disability, normality, and power. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (5th ed., pp. 1–14). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelman, T. (2009). Reflection and resistance: The challenge of rationale-based teacher education. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 2(1), 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (2007). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, D. (1995). The real challenge of inclusion: Confessions of a “rabid inclusionist”. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(4), 281–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2005). Towards “probability literacy” for all citizens: building blocks and instructional dilemmas. In Jones, G. A. (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 39–63). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, S., & Baglieri, S. (2018). Imagining mathematical thinking for inclusive curriculum: A conversation. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 10(3), 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, G. (2018). Preservice to inservice: Does mathematics anxiety change with teaching experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, R. (2018). The need to rehumanize mathematics. In I. Goffney, R. Gutierrez, & M. Boston (Eds.), Rehumanizing mathematics for Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students (pp. 1–10). NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, T. S. (2010). Purpose into practice: The problems and possibilities of rationale-based practice in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 38(1), 298–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, T. S. (2012). Purpose as content and pedagogy: Rationale-development as a core theme of social studies teacher education. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 4(3), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, T. S., Pifel, A. R., & Jordan, A. W. (2012). Structure, citizenship, and professionalism: Exploring rationale development as part of graduate education in social studies. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 36(3), 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, T. S., Levicky, M., & Jordan, A. W. (2019). Purpose matters in teaching: Leveraging purpose to transform teaching and learning. Teaching Social Studies, 19(2), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. W., Jordan, K. H., & Hawley, T. S. (2017). Purpose and passion: The rationales of public alternative school teachers. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 41(4), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2017.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, R., & Tan, P. (2017). Conceptualizations of students with and without disabilities as mathematical problem solvers in educational research: A critical review. Education Sciences, 7(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7020051

  • Levinson, R., Kent, P., Pratt, D., Kapadia, R., & Yogui, C. (2012). Risk-based decision making in a scientific issue: A study of teachers discussing a dilemma through a microworld. Science Education, 96(2), 212–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., Lunn, S., & Jones, H. (2007). The impact of authentic learning on students’ engagement with physics. The Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Executive summary. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PtAExecutiveSummary.pdf

  • ndunda, m., & Radakovic, N. (2020). Standardization and borders in mathematics pre-service teacher education: A duoethnographic exploration. In N. Radakovic & L. Jao (Eds.), Borders in mathematics pre-service teacher education (pp. 267–277). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M. (1970). Clarifying public controversy: An approach to teaching social studies. Little, Brown, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M. (1977). Building a rationale for civic education. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Building rationales for citizenship education. National Council for the Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K. E. (2012). A disability history of the United States. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttenberg-Rozen, R. (2020). A wonder-full task leads to a wonder-full intervention. The Mathematics Teacher, 113(6), 474–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2017). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (5th ed., pp. 195–203). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. P. (1977). The task of rationale-building for citizenship education. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Building rationales for citizenship education (pp. 96–116). National Council for the Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. P., & Strong, W. (1982). Facing value decisions: Rationale-building for teachers. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards philosophy of critical mathematics education. Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Su, F. (2020). Mathematics for human flourishing. Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, K. D., & Hagaman, J. L. (2020). Elementary special education teachers’ use of CBM data: A 20-year follow-up. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2019.1678009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, P., Padilla, A., Mason, E. N., & Sheldon, J. (2019). Humanizing disability in mathematics education: Forging new paths. NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland, T. (2017). Problematizing statistical literacy: An intersection of critical and statistical literacies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C., Ellis, M. W., & Koehn Hurtado, C. (2017). Reimagining mathematics classroom. NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, C., Sugita, T., & Tan, P. (2020). Reimagining inclusive spaces for mathematics learning. Mathematics Teacher, 113(9), 708–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nenad Radakovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jordan, A.W., Radakovic, N. (2023). Mathematics as Praxis: Reconceptualizing the Role of Mathematics in the Pre-service Special Educator Curriculum. In: Trifonas, P.P., Jagger, S. (eds) Handbook of Curriculum Theory and Research. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82976-6_25-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82976-6_25-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82976-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82976-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics