Skip to main content

Introduction: Towards a Multi-Faceted Approach to Politicisation in the EU Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tracing the Politicisation of the EU

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

Abstract

In recent years, internal European Union (EU) debates on migration, Brexit, the Eurozone, trade and the rule of law, among others, have focused on the legitimacy of the EU and the dissatisfaction of European citizens vis-à-vis the European project. The introduction to this book lays out the relevance of conceptual, empirical, and normative perspectives on EU politicisation, which has often been addressed by scholars in a rather negative light. Far from being a ‘descriptive’ and only ‘empirical’ approach, the introduction aims to re-conceptualise the understanding of EU politicisation by shifting the attention away from the traditional consensus-oriented understanding of European integration. Bringing together different disciplinary approaches, the introduction puts forward an innovative and politically aware attempt to conceive politicisation in a multi-faceted and heterogenous way. Lastly, we describe the narrative and design of the book, introducing each of the chapters that compose the three thematic clusters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aalberts, T. E. (2005). Future of sovereignty in multilevel governance Europe—A constructivist reading. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aalberts, T. E. (2012). Constructing sovereignty between politics and law. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, C., & Bijsmans, P. (2018). The Maastricht Treaty and public debates about European integration: The emergence of a European public sphere? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(2), 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bee, C. (2014). Transnationalisation, public communication and active citizenship. The emergence of a fragmented and fluid European public sphere. Sociology Compass, 8(8), 1018–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R. (2013). ‘An ever closer union among the peoples of Europe’: Republican Intergovernmentalism and Demoicratic Representation within the EU. Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 499–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouza, L., & Oleart, A. (2018). From the 2005 constitution’s ‘permissive consensus’ to TTIP’s ‘empowering dissensus’: The EU as a playing field for Spanish civil society. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 14(2), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouza García, L. (2017). The ‘new narrative project’ and the politicisation of the EU. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 25(3), 340–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, J., & Flinders, M. (2005). The domestic origins of depoliticisation in the area of British economic policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(4), 526–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, P. (2001). New labour and the politics of depoliticisation. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 3(2), 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 67–91). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, M., & Oleart, A. (2020). Framing TTIP in the wake of the greenpeace leaks: Agonistic and deliberative perspectives on frame resonance and communicative power. Journal of European Integration, 42(4), 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2020, June 24). Conference on the future of Europe: Council position. 24 June 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/44679/st09102-en20.pdf.

  • De Wilde, P., Leupold, A., & Schmidtke, H. (Eds.). (2018). The differentiated politicization of European governance. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, P., & Lord, C. (2016). Assessing actually-existing trajectories of EU politicisation. West European Politics, 39(1), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne, S., & Haegel, F. (2004). La politisation des discussions, au croisement des logiques de spécialisation et de conflictualisation. Revue Française De Science Politique, 54(6), 877–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, E. O. (1999). The question of deliberative supranationalism in the EU (ARENA Working Papers WP 99/4). Retrieved June 15, 2020, from http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/wp99_4.htm.

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2007). Special section: Transnational public sphere: Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, S., Grande, E., & Kriesi, H. (Eds.). (2016). Politicising Europe. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, N. (2018). Toward a reflexive political sociology of the European Union: Fields, intellectuals and politicians. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, N., Palonen, K., & Wiesner, C. (2016). The Politification and politicisation of the EU. Redescriptions, 19(1), 72–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (Eds.). (2010). The making of a European public sphere: Media discourse and political contention. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2002). In defence of the ‘democratic deficit’: Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleart, A. (2021). Framing TTIP in the European public spheres: Towards an empowering dissensus for EU integration. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleart, A., & Bouza, L. (2018). Democracy at stake: Multipositional actors and politicization in the EU civil society field. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(4), 870–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, K. (2019). Politicisation: Disorder or chance? From literary to parliamentary debates. Contemporary Political Theory, 18(2), 248–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2010). A community of Europeans? Transnational identities and public spheres? Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, S. (2013). Is there a sovereignty problem in the EU? Sciencespo Grenoble Centre de Documentation. Retrieved June 3, 2021, from https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/SCPO-GRENOBLE/halshs-00911482v1.

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and national polities. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2007). Paradiastole: Redescribing the vices as virtues. In S. Adamson, G. Alexander, & K. Ettenhuber (Eds.), Renaissance figures of speech (pp. 149–164). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statham, P., & Trenz, H.-J. (2015). Understanding the mechanisms of EU politicization: Lessons from the Eurozone crisis. Comparative European Politics, 13(3), 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, C. (2013). The struggle for EU legitimacy: Public contestation, 1950–2005. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, H.-J., & Eder, K. (2004). The democratizing dynamics of a European public sphere: Towards a theory of democratic functionalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 7(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, C. (2019). Inventing the EU as a democratic polity: Concepts, actors and controversies. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, C. (Ed.). (2021). Rethinking politicisation in politics, sociology and international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, C., Haapala, T., & Palonen, K. (2017). Debates, rhetoric and political action. Practices of textual interpretation and analysis. Rhetoric, politics and society. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woll, C., & Jacquot, S. (2010). Using Europe: Strategic action in multi-level politics. Comparative European Politics, 8(1), 110–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Álvaro Oleart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oleart, Á., Haapala, T. (2022). Introduction: Towards a Multi-Faceted Approach to Politicisation in the EU Context. In: Haapala, T., Oleart, Á. (eds) Tracing the Politicisation of the EU. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82700-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics