Abstract
Ancient faiths, centered on divinely animated idols, provided reassuring answers to their followers. In modern times, the search for ultimate answers has fragmented into politics, consumerism and psychology; our new idols are charismatic leaders and the pinups of popular entertainment. A religious definition of idols might be “objects of intense devotional focus.” Another definition might be “objects of hallucinatory focus.” It is this latter description, inspired by Julian Jaynes, that this chapter highlights. Jaynes argued that during the Bronze Age people experienced audiovisual hallucinations that directed and governed behavior and emanated from figurines. This explains why their texts are replete with numerous accounts of divine visitations. By the first millennium BCE godly voices and visions faded into history as sociopolitical complexity configured a new mentality making hallucinations obsolete. Using Jaynes’s arguments, this chapter provides a cursory review of how throughout the ages, idols have been adored, admired and worshipped, as well as viewed with suspicion, leading to prohibitions against their use and aniconism. They have also triggered hallucinations. Jaynes’s contentions fit into a larger theoretical framework of how cognition and material culture co-constitute each other. Such a perspective challenges dualistic accounts of mind-versus-materiality and individual-versus-environment interactions, informing us about how individual and object are sociopsychologically enmeshed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The original has been lost.
- 2.
United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing.
- 3.
Ann Lee, 1736–1784. See Lamson 1848 for a brief description.
- 4.
Cf. Bateson: Mental characteristics of the system are “immanent, not in some part, but in the system as a whole” (Bateson 1973: 316).
- 5.
This list of examples is borrowed from Chemero and Silberstein 2010.
- 6.
Cf. Knappett: Agency “comes to be distributed across a network, inhering in the association and relationships between entities, rather than in the entities themselves” (Knappett 2005: 100).
- 7.
There is a tradition of thinkers who have challenged anthropocentric idea of agency, each in their own way, for example, Appadurai 1986; Gell 1998; Heidegger 1977; Law 1999; Mauss 1954. From the perspective of actor-network theory, Bruno Latour has conceptualized agency as distributed throughout relational networks of persons and things (Latour 1999). Actors and agents are both products of effects and of networks; the human actor lacks primacy over non-human actors.
- 8.
Conscious interiority is a package of features and functions: mind-space, mental imagery, introception, excerption, self-narratization, self-autonomy, self-authorization, conciliation, individuation, self-reflexivity, suppression and concentration.
- 9.
For the sake of space I refrain from explaining in detail the nuances of Jaynesian psychology. A number of articles and books have already summarized, explored and applied Jaynes’s theories. The best introduction to Jaynes’s theories is his own writings (Jaynes 1976). See also Kuijsten 2006, 2012, 2016; McVeigh 2000, 2016a, b, c, d, 2018, 2020. The interested reader is also directed to the Julian Jaynes Society, where a wealth of research, resources and relevant materials can be found. See www.julianjaynes.org.
- 10.
With a possible etymological connection to the Hittite tarpi(š).
- 11.
Though Islam’s aniconism is strict, this did not stop the stunning fluorescence of its visual arts.
- 12.
Though the term “idol” usually connotes a concrete, tangible iconicity, through the centuries it has been borrowed to refer to intangible fixations or fallacies, for example, the “false idols” as used by Francis Bacon (1561–1626) that meant intellectual misconceptions. An example of super-abstract idolization is scientism or the belief that science will provide the ultimate answers to life’s most vexing and haunting existentialist questions.
References
Aoyagi Hiroshi. 2005. Islands of Eight Million Smiles: Idol Performance and Symbolic Production in Contemporary Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bateson, Gregory. 1973. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Granada.
Chemero, Anthony, and Michael Silberstein. 2010. Defending Extended Cognition. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3204/.
Clancey, William J. 1997. Situated Cognition. On Human Knowledge and Computer Representation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Andy. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
———. 2003. Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
———. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. The Extended Mind. Analysis 58: 7–23.
Freedberg, David. 1985. Iconoclasts and Their Motives. Maarssen, Germany: Schwartz.
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row.
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jaynes, Julian. 1976. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Knappett, Carl. 2005. Thinking Through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Knight, Douglas A. 1993. Idols, Idolatry. In The Oxford Companion to the Bible, eds. Bruce M. Metzger and Michael D. Coogan, 297–298. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kuijsten, Marcel. 2006. Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness: Julian Jaynes’s Bicameral Mind Theory Revisited. Henderson, Nevada: Julian Jaynes Society.
———. 2012. The Julian Jaynes Collection. Henderson, Nevada: Julian Jaynes Society.
———. 2016. Gods, Voices, and the Bicameral Mind. Henderson, Nevada: Julian Jaynes Society.
Lamson, David. 1848. Two Years’ Experience Among the Shakers. Self-published.
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Law, John. 1999. After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology. In Actor Network Theory and After, ed. John Law and John Hassard, 1–14. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
Malafouris, Lambros. 2013. How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Marsh, Leslie. 2005. Review of Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence (Andy Clark). Cognitive Systems Research 6: 405–409.
Mauss, Marcel. 1954. The Gift. London: Cohen and West.
McClamrock, Ron. 1995. Existential Cognition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McVeigh, Brian J. 2000. How Hello Kitty Commodifies the Cute, Cool, and Camp: ‘Consumutopia’ versus ‘Control’ in Japan. Journal of Material Culture 5 (2): 225–245.
———. 2016a. How Religion Evolved: The Living Dead, Talking Idols, and Mesmerizing Monuments. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
———. 2016b. A Psychohistory of Metaphors: Envisioning Time, Space, and Self through the Centuries. Boulder, CO: Lexington Books.
———. 2016c. Discussions with Julian Jaynes: The Nature of Consciousness and the Vagaries of Psychology. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers.
———. 2016d. The History of Japanese Psychology: Global Perspectives, 1875–1950. London: Bloomsbury.
———. 2018. The “Other Psychology” of Julian Jaynes: Ancient Languages, Sacred Visions, and Forgotten Mentalities. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.
———. 2020. The Psychology of the Bible: Explaining Divine Voices and Visions. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.
Noë, Alva. 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, Evan, and Francisco J. Varela. 2001. Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 418–425.
Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wilson, Robert A. 2004. Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McVeigh, B.J. (2021). Idols that Speak: How Psyche and Material Culture Co-construct Each Other. In: Hiroshi, A., Galbraith, P.W., Kovacic, M. (eds) Idology in Transcultural Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82677-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82677-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82676-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82677-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)