Abstract
The United States relies on the Child Protective Service (CPS) system to protect children from abuse and neglect. The foundation of this system is reporting—reporting is supposed to bring maltreated children to the attention of CPS and CPS is supposed to appropriately respond to the report. This chapter examines trends in CPS reporting, the evidence that maltreated children are reported and receive CPS attention, and current issues affecting this system. Beginning with the history and current status of mandatory reporting laws, it describes the challenges involved in studying mandatory reporting and the limitations of the existing evidence. Subsequent sections summarize research on reports CPS receives and how CPS responds; on the maltreated children mandated reporters encounter, whether these children receive CPS investigation, and why they may not; and on the mandated reporters—who doesn’t report and why. The chapter then considers current issues and trends, including the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and of racial inequities on reporting and the use of data-driven approaches to understand reporting patterns and manage screening of referrals and responses to reports. The conclusion discusses the failures of mandated reporting and recent system reform efforts that may dramatically alter reporting trends in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
States frequently amend their laws (Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2019a).
- 2.
Screened-out referrals are only tabulated in the NCANDS Agency File, which does not provide unique records for them. They are not in the Child File at all.
- 3.
Used random assignment and a true experimental design
- 4.
In this graph, a victim is defined as a child whose disposition was substantiated, indicated, or alternative response victim. The overall maltreatment lines depict NCANDS changing measures over the years. Most victims (96% in 2019) have substantiated maltreatment (US DHHS 2020). The duplicated counts include children as many times as they were the subject of a report over the year. The unique counts include a child just once regardless of the number of reports that included them. In 2018, NCANDS excluded alternative response victims from its victimization tabulation, giving the adjusted data for several retrospective years, as graphed. The rates given here for the component categories through 2008, are duplicated rates. The unduplicated rates, which count each child victim just once, are available in NCANDS publications for 2005 and later (US DHHS 2010b, 2011, 2012). Beginning in 2018, NCANDS report introduced another modification, providing a category of multiple maltreatment and redefining the component maltreatment categories to include only children who experienced that single form of maltreatment. For definitional consistency, Fig. 1.1 does not use the NCANDS 2018 and 2019 data for the component categories. We are indebted to Finkelhor et al. (2020, 2021) for sharing special tabulations that they obtained from NCANDS to complete the 2018–2019 entries using the earlier definitions (i.e., including all children who experienced any component maltreatment regardless of other maltreatment events).
- 5.
The NIS follows the usage of CAPTA in referring to its findings as “incidence estimates.” In the epidemiological literature, however, they would be more appropriately termed “annual prevalence estimates.” Technically, they are period prevalence estimates, where the focal period is a year.
- 6.
- 7.
The authors conducted additional analyses, not published elsewhere, which show that, whereas the rate of sexual abuse decreased at all levels of severity, the rates of physical and emotional abuse significantly decreased only for moderately harmed or endangered children—not for those seriously harmed.
- 8.
NCANDS does not distinguish between emotional abuse and emotional neglect.
- 9.
Between 1995 and 2015, rates of domestic violence victimization decreased from 15.5 per 1000 women and 2.8 per 1000 men to 5.4 per 1000 women and 0.5 per 1000 men (Smith et al., 2018), further suggesting that the increase in children exposed to domestic violence comes from an increased awareness of this as a maltreatment subcategory.
- 10.
These include other governmental social service agencies, other (non-sentinel) professionals or agencies (e.g., community health clinics not affiliated with a hospital, private practice pediatricians, physicians, therapists) and all other sources (primarily the general public, such as neighbors, friends, family, anonymous callers, and the victims themselves).
- 11.
The percentages shown in Fig. 1.2 display a best-case scenario in that they assume that all the children in these jurisdictions would have met the agency’s criteria for assignment to the alternative response track.
- 12.
In NIS, “other” sentinels were employees with direct service responsibilities at day care centers, shelters, public housing, social services, and mental health services.
- 13.
This study also demonstrated how the legal implications of failing to report can affect responses; some clinicians changed their original opinion that an injury was caused by abuse when explaining why they did not report the case to CPS.
- 14.
Disproportionality is the underrepresentation or overrepresentation of a racial or ethnic group compared to its percentage in the total population. Disparity is the unequal outcomes of one racial or ethnic group as compared to outcomes for another racial/ethnic group (Child Welfare Information Gateway, 2016b).
- 15.
These same sources show that the disproportionality has been decreasing, with the percentage of Black children decreasing among victims in CPS investigation from 22.3% in 2009 to 20.8% in 2018 and decreasing among foster care children from 30% in 2009 to 23% in 2018.
References
Administration for Children & Families. (2020a). Foster care as a support to families. Informational Memo ACYF-CB-IM-20-06. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cb/im2006.pdf
Administration for Children & Families. (2020b, December 9). First-of-its-kind national partnership aims to redesign child welfare into child- and family well-being systems [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/media/press/2020/first-of-its-kind-national-partnership-aims-to-redesign-child-welfare-into-child-and-family-well-being-systems
American Public Human Services Association (APHSA). (2010). Positioning public child welfare guidance: communications guidance. American Public Human Services Association. Available at: http://ncwwi.org/files/PPCW_Strategic_Partnerships_Guidance.pdf
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2020). Child population by race in the United States. Kids Count Data Center. Available at https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/103-child-population-by-race#detailed/1/any/false/1729,37,871,870,573,869,36,868,867,133/68,69,67,12,70,66,71,72/423,424
Ashton, V. (1999). Worker judgments of seriousness about and reporting of suspected child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23(6), 539–548.
Ashton, V. (2004). The effect of personal characteristics on reporting child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(9), 985–997.
Ashton, V. (2010). Does ethnicity matter? Social workers’ personal attitudes and professional behaviors in responding to child maltreatment. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 129–143.
Baron, E. J., Goldstein, E. G., & Wallace, C.. Suffering in silence: How COVID-19 school closures inhibit the reporting of child maltreatment (July 29, 2020). Journal of Public Economics. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3601399
Barth, R. P., & Price, A. (1999). Shared family care: providing services to parents and children placed together in out-of-home care. Child Welfare, 78(1), 88–107.
Barth, R. P., Jonson-Reid, M., Greeson, J. K., Drake, B., Berrick, J. D., Garcia, A. R., et al. (2020). Outcomes following child welfare services: what are they and do they differ for black children? Journal of Public Child Welfare, 14(5), 477–499.
Bluestone, C. (2005). Personal disciplinary history and views of physical punishment: Implications for training mandated reporters. Child Abuse Review: Journal of the British Association for the Study and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, 14(4), 240–258.
Bonk, K., Monihan, K., Combs, C., Omang, J., Mattingly, J., Goodhand, J., Good, M., Knipp, M., & Vincent, P. (2001). Strategic communications: Media relations for child welfare. Annie E. Casey Foundation, Family to Family Tools for Rebuilding Foster Care.
Bragg, H. L. (2003). Child protection in families experiencing domestic violence. US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, Children’s Bureau, Office on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Brooks-Gunn, J., Schneider, W., & Waldfogel, J. (2013). The Great Recession and the risk for child maltreatment. Child Abuse and Neglect, 37(10), 721–729.
Bryant, J. K. (2009). School counselors and child abuse reporting: A national survey. Professional School Counseling, 12(5), 2156759X0901200501.
Bullinger, L., Raissian, K., Feely, M., & Schneider, W. (2020). The neglected ones: Time at home during COVID-19 and child maltreatment. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674064.
Carleton, R. A. (2006). Does the mandate make a difference? Reporting decisions in emotional abuse. Child Abuse Review, 15, 19–37.
Carson, E. A. (2020). Prisoners in 2019. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, NCJ 255115. Appendix Table 1. Available at https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p19.pdf
Center for the Study of Social Policy. (2018, February 16). Keeping Families Together: Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) aligns financing with child wellbeing. Available at https://cssp.org/about-us/connect/press-room/keeping-families-together-family-first-prevention-services-act-ffpsa-aligns-financing-with-child-wellbeing/
Chambers, R. M., Brocato, J., Fatemi, M., & Rodriguez, A. Y. (2016). An innovative child welfare pilot initiative: Results and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 143–151.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2016a). Child witnesses to domestic violence. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2016b). Racial disproportionality and disparity in child welfare. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2019a). Mandatory reporters of child abuse and neglect. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2019b). Definitions of child abuse and neglect. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2019c). Penalties for failure to report and false reporting of child abuse and neglect. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau.
Childhelp.org. The importance of this April and the coronavirus pandemic. Scottsdale, AZ: Childhelp.org. March 31, 2020. Available at https://www.childhelp.org/the-importance-of-this-april-and-the-coronavirus-pandemic/
Children’s Bureau. (2020). Data & Research: Child Maltreatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.
Chouldechova, A., Benavides-Prado, D., Fialko, O., & Vaithianathan, R. (2018). A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (pp. 134–148). Available at http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/chouldechova18a
Conti, S. (2011). Lawyers and mental health professionals working together: Reconciling the duties of confidentiality and mandatory child abuse reporting. Family Court Review, 49(2), 388–399.
Dettlaff, A. J., Weber, K., Pendleton, M., Boyd, R., Bettencourt, B., & Burton, L. (2020). It is not a broken system, it is a system that needs to be broken: the upEND movement to abolish the child welfare system. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 14(5), 500–517.
Dixon, J. W., & Dixon, K. E. (2007). Attorney-client privilege versus mandatory reporting by psychologists: dilemma, conflict, and solution. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6(4), 69–78.
Drake, B., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2011). NIS interpretations: Race and the national incidence studies of child abuse and neglect. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(1), 16–20.
Dumbrill, G. (2006). Parental experience of child protection intervention: A qualitative study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 27–37.
Edleson, J. L. (1999). Children’s witnessing of adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 839–870.
Egu, C. L., & Weiss, D. J. (2003). The role of race and severity of abuse in teachers’ recognition or reporting of child abuse. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(4), 465–474.
Environmental Systems Research Institute. (n.d.). What is GIS?. Retrieved January 15, 2021, from https://www.esri.com/en-us/what-is-gis/overview
Etienne, J. (2010). The impact of regulatory policy on individual behaviour: a goal framing theory approach (No. DP 59). Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Finkelhor, D. (2008). Childhood victimization: Violence, crime, and abuse in the lives of young people. Oxford University Press.
Finkelhor, D., & Jones, L. (2006). Why have child maltreatment and child victimization declined? Journal of Social Issues, 62(4), 685–716.
Finkelhor, D., Saito, K., & Jones, L. (2020). Updated trends in child maltreatment, 2018. Available at http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV203%20-%20Updated%20trends%202018_ks_df.pdf
Finkelhor, D., Saito, K., & Jones, L. (2021). Updated trends in child maltreatment, 2019. Available at http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV203%20-%20Updated%20trends%202019_ks_df.pdf
Flaherty, E. G., Sege, R., Binns, H. J., Mattson, C. L., & Christoffel, K. K. (2000). Health care providers’ experience reporting child abuse in the primary care setting. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154, 489–493.
Flaherty, E. G., Jones, R., & Sege, R. (2004). Telling their stories; primary care practitioners’ experience evaluating and reporting injuries caused by child abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 28, 939–945.
Flaherty, E. G., Sege, R., Price, L. L., Christoffel, K. K., Norton, D. P., & O’Connor, K. G. (2006). Pediatrician characteristics associated with child abuse identification and reporting: results from a national survey of pediatricians. Child Maltreatment, 11(4), 361–369.
Fluke, J. D., Yuan, Y. T., Hedderson, J., & Curtis, P. A. (2003). Disproportionate representation of race and ethnicity in child maltreatment: Investigation and victimization. Children and Youth Services Review, 25, 359–373.
Fluke, J., Harden, B. J., Jenkins, M., & Reuhrdanz, A. (2011). Disparities and disproportionality in child welfare: Analysis of the research. Available at https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/15376/Casey_Disparities_ChildWelfare.pdf?sequence=5
Fluke, J. Harlaar, N., Heisler, K., Darnell, A., Brown, B., Merkel-Holguin, L. (2016). Differential response and the safety of children reported to child protective services: A tale of six states. United States Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/204981/DifferentialResponse.pdf
Fluke, J. D., Harlaar, N., Brown, B., Heisler, K., Merkel-Holguin, L., & Darnell, A. (2018). Differential response and children re-reported to child protective services: county data from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS). Child Maltreatment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559518816381
Fuller, T., Nieto, M., & Zhang, S. (2013). Differential response in Illinois: Final evaluation report. Children and Family Research Center, School of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. Available at https://cfrc.illinois.edu/pubs/rp_20131001_DifferentialResponseInIllinoisFinalEvaluationReport.pdf
Fuller, T., Braun, M. T., Chiu, Y. L., Cross, T. P., Nieto, M., Tittle, G., & Wakita, S. (2017). Oregon differential response final evaluation report. Children and Family Research Center, University of Illinois, School of Social Work. Available at https://www.cfrc.illinois.edu/pubs/rp_20170630_OregonDifferentialResponseFinalEvaluationReport.pdf
Gallagher-Mackay, K. (2014). Teachers’ duty to report child abuse and neglect and the paradox of noncompliance: Relational theory and “compliance” in the human services. Law and Policy, 36(3), 256–289.
Gerber, L. A., Pang, Y. C., Ross, T., Guggenheim, M., Pecora, P. J., & Miller, J. (2019). Effects of an interdisciplinary approach to parental representation in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 102, 42–55.
Goerge, R. M., & Harden, A. W. (1993). Child welfare services for drug-exposed children. Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
Greene, A.D., McPherson, K., & Sedlak, A.J. (2013). Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4): CPS Screening Policies Study (SPS). OPRE Report. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Greytak, E. (2009). Are teachers prepared? Predictors of teachers’ readiness to serve as mandated reporters of child abuse. University of Pennsylvania. Publicly accessible Penn Dissertations. Paper 57. Available at https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1081&context=edissertations
Guzman, G. G. (2018). Household income: 2017. U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. Available at https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2018/acs/acsbr17-01.pdf
Harris, M. S., & Hackett, W. (2008). Decision points in child welfare: An action research model to address disproportionality. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(2), 199–215.
Hartge, J., Basena, M., Cober, C., Klein, S., & Sedlak, A.J. (2010). Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4) Technical Report II: Data Collection Report. Prepared under contract to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Rockville, MD: Westat, Inc.
Herendeen, P. A., Blevins, R., Anson, B., & Smith, J. A. (2013). Barriers to and consequences of mandated reporting of child abuse by nurse practitioners. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 28(1).
Hughes, R. C., Rycus, J. S., Saunders-Adams, S. M., Hughes, L. K., & Hughes, K. N. (2013). Issues in differential response. Research on Social Work Practice, 00(0), 1–28.
Hymel, K. P., Laskey, A. L., Crowell, K. R., Wang, M., Armijo-Garcia, V., Frazier, T. N., et al. (2018). Racial and ethnic disparities and bias in the evaluation and reporting of abusive head trauma. The Journal of Pediatrics, 198, 137–143.
Ibanez, E. S., Borrego, J., Jr., Pemberton, J. R., & Terao, S. (2006). Cultural factors in decision-making about child physical abuse: Identifying reporter characteristics influencing reporting tendencies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30(12), 1365–1379.
Jaudon, B., & McMahon, J. (2005). Media outreach guide for rural child welfare agencies. University of North Carolina.
Jones, R., Flaherty, E. G., Binns, H. J., Price, L. L., Slora, E., Abney, D., Harris, D. L., Christoffel, K. K., & Sege, R. D. (2008). Clinicians’ description of factors influencing their reporting of suspected child abuse: Report of the child abuse reporting experience study research group. Pediatrics, 122(2), 259–266.
Jonson-Reid, M., Drake, B., Cobetto, C., Gandarilla Ocampo, M. (2020). Child abuse prevention month in the context of COVID-19. Center for Innovation in Child Maltreatment Policy, Research and Training, Washington University in St Louis. Available at https://cicm.wustl.edu/child-abuse-prevention-month-in-the-context-of-covid-19/
Kalichman, S. C. (1993). Mandated reporting of suspected child abuse: ethics, law, and policy. American Psychological Association.
Kempe, C. H., Silverman, F. N., Steele, B. F., Droegemueller, W., & Silver, H. K. (1962). The battered-child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 181(1), 17–24.
Kim, H., Wildeman, C., Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B. (2017). Lifetime prevalence of investigating child maltreatment among US children. American Journal of Public Health, 107(2), 274–280.
Krase, K. S. (2015). Child maltreatment reporting by educational personnel: implications for racial disproportionality in the child welfare system. Children and Schools, 37(2), 89–99.
Lane, W. G., Rubin, D. M., Monteith, R., & Christian, C. W. (2002). Racial differences in the evaluation of pediatric fractures for physical abuse. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(13), 1603–1609.
Lawrence, C., et al. (2011). Multiple response system: Evaluation of policy change in north Carolina’s child welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2344–2365.
Lipton, Z., McAuley, J., & Chouldechova, A. (2018). Does mitigating ML’s impact disparity require treatment disparity?. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 8125–8135). Available at https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/file/8e0384779e58ce2af40eb365b318cc32-Paper.pdf
Loman, A. & Siegel, G. (2004). Minnesota alternative response evaluation: Final report. St. Louis, MO. Available at http://www.iarstl.org/papers/ARFinalEvaluationReport.pdf
Loman, A., & Siegel, G. (2012). Effects of anti-poverty services under the differential response approach to child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9), 1659–1666.
Loman, L. A., & Siegel, G. L. (2015). Effects of approach and services under differential response on long term child safety and welfare. Child Abuse and Neglect, 39, 86–97.
Loman, A., Filonow, C.S., & Siegel, G. (2010a). Institute of applied research: Ohio alternative response evaluation: Final report. St. Louis, MO. Available at http://www.iarstl.org/papers/OhioAREvaluation.pdf
Loman, A. Filonow, C.S., & Siegel, G. (2010b). Institute of applied research: Differential response in nevada final evaluation report. St. Louis, MO. Available at http://www.iarstl.org/papers/NevadaDRFinalReport.pdf
Mantler, T., Jackson, K. T., & Ford-Gilboe, M. (2018). The CENTRAL Hub Model: Strategies and innovations used by rural women’s shelters in Canada to strengthen service delivery and support women. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 13(3).
McPherson, K., & Sedlak, A.J. (2013). Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4): Sentinel Definitions Survey (SDS). OPRE Report. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
McTavish, J. R., Kimber, M., Devries, K., Colombini, M., MacGregor, J. C., Wathen, C. N., Agarwal, A., & MacMillan, H. L. (2017). Mandated reporters’ experiences with reporting child maltreatment: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ Open, 7(10), e013942.
Melton, G. B. (2005). Mandated reporting: A policy without reason. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 9–18.
Morgan, R.E. and Oudekerk, B.A. 2019. Criminal victimization, 2018.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available at https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf. Data tables available at https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=6686
Murphy, J., Newton-Curtis, L., Kimmich, M. (2013). Ohio SOAR Project: Final Report. Prepared for the National Quality Improvement Center on Differential Response in Child Protective Services and the Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse & Neglect. Available at https://www.hsri.org/publication/ohio-soar-project-final-report
National Child Traumatic Stress Network Child Welfare Committee and Chapin Hall. (2020). Recommendations for Trauma-Informed Care Under the Family First Prevention Services Act. Los Angeles, CA and Durham, NC and Chicago, IL: National Center for Child Traumatic Stress and Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago. Available at https://www.nctsn.org/sites/default/files/resources/special-resource/recommendations_for_trauma_informed_care_under_the_family_first_prevention_services_act.pdf
National Quality Improvement Center on Differential Response in Child Protective Services. (2011). Differential response in child protective services: A literature review, version 2. Kempe Center, University of Colorado.
Nelson, B. J. (1984). Making an issue of child abuse: Political agenda setting for social problems. University of Chicago Press. https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrvv/1/3/215.full.pdf
Neuspiel, D. R., Zingman, T. M., Templeton, V. H., DiStabile, P., & Drucker, E. (1993). Custody of cocaine-exposed newborns: determinants of discharge decisions. American Journal of Public Health, 83(12), 1726–1729.
O’Toole, R., & Webster, S. W. (1999). Teachers’ recognition and reporting of child abuse: A factorial survey. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23(11), 1083–1101.
Ortiz, M., Shusterman, G., & Fluke, J. (2008). Outcomes for children with allegations of neglect who receive alternative response and traditional investigations: Findings from NCANDS. Protecting Children, 23(1/2), 57–70.
Pelton, L. H. (2015). The continuing role of material factors in child maltreatment and placement. Child Abuse and Neglect, 41, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.001
Piper, K. (2016). Differential Response in child protection services: A comparison of implementation and child safety outcomes. Dissertation submitted to Brandeis University. ProQuest Dissertations. http://search.proquest.com/openview/310c90d6ad25fac09786a2eeb6a4f4ee/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Piper, K. (2017). Differential response in child protection: How much is too much? Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 69–80.
Purdy, J., Glass, B., & Pakseresht, F. (2018). Fairness in machine-learning-generated risk scores via equitable thresholding. Oregon Department of Human Services, Office of Reporting, Research, Analytics and Implementation. Available at https://www.oregon.gov/DHS/ORRAI/Documents/Fairness-Machine-Learning-Generated-Risk-Scores-Equitable-Thresholding.pdf
Putnam-Hornstein, E., Needell, B., King, B., & Johnson-Motoyama, M. (2013). Racial and ethnic disparities: A population-based examination of risk factors for involvement with child protective services. Child Abuse and Neglect, 37, 33–46.
Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network. (2020, July 06). As virus restrictions eased, sexual assault survivors accessed help in record numbers. Available at https://www.rainn.org/news/virus-restrictions-eased-sexual-assault-survivors-accessed-help-record-numbers
Ruppel, J., Huang, Y., & Haulenbeek, G. (2011). Differential response in child protective services in New York State: Implementation, initial outcomes, and impacts of pilot project. A report to the governor and legislature. Available at https://docplayer.net/15439397-Differential-response-in-child-protective-services-in-new-york-state.html
Samuels, B. (2020). Family and child well-being: An urgent call to action. Children’s Bureau Express, 21(6), 1–3. Available at https://cbexpress.acf.hhs.gov/index.cfm?event=website.viewArticles&issueid=218§ionid=2&articleid=602
Schene, P. A. (1998). Past, present and future roles of child protective services. The Future of Children, 8(1), 23–27.
Schmidt, S., & Natanson, H. (2020). With kids stuck at home, ER doctors see more severe cases of child abuse. Washington Post. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/04/30/child-abuse-reports-coronavirus/
Schultz, L. G. (1990). Confidentiality, privilege, and child abuse reporting. Issues in child abuse accusations, 2(4). Northfield, MN: Institute for Psychological Therapies. Available at http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume2/j2_4_5.htm
Sedlak, A. J. (2021). Special tabulation of NIS-4 data for this chapter. Personal communication.
Sedlak, A.J., Mettenburg, J., Schultz, D., & Cook, D. (2003). Planning for NIS-4. Task 9B—Enhancement Option 2: NIS Definitions Review. Report under contract No. 282-98-0015, Delivery Order No. 40 for the Children’s Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Rockville, MD: Westat.
Sedlak, A. J., McPherson, K., & Das, B. (2010). Supplementary analyses of race differences in child maltreatment rates in the NIS-4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.
Sedlak, A. J., Mettenburg, J., Basena, M., Petta, I., McPherson, K., Greene, A., & Li, S. (2010a). Fourth National incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS–4): Report to congress. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. Available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/research/project/national-incidence-study-of-child-abuse-and-neglect-nis-4-2004-2009
Sedlak, A.J., Gragg, F., Mettenburg, J., Ciarico, J., Winglee, M., Shapiro, G., Hartge, J., Li, S., Greene, A., & McPherson, K. (2010b). Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4) Technical Report I: Design and Methods Summary. Prepared under contract to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Rockville, MD: Westat,Inc.
Sedlak, A. J., Mettenburg, J., Winglee, M., Ciarico, J., & Basena, M., with Rust, K., Shapiro, G., Goksel, H., Hartge, J., Park, I., & Clark, J. (2010c). Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-4) Technical Report III: Analysis Report. Prepared under contract to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (pp. 4–36). Rockville, MD: Westat, Inc.
Sedlak, A.J., McPherson, K., Shusterman, G., & Li, S. (2013). Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4): CPS Structure and Practices Mail Survey (SPM). OPRE Report. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Semanchin Jones, A. M. (2013). From investigating to engaging families: Examining the impact and implementation of family assessment response on racial equity in child welfare. Available at https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/159197
Shipe, S. (2017). Alternative response in child welfare: A mixed methods study of caseworker decision making. University of Maryland, Baltimore. PhD Dissertation. Available at https://archive.hshsl.umaryland.edu/handle/10713/6718
Shusterman, G.R., Hollinshead, D., Fluke, J.D., & Yuan, Y.T. (2005). Alternative responses to child maltreatment: Findings from NCANDS. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Available at https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/74256/report.pdf
Siegel, G. L., & Loman, L. A. (1997). Missouri family assessment and response demonstration: Final evaluation report. Institute of Applied Research. Available at http://www.iarstl.org/papers/MO%20FAR%20Final%20Report-for%20website.pdf
Smith, S. G., Zhang, X., Basile, K. C., Merrick, M. T., Wang, J., Kresnow, M., & Chen, J. (2018). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2015 Data Brief – Updated Release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf
Swartz, D. D. (1995). Teachers’ awareness of and willingness to report suspected child abuse. Unpublished Dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=5600434
Tilden, V. P., Schmidt, T. A., Limandri, B. J., Chiodo, G. T., Garland, M. J., & Loveless, P. A. (1994). Factors that influence clinicians’ assessment and management of family violence. American Journal of Public Health, 84(4), 628–633.
Traish, N. M. (2019). Evaluating the differential response approach in child protection: A systematic review of the evidence. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Texas at Austin. Available at https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/78602/TRAISH-MASTERSREPORT-2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2020). Child Maltreatment 2018. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2021). Child Maltreatment 2019. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2006). Child Maltreatment 2004. Available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2010a). Child Maltreatment 2008. Available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2010b). Child Maltreatment 2009. Available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2011). Child Maltreatment 2010. Available from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2012). Child Maltreatment 2011. Available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. (2017). Child Maltreatment 2015. Available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families. (2002). Child Maltreatment 2000. Available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment
Wald, M. S. (2021). Beyond CPS: Building a system to protect the safety and basic development of children experiencing problematic parenting. [add handbook info TBD].
Weiner, D., Heaton, L., Stiehl, M., Chor, B., Kim, K., Heisler, K., Foltz, R., & Farrell, A. (2020). Chapin Hall issue brief: COVID-19 and child welfare: Using data to understand trends in maltreatment and response. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago. https://www.chapinhall.org/research/covid-19-and-child-welfare/
Winokur, M., Ellis, R., Drury, I., & Rogers, J. (2015). Answering the big questions about differential response in Colorado: Safety and cost outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Child Abuse & Neglect, 39, 98–108.
Zellman, G. (1990). Child abuse reporting and failure to report among mandated reporters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5(1), 3–22.
Zellman, G. L. (1992). The impact of case characteristics on child abuse reporting decisions. Child Abuse and Neglect, 14(3), 325–336.
Acknowledgements
Raquel Ellis was co-author on this chapter in the previous edition of this Handbook. The current authors acknowledge her contributions to the text in several sections that we have retained here. We are thankful as well to our colleagues who read, discussed, and critiqued drafts of the chapter in that earlier edition: George Gabel, Ronna Cook, and David Finkelhor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sedlak, A.J., Heaton, L., Evans, M. (2022). Trends in Child Abuse Reporting. In: Krugman, R.D., Korbin, J.E. (eds) Handbook of Child Maltreatment. Child Maltreatment, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82479-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82479-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82478-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82479-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)