Skip to main content

Introduction to Computational Design: Subsets, Challenges in Practice and Emerging Roles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Industry 4.0 for the Built Environment

Part of the book series: Structural Integrity ((STIN,volume 20))

Abstract

Computation-based approaches have been flourishing in the construction industry for the past years. From experimental practices to mainstream production, the usage of digital tools tends to be diverse and versatile. This is especially true for computational design (CD) which encompasses multiple practices, transforming the future of the industry and its stakeholders. Through the ever-increasing speed and capacity of computers, computation enables dealing with geometries and tasks which were traditionally either too time consuming or too challenging to be accomplished by human alone. However, CD is not just automating existing traditional processes or tedious tasks; it is about shifting the way we think and design. To better understand how to unlock the opportunities of CD, this chapter discusses the following: 1—the main subsets of CD, called parametric, generative and algorithmic design; 2—presents CD’s different toolsets and their evolutions and finally 3—interrogates how CD is integrated in practice, with its emerging roles and skillsets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Architecture Engineering Construction and Operation.

  2. 2.

    CAD: Computer-aided design systems such as AutoCAD (Autodesk) or Microstation (Bentley Systems).

  3. 3.

    To be more specific, Menges and Alquist define an algorithm as “a finite sequence of explicit, elementary instructions described in an exact, complete yet general manner” [2, p. 13].

  4. 4.

    About the difference between explore or search: “Search is a process for locating values of variables in a defined state space while exploration is a process for producing state spaces” [27].

  5. 5.

    EZCT Architecture and Design Research (with Hatem Hamda and Marc Schoenauer) Studies on Optimization: Computational chair design using genetic algorithms, 2004, Chair Model “T1-M” after 860 generations (86,000 structural evaluations).

  6. 6.

    See Chapter “Building Information Modelling and Information Management”.

References

  1. Picon, A.: Digital culture in architecture: an introduction for the design professions. Birkhauser Architecture (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Menges, A., Ahlquist, S.: Computational Design Thinking. Wiley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Negroponte, N.: Towards a humanism through Machines. In: Menges, A., Ahlquist, S. (eds.) Computational Design Thinking. AD Readers (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denning, P.J., Tedre, M.: Computational Thinking. MIT Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein, P.G.: Architecture, design, data : practice competency in the era of computation. In: Birkhauser Architecture (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carpo, M.: The second digital turn: design beyond intelligence. MIT Press (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Terzidis, K.: Algorithmic design: a paradigm shift in architecture? In: Proceedings of the 22nd eCAADe Conference, pp. 201–207 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Terzidis, K.: Algorithmic Architecture. Architectural Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Susskind, R.E., Susskind, D.: The future of the professions: how technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford University Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deutsch, R.: Superusers: design technology specialists and the future of practice. Routledge (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shelden, D.: The disruptors: technology-driven architect-entrepreneurs. Wiley (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Caetano, I., Santos, L., Leitão, A.: Computational design in architecture: defining parametric, generative, and algorithmic design. Front. Architec. Res. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, D.: The future of architectural discourse. https://www.danieldavis.com/, https://www.danieldavis.com/the-future-of-architectural-discourse/ (2013). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  14. Aish, R., Woodbury, R.: Multi-level interaction in parametric design. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3638, 151–162 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Janssen, P., Stouffs, R.: Types of parametric modelling. In: CAADRIA 2015—Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, Emerging Experience in Past, Present and Future of Digital Architecture, pp. 157–166 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Woodbury, R.: Elements of parametric design. Routledge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schumacher, P.: Parametricism: a new global style for architecture and urban design. Archit. Des. 79, 14–23 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burger, S.: Natural and intuitive. http://shaneburger.com/2011/08/designing-design/ (2011). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  19. Carlos, C., Richard, N.: Beyond modelling: avant-garde computer techniques in residential buildings. Jornadas Investig. en Constr. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kolarevic, B.: Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing. Spon Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Menges, A.: Integral formation and materialisation, Computational form and material gestalt. In: Computational Design Thinking. Wiley (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Migayrou, F.: Architecture non standard. Centre Pompidou ed (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krüger, S., Borsato, M.: Developing knowledge on digital manufacturing to digital twin: a bibliometric and systemic analysis. Procedia Manuf. 38, 1174–1180 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garber, R.: Workflows: Expanding architecture’s territory in the design and delivery of building. Wiley (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peters, B., De Kestelier, X.: Computation works: the building of algorithmic thought. Wiley (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thomsen, M. R., Tamke, M.: Design transactions. UCL Press (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson, C., Bailey, C., Heumann, A., Davis, D.: Augmented space planning: using procedural generation to automate desk layouts. Int. J. Archit. Comput. 16, 164–177 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pottman, H., Asperl, A., Hofer, M., Kilian, A., Bentley, D.: Architectural geometry. Bentley Institute Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Burry, J., Burry, M.: The new mathematics of architecture. Thames & Hudson (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leach, N.: Digital Cities. Wiley (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. DeLanda, M.: The limits of urban simulation. In: Digital Cities. Wiley (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morel, P., Agid, F., Feringa, J.: Studies on optimization : computational chair design using genetic algorithms. http://transnatural.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/EZCT_Booklet-Screen.pdf (2004). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  33. SpaceMakerAI.: Early stage planning. Re-imagined. https://www.spacemakerai.com/ (2020). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  34. ArchiStar.: ArchiStar property insights. https://archistar.ai/ (2020). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  35. TestFit.: TestFit: the world’s most powerful building configurator. https://testfit.io/ (2020). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  36. Terzidis, K.: Algorithmic form. In: Computational Design Thinking (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  37. GenerativeComponents.: An overview of GenerativeComponents. https://communities.bentley.com/products/products_generativecomponents/w/generative_components_community_wiki (2003). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  38. Grasshopper.: Grasshopper, algorithmic modeling for Rhino. https://www.grasshopper3d.com/ (2007). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  39. DynamoBIM.: Open source graphical programming for design. https://dynamobim.org/learn/ (2016). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  40. XGenerativeDesign.: Generative design engineering. https://ifwe.3ds.com/media/generative-design-engineering (2018). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  41. Davis, D.: Modelled on software engineering: flexible parametric models in the practice of architecture. RMIT University (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Aish, R., Bredella, N.: The evolution of architectural computing: from building modelling to design computation. arq Archit. Res. Q. 21, 65–73 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Berg, N.: NBBJ releases human UI to bring parametric modeling to the masses. Architect, Journal of the American Institute of Architects (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Heumann, A.: Human UI. Github https://github.com/andrewheumann/humanui (2016). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  45. Hypar.: Hypar live. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAFXAcwXNDU (2020). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  46. Davis, D.: Design ecosystems: customising the architectural design environment with software plug-ins. https://www.danieldavis.com/design-ecosystems-customising-the-architectural-design-environment-with-software-plug-ins/ (2013). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  47. Fok, W., Picon, A.: Digital property: open-source architecture. Wiley (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Speckle.: Introduction to Speckle. https://github.com/speckleworks (2020). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  49. Stefanescu, D.: Alternative means of digital design communication. In: Sheil, B., Thomsen, M.R., Tamke, M., Hanna, S. (eds.) Design Transactions. UCL Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Blender Foundation.: Blender.org. https://www.blender.org/foundation/ (2002). Last accessed 2021/01/31

  51. Davis, D.: Architects versus autodesk. The magazine of the American Institute of Architects (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Collective. An open letter that reflects customer perspectives on Autodesk in 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Succar, B., Kassem, M.: Macro BIM adoption: conceptual structures. Autom. Constr. 57, 64–79 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hochscheid, E., Halin, G.: A framework for studying the factors that influence the BIM adoption process. In: 36th CIB W78 2019 Conference ICT in Design, Construction and Management in Architecture, Engineering, Construction and Operations, pp. 275–285 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ahmed, A.L., Kawalek, J.P., Kassem, M.: A comprehensive identification and categorisation of drivers, factors, and determinants for BIM adoption: a systematic literature review. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2017, 220–227 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  56. de Boissieu, A.: Super-utilisateurs ou super-spécialistes ? Cartographie des catalyseurs de la transformation numérique en agence d’architecture. Les Cahiers de la Recherche Architecturale urbaine et paysagère 10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  57. de Boissieu, A.: Modélisation paramétrique en conception architecturale: caractérisation des opérations cognitives de conception pour une pédagogie. Universite Paris-Est (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Davies, K., McMeel, D., Wilkinson, S.: Soft skills requirements in a BIM project team. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference of CIB W78 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  59. McAfee, A., Kestenbaum, D.: Experts debate: will computers edge people out of entire careers?. NPR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Davis, D.: Why architects can’t be automated. Architect Magazine (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Chadoin, O.: Etre architecte, les vertus de l’indétermination. Presses Universitaire Limoges (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Miller, N., Stasiuk, D.: Negotiating structured building information data. In: Sheil, B., Thomsen, M.R., Tamke, M., Hanna, S. (eds.) Design Transactions. UCL Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Anderson, C.: Creating a Data-Driven Organization. O’Reilly (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Poinet, P.: Enhancing collaborative practices in architecture, engineering and construction through multi-scalar modelling methodologies. Aarhus School of Architecture (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Miller, N.: [make]SHIFT: Information exchange and collaborative design workflows. In: ACADIA, pp. 139–144 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Fano, D., Davis, D.: New models of building: the business of technology. In: Shelden, D. (ed.) The Disruptors. Wiley (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Boeykens, S.: Bridging building information modeling and parametric design. In: eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction—Proceedings of European Conference on Product and Process Modelling, ECPPM 2012, pp. 453–458 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurelie de Boissieu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Boissieu, A. (2022). Introduction to Computational Design: Subsets, Challenges in Practice and Emerging Roles. In: Bolpagni, M., Gavina, R., Ribeiro, D. (eds) Industry 4.0 for the Built Environment. Structural Integrity, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82430-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82430-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82429-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82430-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics