Skip to main content

Affective Story-Morphing: Manipulating Shelley’s Frankenstein under Program Control using Emotionally Intelligent Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 294))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a theoretical model for the automated generation of plot-consistent, novel, engaging narratives based on a broad, computable model of emotion. We review the background theory, relevant to the morphing of narratives, composed of 28 emotion categories, 24 emotion intensity variables, and ~400 channels for emotion expression, which has been implemented in an AI program called the Affective Reasoner. We argue that what is primarily of interest in narratives is the emotion fabric present in the interaction between characters—much of which can be manipulated by the Affective Reasoner—and that while keeping the plot the same or similar we can, under computational control, create novel, interesting, consistent new stories that make sense to human observers. We present and explain preliminary examples and then apply the story-morphing techniques to a passage from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With a tip of the hat to Pylyshyn’s cognitively impenetrable early vision module (Pylyshyn 1999).

  2. 2.

    Based on unpublished work of Ortony, Elliott and Gilboa.

References

  • Bruner, J.: Culture and human development: a new look. Hum. Dev. 33(6), 344–355 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.S.: On perceptual readiness. Psychol. Rev. 64, 123 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C.: Felt emotion. In: Emotion and Sentiment in Social and Expressive Media @AAMAS, pp. 67–76 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Carolis, B.N., Ferilli, S., Palestra, G., Carofiglio, V.: Towards an empathic social robot for ambient assisted living. In: Emotion and Sentiment in Social and Expressive Media @AAMAS, pp. 19–34 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Keersmaecker, J., et al.: Investigating the robustness of the illusory truth effect across individual differences in cognitive ability, need for cognitive closure, and cognitive style. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46, 204–215 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Oster, H.: Facial expressions of emotion. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 30(1), 527–554 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C.: The affective reasoner: a process model of emotions in a multi-agent system, Technical report #32. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, The Institute for the Learning Sciences (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C.: I picked up catapia and other stories: a multimodal approach to expressivity for emotionally intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 451–457 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C.: Why boys like motorcycles: using emotion theory to find structure in humorous stories. Unpublished paper, School of Computer Science, DePaul University, Chicago (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C., Ortony, A.: Point of view: modeling the emotions of others. In: Proceedings 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 809–814 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C., Siegle, G.: Variables influencing the intensity of simulated affective states. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on Reasoning about Mental States: Formal Theories and Applications, pp. 58–67 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C., Brzezinski, J., Sheth, S., Salvatoriello, R.: Story-morphing in the affective reasoning paradigm: generating stories semi-automatically for use with __emotionally intelligent__ multimedia agents. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 181–188 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C., Rickel, J., Lester, J.: Lifelike pedagogical agents and affective computing: an exploratory synthesis. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Veloso, M. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Today. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1600, pp. 195–211. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48317-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A.: The Language of Thought, vol. 5. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R.M., Bourke, F.: Remediation of intrusive symptoms of PTSD in fewer than five sessions: a 30-person pre-pilot study of the RTM Protocol. J. Milit. Veteran Family Health 1, 13–20 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E., Padó, S., Klinger, R.: Investigating the relationship between literary genres and emotional plot development. In: Proceedings of the Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature, pp. 17–26 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: The contemporary theory of metaphor (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • MasterClass: Complete Guide to Literary Themes: Definition, Examples, and How to Create Literary Themes in Your Writing, 15 February 2021. From MasterClass: https://www.masterclass.com/articles/the-complete-guide-to-narrative-theme-in-literature-definition-examples-and-writing-how-to#what-is-a-literary-theme. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

  • McClelland, J.L., McNaughton, B.L., O’Reilly, R.C.: Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol. Rev. 102, 419 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z.: Is vision continuous with cognition?: the case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 341–365 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagan, A.J.: Towards a science of human stories: using sentiment analysis and emotional arcs to understand the building blocks of complex social systems (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, M.: The Language of Thought Hypothesis (E.N. Zalta ed.) (2019). From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/language-thought/. Accessed 14 Apr 2021

  • Shank, R.C.: Tell Me a Story: Narrative and Intelligence. Northwestern University Press, Evanston (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, M.W.: Frankenstein, Or, The Modern Prometheus: The 1818 Text. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia: Love of Chair, 15 February 2021. From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_of_Chair. Accessed 15 Feb 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clark Elliott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Elliott, C. (2022). Affective Story-Morphing: Manipulating Shelley’s Frankenstein under Program Control using Emotionally Intelligent Agents. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 294. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82193-7_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics