Skip to main content

Ridicule and Humour in the Global South: Theorizing Politics of Laughter in the Social Media Age

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Laughter in the Social Media Age

Abstract

This chapter lays a theoretical foundation for this book. The Politics of Laughter in the Social Media Age: Perspectives from the Global South focuses on the politics of ridicule, humour and laughter in the Global South. There are many different contexts in the Global South where humour has been used by ordinary citizens targeted at exposing the follies of those in power and the consequences have been devastating. Ridicule and humour, while making people laugh and at times grasp their conditions of existence or even pushing them to make alterations, has been one of the accessible ways for coping or bringing about change in society. Focus on the Global South is brought about by an appetite to explore humour and its uses in some unique and yet complex systems of governance, social configurations and political communication. Thus, Global South scholars should be given a chance to tap from the intellectual traditions and cultures of their region and bring forth understandings and analyses of people’s lived experiences. This chapter contends that digital media could be powerful platforms for the marginalised, spaces to share humourous moments about life and politics or could weapons of the weak in complex relationships between politics, politicians, challenges and citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alimonti, V. (2019). Protests and Technology in Latin America: 2019 in Review. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/12/protests-and-technology-latin-america-2019-review-0

  • Anesi, J. (2018). Laughing matters: Humour as advocacy in education for the disabled. Disability & Society, 33(5), 723–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arango, E. A. (2013). Racismo y discurso en la era digital: el caso de la revista Hola y los discursos en las redes sociales. Discurso & Sociedad, 7(4), 617–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardon, A. (2005). The philosophy of humor. In M. Charney (Ed.), Comedy: A geographic and historical guide, 2 vols (pp. 462–476). Westport CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1991). A sociological theory of postmodernity. Thesis Eleven, 29(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, J. (1779). Essay on Laughter and Ludicrous Composition. In Essays (3rd ed.). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (2001). Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, T. (2012). Critical comedy: Satire, absurdity and Ireland’s economic crash. Irish Political Studies, 27(3), 440–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142).Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chukwumah, I. (Ed.). (2018). Joke-performance in Africa: Mode, media and meaning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, O., & Cilliers, F. (2012). Humour as defence against the anxiety manifesting in diversity experiences. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA Tydskrif vir Bedryfsielkunde, 38(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v38i2.990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dados, N., & Connell, R. W. (2012). The global South. Contexts, 11(1), 12–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downe, P. (1999). Laughing when it hurts: Humor and violence in the lives of costa Rican prostitutes. Women’s Studies International Forum, 22(1), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynel, M., & Poppi, F. I. M. (2020): Caveat emptor: boycott through digital humour on the wave of the 2019 Hong Kong protests, Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1757134

  • Elias, N. (1978). The civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1883). The appreciation of humour: An experimental and theoretical study. British Journal of Psychology, 32(4), 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, B. (2020). Racism Is Alive and Well in China https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/racism-is-alive-and-well-in-china/

  • Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter interaction. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. D. (2003). Laughter out of place: Race, class, violence, and sexuality in a Rio shantytown. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamamoto, D. (1989). Nervous laughter: Television situation comedy and liberal democratic ideology: New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, T., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2019). Cultural Differences in Humor Perception, Usage, and Implications. Front. Psychol. 10(123), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123

  • Kant, I. (1952). Critique of Judgement, Trans. Janies Meredith Creed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Arkana/Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozintsev, A. (2010). The mirror of laughter. Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, G., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2010). The use of social media in disaster situations: Framework and cases. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 2(1), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintott, S. (2016). Superiority in humor theory. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 74(4), 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer, N. (2010). Dynamics of social class contempt in contemporary British television comedy. Social Semiotics, 20(2), 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luqiu, L. R. (2017). The cost of humour: Political satire on social media and censorship in China. Global Media and Communication, 13(2), 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (1982). A new theory of laughter. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 42(2), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (1983). Taking laughter seriously. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (2008). Philosophy and religion. In V. Raskin (Ed.), The primer of humour research. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (2012). Humor, philosophy and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(2), 120–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morreall, J. (2013). Philosophy of Humor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/humor/.

  • Mulkay, M. (1988). On humour: Its nature and its place in modern society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obadare, E. (2012). State of travesty: Jokes and the logic of socio-cultural improvisation in Africa. Critical African Studies, 2(4), 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obadare, E. (2016). Humour, silence and civil society in Nigeria. University of Rochester Press: Boydell & Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. (1994). Taking humour seriously. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1993). Philebus. Translated by Dorothea Frede. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145, 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prynne, W. 1633. Histrio-Mastix: The players scourge or actors Traegedie. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, I. (1987). Risus Monasticus: Laughter and medieval monastic culture. Revue Benedictine, 97(1–2), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodenburg, J. N. B. (1997). A cultural history of humour. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshani, N. (2016). Grassroots Perspectives on Hate Speech, Race, & Inequality in Brazil & Colombia. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaff, P. (Ed.). (1889). John Chrysostom, on the priesthood: Ascetic treatises; select homilies and letters; homilies on the statues, vol. 9 of a select library of the Nicene and post-Nicene fathers of the Christian Church. Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifman, L., Coleman, S., & Ward, S. (2007). Only joking? Online humour in the 2005 UK general election. Information, Communication & Society, 10(4), 465–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharoor, I. (2016). China and India have a huge problem with racism toward black people. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/05/27/china-and-india-have-a-huge-problem-with-racism-toward-black-people/

  • Trindade, L. V. P. (2018). It is not that Funny. Critical Analysis of Racial Ideologies Embedded in Racialized Humour Discourses on Social Media in Brazil. PhD Thesis, University of Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trindade, L. V. P. (2020). Disparagement humour and gendered racism on social media in Brazil. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(15), 2766–2784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S. (2011a). Jokes, rhetoric and embodied racism: A rhetorical discourse analysis of the logics of racist jokes on the internet. Ethnicities, 11(4), 413–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S. (2011b). The rhetoric of racist humour: US, UK and global race joking. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, S. (2013). A rhetorical discourse analysis of online anti-Muslim and anti- Semitic jokes. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(3), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfers, S., File, K., & Schnurr, S. (2017). ‘Just because He’s black’: Identity construction and racial humour in a German U-19 football team. Journal of Pragmatics, 112, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mpofu, S. (2021). Ridicule and Humour in the Global South: Theorizing Politics of Laughter in the Social Media Age. In: Mpofu, S. (eds) The Politics of Laughter in the Social Media Age. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81969-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics