Skip to main content

The Socio-technical Foundations of Health Information Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Health Information Workforce

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Abstract

Socio-technical values, principles, and theories are foundational knowledge for health information professionals. These emphasise that people who work with technology are augmented by it, not subordinate to it. Applying them can contribute to more effective design, development, implementation, management, and use of digital health and information systems. This chapter briefly describes the origins and underlying values of the socio-technical approach. It then discusses theories and key concepts. The second section demonstrates the relevance of socio-technical design to the health services in general and health information professionals, in particular. Examples from research and case studies are used to demonstrate how this workforce can apply socio-technical values and principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adaba GB, Kebebew Y. Improving a health information system for real-time data entries: an action research project using socio-technical systems theory. Inform Health Social Care. 2018;43(2):159–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal R, Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decis Sci. 1997;28(3):557–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad MI. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a decade of validation and development. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on ICT in our Lives (ISSN 2314–8942). Egypt: Alexandria University; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Digital Health Agency. Australia’s National Digital Health strategy: safe, seamless and secure: evolving health and care to meet the needs of modern Australia. Australian Government and Australian Digital Health Agency: Sydney; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayaz A, Yanartaş M. An analysis on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology theory (UTAUT): acceptance of electronic document management system (EDMS). Comput Human Behav Rep. 2020;2:100032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzopardi-Muscat N, Sørensen K. Towards an equitable digital public health era: promoting equity through a health literacy perspective. Eur J Public Health. 2019;29(Suppl 3):13–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baker KM, Magee MF, Smith KM. Understanding nursing workflow for inpatient education delivery: time and motion study. JMIR Nurs. 2019;2(1):e15658.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter G, Sommerville I. Socio-technical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interact Comput. 2011;23(1):4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borycki E, Kushniruk A. Towards an integrative cognitive-socio-technical approach in health informatics: analyzing technology-induced error involving health information systems to improve patient safety. Open Med Inform J. 2010;4:181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Callon M. The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A, editors. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Springer; 1986. p. 19–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Actor-network theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Medical Inform Decis Making. 2010;10(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano MA, Selby RW. How Microsoft builds software. Commun ACM. 1997;40(6):53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deluca JM, Enmark R. E-health: the changing model of healthcare. Front Health Serv Manag. 2000;17(1):3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll CAH, Gurmu S, Azeem A, El Metwally D. Implementation of smart phones to facilitate in-hospital telephone communication: challenges, successes and lessons from a neonatal intensive care unit. Healthcare; 2019:100331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckvale K, Wang CJ, Majeed A, Car J. Digital health at fifteen: more human (more needed). BMC Med. 2019;17(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes HP, Clegg CW, Bolton LE, Machon LC. Systems scenarios: a tool for facilitating the socio-technical design of work systems. Ergonomics. 2017;60(10):1319–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen S. Use of clinical simulation in development of clinical systems. Department of Planning and Development. Denmark: Aalborg University; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen S. Patient safety and quality of care: how may clinical simulation contribute? Knowl Manag E-Learn. 2015;7(3):412–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen S, Kushniruk A. Boundary objects in clinical simulation and design of eHealth. Health Inform J. 2016;22(2):248–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz D, Kahn RL. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Auflage Wiley; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy S, Yaldren J. A look at digital literacy in health and social care. Br J Cardiac Nurs. 2017;12(9):428–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Lee K-H, Hwang H, Yoo S. Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals’ adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital. BMC Medical Inform Decis Making. 2015;16(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land F, Mumford E, Hawgood J. Training the systems analyst for the 1980s: four new design tools to assist the design process. The Information Systems Environment. North Holland; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KR. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2003;12(1):752–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch S, Warren MJ. ETHICS: the past, present and future of socio-technical systems design. IFIP International Conference on the History of Computing. 2010:189–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi PM. Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Inf Organ. 2013;23(2):59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod A, Cameron P, Ajjawi R, Kits O, Tummons J. Actor-network theory and ethnography: sociomaterial approaches to researching medical education. Perspect Medical Educ. 2019;8(3):177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather C. Case Study: An interdisciplinary evaluation of an e-portfolio: WIL at the University of Tasmania Workready: E-portfolios to support professional placements in Nursing and Construction Management degrees in Australia. Print National: NSW; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather C, Cummings E. Modelling digital knowledge transfer: nurse supervisors transforming learning at point of care to advance nursing practice. Informatics; 2017:12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather CA, Cummings E. Developing and sustaining digital professionalism: a model for assessing readiness of healthcare environments and capability of nurses. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019;26(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather C, Jensen S, Cummings E. Clinical simulation: a protocol for evaluation of mobile technology. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017a;241:179–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mather CA, Gale F, Cummings EA. Governing mobile technology use for continuing professional development in the Australian nursing profession. BMC Nurs. 2017b;16(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E. The story of socio-technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential. Inf Syst J. 2006;16(4):317–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Baroudi JJ. Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Inf Syst Res. 1991;2(1):1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV. Digital work: a research agenda. A research agenda for management and organization studies. Edward Elgar; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahay S. Implementation of information technology: a time-space perspective. Organ Stud. 1997;18(2):229–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer S, Jarrahi M. Computing handbook: information systems and information technology. Florida: CRC Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showell C, Cummings E, Turner P. The invisibility of disadvantage: why do we not notice? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;235:388–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sittig DF, Singh H. Defining health information technology–related errors: new developments since to err is human. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(14):1281–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen OJ, Heggen K, Strand R. Applying principles of sociotechnical systems onto working environment research. 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003:425–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Zhang X, Sykes TA. “Doctors do too little technology”: a longitudinal field study of an electronic healthcare system implementation. Inf Syst Res. 2011;22(3):523–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Bala H. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q. 2013:21–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy L. An outline of general system theory. Br J Philos Sci. 1950;1:134–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter SR, Dunsmuir WT, Raban MZ, Westbrook JI. Understanding clinical workflow through direct continuous observation: addressing the unique statistical challenges. Cogn Inform. 2019:191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook JI, Duffield C, Li L, Creswick NJ. How much time do nurses have for patients? A longitudinal study quantifying hospital nurses’ patterns of task time distribution and interactions with health professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Whetton S. Health informatics: a socio-technical perspective. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurtseven MK, Buchanan WW. Socio-technical system design: a general systems theory perspective. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education-ICECE’2013; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carey A. Mather .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mather, C.A., Whetton, S. (2021). The Socio-technical Foundations of Health Information Work. In: Butler-Henderson, K., Day, K., Gray, K. (eds) The Health Information Workforce . Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81850-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81850-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81849-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81850-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics