Skip to main content

On Explicit and Implicit Procedures to Mitigate Environmental and Operational Variabilities in Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Structural Health Monitoring Based on Data Science Techniques

Part of the book series: Structural Integrity ((STIN,volume 21))

Abstract

Vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring (VSHM) is becoming one of the most commonly used methods for damage diagnosis and long term monitoring. In data-driven VSHM methods, Damage Sensitive Features (DSFs) extracted from vibration responses are compared with reference models of the healthy state for long-term monitoring and damage identification of the structure of interest. However, data-driven VSHM faces a crucial problem - the DSFs are not only sensitive to damage but also to Environmental and Operational Variabilities (EOV). Machine learning and related methods, enabled by the availability of large monitoring datasets, can be used for mitigation of EOV in DSFs. EOV mitigation methods can be grouped into implicit and explicit methods. In the former, EOVs are compensated solely on the basis of the patterns identified in DSFs in the reference state. While the latter utilize measurements of the EOVs in addition to DSFs to build a cause-effect model, typically in the form of a regression. In this chapter, these two methods are discussed and illustrated via two different approaches: an artificial neural network for metric learning (implicit) and a multivariate nonlinear regression (explicit). The rationale and limitations of both methods are studied on an operating wind turbine where different damage scenarios were introduced. Additionally, the best practices of each procedure are presented through a comprehensive discussion of their potential advantages and drawbacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Worden K, Cross EJ, Barthorpe RJ, Wagg DJ, Gardner P (2020) On digital twins, mirrors, and virtualizations: frameworks for model verification and validation. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part B: Mech Eng 6(3)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farrar CR, Worden K (2007) An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transictions of the Royal society A. Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):303–15

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sohn H (2007) Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transictions of the Royal society A. Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):539–60

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avendaño-Valencia LD, Chatzi EN (2020) Multivariate GP-VAR models for robust structural identification under operational variability. Probab Eng Mech 60

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aravanis TCI, Sakellariou JS, Fassois SD (2020) A stochastic functional model based method for random vibration based robust fault detection under variable non–measurable operating conditions with application to railway vehicle suspensions. J  Sound and Vib 466

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu XQ, Law SS (2015) Structural health monitoring based on vehicle-bridge interaction: accomplishments and challenges. Adv Struct Eng 18 (12)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bogoevska S, Spiridonakos M, Chatzi E, Dumova-Jovanoska E, Höffer R (2017) A data-driven diagnostic framework for wind turbine structures: a holistic approach. Sensors 17(4)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Movsessian A, Qadri BA, Tcherniak D, Garcia Cava D, Ulriksen MD (2021) Mitigation of environmental variabilities in damage detection: a comparative study of two semi-supervised approaches. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Dynamic 1

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yuen KV, Kuok SC (2010) Ambient interference in long-term monitoring of buildings. Eng Struct 32(8)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen MH (2007) Aeroelastic instability problems for wind turbines. Wind Energy 10

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farrar CR, Worden K (2012) Structural health monitoring: a machine learning perspective

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aravanis T-CI, Sakellariou JS, Fassois SD (2020) A stochastic functional model based method for random vibration based robust fault detection under variable non–measurable operating conditions with application to railway vehicle suspensions. J  Sound Vib 466

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sohn H, Worden K, Farrar CR (2002) Statistical damage classification under changing environmental and operational conditions. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 13(9)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Avendaño-Valencia LD, Chatzi EN, Koo KY, Brownjohn JMW (2017) Gaussian process time-series models for structures under operational variability. Fron Built Environ 3

    Google Scholar 

  15. Worden K, Sohn, H. and Farrar, CR (2002) Novelty detection in a changing environment: regression and interpolation approaches. J Sound Vib 258(4)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xia Y, Hao H, Zanardo G, Deeks (2006) A long term vibration monitoring of an RC slab: temperature and humidity effect. Eng Struct 28(3)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schlechtingen M, Ferreira Santos I (2011) Comparative analysis of neural network and regression based condition monitoring approaches for wind turbine fault detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(5):5

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kopsaftopoulos F, Nardari R, Li YH, Chang FK (2018) A stochastic global identification framework for aerospace structures operating under varying flight states. Mech Syst Signal Process 98

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spiridonakos MD, Chatzi EN (2015) Metamodeling of dynamic nonlinear structural systems through polynomial chaos NARX models. Comput Struct 157

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, Second

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Laory I, Trinh TN, Smith IFC, Brownjohn JMW (2014) Methodologies for predicting natural frequency variation of a suspension bridge. Eng Struct 80

    Google Scholar 

  22. Avendaño-Valencia LD, Chatzi EN, Tcherniak D (2020) Gaussian process models for mitigation of operational variability in the structural health monitoring of wind turbines. Mech Syst Signal Process 142

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tipping ME (2001) Sparse bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res 1(3)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gómez González A, Fassois SD (2016) A supervised vibration-based statistical methodology for damage detection under varying environmental conditions & its laboratory assessment with a scale wind turbine blade. J Sound Vib 366

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deraemaeker A, Reynders E, De Roeck G, Kullaa J (2008) Vibration-based structural health monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(1)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Deraemaeker A, Worden K (2018) A comparison of linear approaches to filter out environmental effects in structural health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 105

    Google Scholar 

  27. García D, Tcherniak D (2019) An experimental study on the data-driven structural health monitoring of large wind turbine blades using a single accelerometer and actuator. Mech Syst Signal Process 127

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yan A-M, Kerschen G, De Boe P, Golinval J-C (2005) Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: a linear analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 19(4)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Movsessian A, Garcia D, Tcherniak D (2020) Adaptive feature selection for enhancing blade damage diagnosis on an operational wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harvey DY, Todd MD (2012) Cointegration as a data normalization tool for structural health monitoring applications. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol 8348

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cross EJ, Worden K, Chen Q (2011) Cointegration: a novel approach for the removal of environmental trends in structural health monitoring data. Philosophical Transictions of the Royal society A. Math Phys Eng Sci 467(2133)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zolna K, Dao PB, Staszewski WJ, Barszcz T (2015) Nonlinear cointegration approach for condition monitoring of wind turbines. Math Probl Eng 2015

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shi H, Worden K, Cross EJ (2018) A regime-switching cointegration approach for removing environmental and operational variations in structural health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 103

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yan A-M, Kerschen G, De Boe P, Golinval J-C (2005) Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—part II: local PCA for non-linear cases. Mech Syst Signal Process (19)4

    Google Scholar 

  35. Santos A, Figueiredo E, Silva MFM, Sales CS, Costa JCWA (2016) Machine learning algorithms for damage detection: Kernel-based approaches. J Sound Vib 363

    Google Scholar 

  36. Movsessian A, Garcia Cava D, Tcherniak D (2021) An artificial neural network methodology for damage detection: demonstration on an operating wind turbine blade. Mech Syst Signal Process 159

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao R, Yan R, Chen Z, Mao K, Wang P, Gao RX (2019) Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 115

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tibaduiza D, Torres-Arredondo MÁ, Vitola J, Anaya M, Pozo F (2018) A damage classification approach for structural health monitoring using machine learning. Complexity

    Google Scholar 

  39. Silva M, Santos A, Santos R, Figueiredo E, Sales C, Costa JCWA (2017) Agglomerative concentric hypersphere clustering applied to structural damage detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 92

    Google Scholar 

  40. Langone R, Reynders E, Mehrkanoon S, Suykens JAK (2017) Automated structural health monitoring based on adaptive kernel spectral clustering. Mech Syst Signal Process 90

    Google Scholar 

  41. Baraldi P, Di Maio F, Rigamonti M, Zio E, Seraoui R (2016) Clustering for unsupervised fault diagnosis in nuclear turbine shut-down transients. Mech Syst Signal Process 58

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kostic B, Gül M (2017) Vibration-based damage detection of bridges under varying temperature effects using time-series analysis and artificial neural networks, J Bridge Eng 22(10)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Roberts C, Cava Garcia D, Avendaño-Valencia LD (2021) Understanding the influence of environmental and operational variability on wind turbine blade monitoring. In: Rizzo P, Milazzo A (eds) European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. EWSHM 2020. Lecture notes in civil engineering, vol 127. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_12

  44. Movsessian A, Garcia D, Tcherniak D (2020) Adaptive feature selection for enhancing blade damage diagnosis on an operational wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures

    Google Scholar 

  45. Alvarez MA, Rosasco L, Neil D, Lawrence ND (2011) Kernels for vector-valued functions: a review. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1106.6251

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mr. Callum Roberts and Dr. David García Cava would like to acknowledge Carnegie Trust for the Caledonian Ph.D. Scholarship (grant reference number: PHD007700).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David García Cava .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

García Cava, D., Avendaño-Valencia, L.D., Movsessian, A., Roberts, C., Tcherniak, D. (2022). On Explicit and Implicit Procedures to Mitigate Environmental and Operational Variabilities in Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring. In: Cury, A., Ribeiro, D., Ubertini, F., Todd, M.D. (eds) Structural Health Monitoring Based on Data Science Techniques. Structural Integrity, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81716-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81716-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81715-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81716-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics