Skip to main content

Regional Governance: The Case of the Barents Region

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Arctic

Abstract

Since the end of the Cold War, the Barents region has experienced a unique and complex governance model in the Arctic. Remembering that this part of the Arctic has been connected to Europe since the Viking era, it stands as a singular case for the whole Polar region. For centuries, this subarctic region was under the influence of Norwegian–Russian relationships and their dynamics. The institutionalization process since the 1990s has mainly focused on economic, social, and environmental matters. Diversity in stakeholders and institutional multilayers are critical features of regional governance. In the light of the Ukrainian crisis and the annexation of Crimea in 2014, the Barents region endured its most serious test after the Cold War. However, despite a significant increase in military activities, these new geopolitical conditions did not break long-standing cooperation. At a time when economic opportunities are soaring in the region, climate change and biodiversity losses are threatening socio-economic conditions: the Barents area must address extraordinary challenges. From oil and gas projects to tourism development, the Barents region presents itself as a showcase for socio-ecological balance in the Arctic. However, its institutional arrangements are set to face growing tests of its resilience. From a multidisciplinary perspective, this chapter will highlight how regional governance has been shaped over recent decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Kirkenes declaration was signed by the foreign ministers and other delegates from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden and the Commission of the European Communities.

  2. 2.

    It includes the following Barents administrative units: Lapland, Oulu Region, Kainuu and North Karelia (Finland); Nordland and Troms og Finnmark (Norway ); Arkhangelsk Region, Murmansk Region, Karelia, Komi and Nenets (Russia ); Norrbotten and Västerbotten (Sweden).

References

  • Aas, S. (2012). Norwegian and Soviet/Russian World War II memory policy during the cold war and the post-Soviet years. Acta Borealia: A Nordica Journal of Circumpolar Societies, 29(2), 216–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arctic Council. (1996). Declaration on the establishment of the Arctic council 1996 – Ottawa declaration. Ottawa: Arctic Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulègue, M. (2019). Russia’s military posture in the Arctic. Managing hard power in a “low tension” environment. NDC Research Paper. Rome: NATO Defence College.

    Google Scholar 

  • EJA (2020). Protest against heavy pollution from Russian nickel plant in Kirkenes, Norway. Environmental Justice Atlas. https://ejatlas.org/conflict/protest-against-heavy-pollution-from-russian-nickel-plant-kirkenes-norway. Accessed 5 December 2020.

  • Esperitu, A. (2015). Moving forward: Strengthening cooperation in today’s Barents region. Barents Studies: Peoples, Economies and Politics, 1(3), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, M. (2016). The Arctic, laboratory of the Anthropocene. In L. Heininen (Ed.), Future security of the Global Arctic: State policy, economic security and climate (pp. 121–137). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fressoz, J.-B. (2016). La main invisible a-t-elle le pouce vert? Les faux-semblants de “l’écologie industrielle” au XIXe siècle. Techniques & Culture, “Réparer le monde. Excès, reste et innovation” 65–66, 324–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fressoz, J.-B. (2020). L’Anthropocène est un “accumulocène”. Regards croisés sur l’économie, 26, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • González de Molina, M., & Toledo, V. M. (2014). The social metabolism. A socio-ecological theory of historical change. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06358-4_3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorbachev, M. (1987). Mikhail Gorbachev’s speech in Murmansk at the ceremonial meeting on the occasion of the presentation of the order of Lenin and the gold star to the City of Murmansk. Murmansk. https://www.barentsinfo.fi/docs/Gorbachev_speech.pdf. Accessed 5 December 2020.

  • Gras, A. (2016). The deadlock of the thermo-industrial civilization: The (impossible?) energy transition in the Anthropocene. In E. Garcia, M. Martinez-Iglesias, & P. Kirby (Eds.), Transitioning to a post-carbon society (pp. 3–35). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. I. (2006). Sami fisheries in the pre-modern era: Household sustenance and market relations. Acta Borealia, 23(1), 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstra, T., & Samplonius, K. (1995). Viking expansion northwards: Mediæval sources. Arctic, 48(3), 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hønneland, G. (1998). Identity formation in the Barents Euro-Arctic region. Cooperation and Conflict, 33(3), 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hønneland, G. (2013). Borderland Russians. In Identity, narrative and international relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossein, K., Zojer, G., Greaves, W., Roncero, M., & Sheehan, M. (2016). Constructing Arctic security: An inter-disciplinary approach to understanding security in the Barents region. Polar Record, 53(1), 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRP. (2019). Global resources outlook 2019: Natural resources for the future we want. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, I., Sydnes, A. K., Duda, P. I., Nikitina, E., & Webersik, C. (2020). Norway-Russia disaster diplomacy for Svalbard. Safety Science, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104896.

  • Kikkert, P., & Lackenbauer, W. (2019). The militarization of the Arctic to 1990. In K. Coates & C. Holroyd (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of Arctic policy and politics (pp. 487–505). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenigstein, S. (2020). Arctic marine ecosystems, climate change impacts, and governance responses: An integrated perspectives from the Barents Sea. In E. Pongracz, V. Pavlov, & N. Hänninen (Eds.), Arctic marine sustainability. Arctic maritime businesses and the resilience of the marine environment (pp. 45–71). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnozhenova, E., Kulik, S., & Lokhova, T. (2020). Arctic transportation system during World War II. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 404. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/434/1/012002.

  • Kusmenko, J. (2009). Sámi and Scandinavians in the Viking Age. Scandinavistica Vilnensis, 2, 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvistad, J. M. (1995). The Barents Spirit. A bridge-building project in the wake of the cold war. Oslo: Institutt for forsvarsstudier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, S., Ingvelsen, R. B., & Furevik, T. (2018). Arctic warming hotspot in the northern Barents Sea linked to declining sea-ice import. Nature, 8, 634–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • LKAB. (2020). Historic transformation plan for LKAB: “The biggest thing we in Sweden can do for the climate”. Luleå: LKAB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzin, D. (2007). The northern sea route during World War II, 1939–1945. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 20(3), 421–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinova, O. (2017). Political uses of the great patriotic war in post-Soviet Russia from Yeltsin to Putin. In J. Fedor, M. Kangaspuro, J. Lassila, & T. Zhurzhenko. War and memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus (pp. 43–70). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medby, I. A. (2014). Arctic state, Arctic nation? Arctic national identity among the post-Cold War generation in Norway. Polar Geography, 37(3), 252–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, M., Sommerkorn, M., Cassotta, S., Derksen, C., Ekaykin, A., Hollowed, A., Kofinas, G., Mackintosh, A., Melbourne-Thomas, J., Muelbert, M. M. C., Ottersen, G., Pritchard, H., & Schuur, E. A. G. (2019). Polar Regions. In H.-O. Pörtner et al. (Eds.), IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate (pp. 203–320). Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, J. E. (2019). Trilateral defence cooperation in the North: An assessment of interoperability between Norway, Sweden and Finland. Defence Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2019.1634473.

  • Nilsen, T. (2017). Europe’s northernmost cross-border highway to get charger network for electric cars. The Barents Observer.. https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/ecology/2017/11/europes-northernmost-cross-border-highway-get-charger-network-electric-cars. Accessed 5 December 2020.

  • Nilsen, T. (2018). US and Norway upgrade eye on border to northern Russia. The Barents Observer. https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2018/11/us-and-norway-upgrades-eye-northern-russia. Accessed 5 December 2020.

  • Nilsen, T. (2019). Norway’s enviro minister brings dispute on cross-border pollution to Moscow. The Barents Observer. https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/ecology/2019/01/norways-enviro-minister-brings-cross-border-pollution-moscow. Accessed 5 December 2020.

  • Norway. (2016). Capable and sustainable. Long Term Defence Plan. Oslo: Forsvarsdepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norway. (2018). Fokus 2018. Etterretningstenesta si vurdering av aktuelle tryggingsutfordringar. Oslo: Etterretningstenesta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, A. (2020). Sámi’s enactments of the Arctic railway: Sustainable development or environmental injustice?. Versus. https://www.versuslehti.fi/gradusta-asiaa/samis-enactments-of-the-arctic-railway-sustainable-development-or-environmental-injustice/. Accessed 5 December 2020.

  • Rønning Balsvik, R. (2015). Russia and Norway: Research collaboration and comparison of asymmetrical relations. Acta Borealia. https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2015.1029850.

  • Schram Stokke, O. (2011). Environmental security in the Arctic: The Case for Multilevel Governance. International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070201106600412.

  • Schram Stokke, O., & Tunander, O. (1994). The Barents region. Cooperation in Arctic Europe. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, T. (2005). Across the Borders: The Pomor trade. In T. Jackson & J. P. Nielsen (Eds.), Russia-Norway: Physical and symbolic Borders (pp. 105–115). Moscow: Languages of Slavonic Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöholm, J. (2017). Authenticity and relocation of built heritage: The urban transformation of Kiruna, Sweden. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 7(2), 110–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spracklen, K. (2016). Theorising northernness and northern culture: the north of England, northern Englishness, and sympathetic magic. Journal for Cultural Research, 20(1), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staun, J. (2017). Russia’s strategy in the Arctic: Cooperation, not confrontation. Polar Record, 53(3), 314–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suprun, M. (2020). The liberation of northern Norway in Stalin’s post-war strategy. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 33(2), 227–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweden. (2019). Swedish chairmanship priorities for Nordefco 2019. Stockholm: Försvarsdepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweden. (2020a). Statement of intention enhanced operational cooperation among the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Finland, the Ministry of Defence of the Kingdom of Norway and the Ministry of Defence of the Kingdom of Sweden. Stockholm: Försvarsdepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweden. (2020b). Sveriges strategi för den arktiska regionen. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.

    Google Scholar 

  • The GIUK Gap. (2019). The GIUK Gap’s strategic significance. Strategic Comments, 25(8), i–iii. https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2019.1684626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The GIUK Gap. (2020). The Arctic railway. Risks and Opportunities. Rovaniemi: House of Lapland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuen, T. (1993). Two Epochs of Norwegian-Russian trade relations: From symmetry to asymmetry. Acta Borealia: A Nordic Journal of Circumpolar Societies, 10(20), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen, R. (2019). European fantasy of the Arctic region and the rise of indigenous Sámi voices in the global arena. In N. Selheim, Y. V. Zaika, & I. Kelman (Eds.), Arctic triumph. Northern innovative and persistence (pp. 23–40). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (2016). Barents region: The Arctic council as a stabilizing magnet. In L. Heininen, H. Exner-Pirot, & J. Plouffe (Eds.), Arctic yearbook 2016 (pp. 224–246). Akureyri, Iceland: Northern Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (2018). The Barents Sea: Environment cooperation in the Anthropocene era. E-International Relations. www.e-ir.info/2018/05/06/the-barents-sea-environment-cooperation-in-the-anthropocene-era. Accessed 5 December 2020.

  • Wither, J. K. (2018). Svalbard. The RUSI Journal, 163(5), 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2010). Arctic governance – Pathways to the future. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 1(2), 164–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2012). Building an international regime complex for the Arctic: Current status and next steps. The Polar Journal, 2(2), 391–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachrisson, I. (2008). The Sámi and their interaction with the Nordic peoples. In S. Brink & N. Price (Eds.), The Viking World (pp. 32–39). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerbauer, K. (2012). Unusual regionalism in Northern Europe: The Barents region in the making. Regional Studies, 47(1), 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vidal, F. (2022). Regional Governance: The Case of the Barents Region. In: Finger, M., Rekvig, G. (eds) Global Arctic. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81253-9_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics