Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender, Power and Corporatism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Partners and Gender Equality

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics ((GAP))

Abstract

In the introductory chapter to this volume, we suggest that focussing on social partners representing employees and employers provides important new insights for gender and politics scholarship. Analysing social partners and corporatist processes helps to explain the persistence of gendered inequalities in the labour market and problems in gender equality policy adoption and implementation. Studying social partners is all the more important in the current political context shaped by neo-liberalisation and crises, where traditional gender equality actors have been losing ground and where corporatist power relations are changing. We argue that social partners should be seen as important, although not necessarily benevolent, actors for gender equality with powers to advance and oppose gender equality through collective bargaining and social dialogue. Moreover, corporatist systems, practices and institutions are gendered in their functioning and create gendered effects, for example, by upholding rather than contesting the systemic undervaluation of feminised work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotions. Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaszak, L. (2010). The women’s movement inside and outside the state. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassel, L., & Emejulu, A. (2017). Minority women and austerity: Survival and resistance in France and Britain. Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist, C. (1991). Corporatism and gender equality: A comparative study of two Swedish labour market organisations. European Journal of Political Research, 20, 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergqvist, C., BjarnegÃ¥rd, E., & Zetterberg, P. (2016). When class trumps sex: The social democratic intra-party struggle over extending parental leave quotas in Sweden. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 23(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, P. M. (2020). Corporatism (and neo-corporatism). In P. Harris, A. Bitonti, C. S. Fleisher, & A. Skorkjaer Binderkrantz (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of interest groups, lobbying and public affairs. Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_36-1.

  • Cockburn, C. (1996). Strengthening the representation of trade union women in the European social dialogue. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 3(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colgan, F., & Ledwith, S. (Eds.). (2002). Gender, diversity, and trade unions: International perspectives. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colling, T., & Dickens, L. (1998). Selling the case for gender equality: Deregulation and equality bargaining. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36(3), 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency and politics (pp. 1–46). Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In K. Bartlett & R. Kennedy (Eds.), Feminist legal theory: Readings in law and gender (pp. 57–80). Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, P., & Murphy, M. P. (2017). Gendered mobilizations against austerity in Ireland. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culpepper, P. D., & Regan, A. (2014). Why don’t governments need trade unions anymore? The death of social pacts in Ireland and Italy. Socio-Economic Review, 12(4), 723–745. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwt028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, T. (2014). Collective bargaining and the gender pay gap in the printing industry. Gender, Work & Organization, 21(5), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, L. (2000). Collective bargaining and the promotion of gender equality at work: Opportunities and challenges for trade unions. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 6(2), 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, E. (2021). The care crisis. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elomäki, A., & Kantola, J. (2020). European social partners as gender equality actors in EU social and economic governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 999–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elomäki, A., & Kantola, J. (2017). Austerity politics and feminist resistance in Finland: From established women’s organizations to new feminist initiatives. In J. Kantola & E. Lombardo (Eds.), Gender and the economic crisis in Europe: Politics, institutions and intersectionality (pp. 231–255). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elomäki, A., Koskinen Sandberg, P., Kantola, J., & Saari, M. (2019). Työmarkkinajärjestöt valtiollisen tasa-arvopolitiikan tyhjiötä täyttämässä? Työmarkkinakeskusjärjestöjen tasa-arvoulostulot vuosina 2010–2017. Sosiologia, 56(2), 122–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elomäki, A., Mustosmäki, A., & Koskinen Sandberg, P. (2021). The sidelining of gender equality in a corporatist and knowledge-oriented regime: The case of failed family leave reform in Finland. Critical Social Policy, 41(2), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018320947060.

  • Engeli, I., & Mazur, A. (2018). Taking implementation seriously in assessing success: The politics of gender equality policy. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, J. (2021). A special fund for gender equality? Institutional constraints and gendered consequences in Swedish collective bargaining. Gender, Work & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12645.

  • Fraser, N. (2016). Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Review, 100, 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume, C. (2015). Understanding the variations of unions’ litigation strategies to Promote equal pay: Reflection on the British case. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(2), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bev004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haastrup, T., & Kenny, M. (2016). Gendering institutionalism: A feminist institutionalist approach to EU integration theory. In G. Abels & H. MacRae (Eds.), Gendering European integration theory (pp. 197–216). Barbara Budrich.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hill Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heery, E. (2006). Equality bargaining: Where, who, why? Gender Work & Organization, 13(6), 522–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (Eds.). (2017a). Gender and the economic crisis in Europe. Politics, institutions, and intersectionality. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017b). Gender and political analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2019). Populism and feminist politics: The cases of Finland and Spain. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1108–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamessini, M., & Rubery, J. (2014). Women and austerity: The economic crisis and the future for gender equality. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, G. (2013). Gender and leadership in unions. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, G. (2017). From ‘a woman’s place is in her union’ to ‘strong unions need women’: Changing gender discourses, policies and realities in the union movement. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work, 27(4), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2017.1406175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, G., & Greene, A. M. (2002). The dynamics of positive action in UK trade unions: The case of women and black members. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(2), 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen Sandberg, P. (2016). Non-decision making in the reform of equal pay policy: The case of Finnish gender equality legislation. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(4), 280–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen Sandberg, P., Törnroos, M., & Kohvakka, R. (2018). The institutionalised undervaluation of women’s work: The case of local government sector collective agreements. Work, Employment and Society, 32(4), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017017711100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kylä-Laaso, M., & Koskinen Sandberg, P. (2020). Affective institutional work and ordoliberal governance: Gender equality in the parliamentary debates on the Competitiveness Pact in Finland. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 28(2), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2019.1697749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kylä-Laaso, M., Koskinen Sandberg, P., & Hokkanen, J. (2021). Gender equality and the feminised public sector in the affective struggles over the Finnish Competitiveness Pact. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(4), 1507–1523. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12693.

  • Lammi-Taskula, J., & Takala, P. (2009). Negotiating tri-partite compromises. In S. B. Kamerman & P. Moss (Eds.), The politics of parental leave policies: Children, parenting, gender and the labour market (pp. 87–102). Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ledwith, S., & Hansen, L. L. (Eds.). (2017). Gendering and diversifying trade union leadership. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, E. (2016). Social constructivism in European integration theories: Gender and intersectionality perspectives. In G. Abels & H. MacRae (Eds.), Gendering European integration theory: Engaging new dialogues (pp. 123–146). Barbara Budrich.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, P. (2015). Coordinated bargaining in Europe: From incremental corrosion to frontal assault? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 21(2), 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, A. (2001). Gender democracy in trade unions. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ost, D. (2000). Illusory corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal tripartite and post communist class identities. Politics & Society, 28(4), 503–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329200028004004.

  • Outshoorn, J., & Kantola, J. (Eds.). (2007). Changing state feminism. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedwell, C. (2014). Affective relations: The transnational politics of empathy. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillinger, J., & Wintour, N. (2019). Collective bargaining and gender equality. Agenda Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prugl, E. (1999). What is a worker? Gender, global restructuring and the ILO Convention on homework. In M. K. Meyer & E. Prugl (Eds.), Gender politics in global governance (pp. 197–209). Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathgeb, P., & Tassinari, A. (2020). How the Eurozone disempowers trade unions: The political economy of competitive internal devaluation. Socio-Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2013). Gender equality, intersectionality and diversity in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. (1988). Gender antagonism and class conflict: Exclusionary strategies of male trade unionists in nineteenth-century Britain. Social History, 13(2), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saari, M., Kantola, J., & Koskinen Sandberg, P. (2021). Implementing equal pay policy: Clash between gender equality and corporatism. Social Politics, 28(2), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research, 36(2), 175–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. (Ed.). (2007). Multiple meanings of gender equality: A critical frame analysis of gender policies in Europe. Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gyes, G., & Schulten, T. (Eds). (2015). Wage bargaining under the new European economic governance—Alternative strategies for inclusive growth. ETUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesa, J., Kantola, A., & Skorkjaer Binderkrantz, A. (2018). A stronghold of routine corporatism? The involvement of interest groups in policy making in Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies, 41(4), 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (2020). Varieties of gender regimes. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaa018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, S., & Baird, M. (2014). Gender equality bargaining: Developing theory and practice. Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. (2004). Building velvet triangles: Gender and informal governance. In S. Piattoni & T. Christensen (Eds.), Informal governance and the European Union. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Anna Elomäki, Johanna Kantola & Paula Koskinen Sandberg

Authors
  1. Anna Elomäki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johanna Kantola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paula Koskinen Sandberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Elomäki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Anna Elomäki

  2. Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Johanna Kantola

  3. Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Paula Koskinen Sandberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Elomäki, A., Kantola, J., Koskinen Sandberg, P. (2022). Gender, Power and Corporatism. In: Elomäki, A., Kantola, J., Koskinen Sandberg, P. (eds) Social Partners and Gender Equality. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81178-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation