Abstract
The research presented in this chapter focusses on exploring gender differences regarding the access to higher education (HE) and the secondary students’ choice of type of HE institution. The questionnaire was administered to 1814 secondary school students in Croatia in 2014/2015, with an average age of 19. The research draws on Bourdieu’s theory of cultural, economic and social capital with the integration of students’ opinion on HE institutions and gender perspective. Hierarchical regression analyses indicate that the students’ gender intersects with the cultural capital and the students’ opinion on HE institutions in shaping their decision to attend HE and their choice of type of HE institution. Differences in the structure of cultural capital of male and female students’ that influence choice of HE institution point to its stereotypical nature. Furthermore, female students are more concerned than male students about whether their choice of study is appropriate for their gender, while for male students the prestige of higher education institutions is more important.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a detailed description of all scales in the research, see Baranovic et al. (2015).
References
Aschaffenburg, K., & Maas, I. (1997). Cultural and educational careers. American Sociological Review, 62(1), 573–557.
Baranovic, B. (2000). Image of the women in literature textbooks. Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
Baranovic, B. (2015). Development and social dimension of HE in Croatia. In B. Baranovic (Ed.), What do high school students plan to study? – Access to HE and choice of study (pp. 15–40). Zagreb.
Baranovic, B., & Doolan, K. (2005). Citizenship education. The case of Croatia. In B. Maes (Ed.), Different faces of citizenship. Development of citizenship education in European countries (pp. 31–50). Enschede.
Baranovic, B., Doolan, K., Jugovic, I., Klepac, O., Kosutic, I., & Puzic, S. (2015). Theoretical framework, objectives and methodology of research. In B. Baranovic (Ed.), What do high school students plan to study? – Access to HE and choice of study (pp. 107–121). Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
Baranovic, B., Jugovic, I., & Puzic, S. (2014). The importance of family background and gender for mathematics achievement and secondary school choice. Croatian Journal of Social Politics, 21(3), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v21i3.1174
Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In R. Brown (Ed.), Knowledge, education and cultural change (pp. 71–112). Tavistock.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). The forms of capitals. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 46–58). Oxford University Press.
Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134719
Croatian Bureau of Statistics database. (2020). Women and men in Croatia. https://www.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/menandwomen/men_and_women_2020.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2020.
DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: the impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. High School Students. American Sociological Review, 47(2), 189–201.
Dumais, S. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 44–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090253
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., & Meece, J. L. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 26–43.
Egerton, M., & Halsey, A. H. (1993). Trends by social class and gender in access to HE in Britain. Oxford Review of Education, 19(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498930190205
Eurostat database. (2020). Tertiary education statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Tertiary_education_statistics#Fields_of_education. Accessed 12 June 2020.
Fiúza, A. L., Pinto, N. M., & Costa, E. R. (2016). Gender inequality in public university: The practice of professors of agricultural science. Educação e Pesquisa, 42(3), 803–818.
Jokic, B., & Ristic Dedic, Z. (2010). Differences in educational attainment of third and seventh grade pupils in Croatia with respect to gender and parents’ educational level: A population perspective. Croatian Journal of Social Politics, 11(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v17i3.954
Jugovic, I., Doolan, K., & Baranovic, B. (2016, August). Gendered course choices: Rationalization and embodiment. Paper presented at the Conference of European Educational Research Association (ECER) and University College Dublin, Dublin.
Kalmijn, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (1996). Race, cultural capital, and schooling. An analysis of trends in the United States. Sociology of Education, 69(1), 22–34.
Kataoka, E. (2015). Gender differences in the effects of cultural capital and shadow education on educational attainment in Japan. Komazawa Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 53–87.
Katsillis, J., & Rubinson, R. (1990). Cultural capital, student achievement, and educational reproduction: The case of Greece. American Sociological Review, 55(1), 270–279.
Kaufman, J., & Gabler, J. (2004). Cultural capital and the extracurricular activities of males and females in the college attainment process. Poetics, 32(1), 145–168.
Laberge, S. (1995). Toward an integration of gender into Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12(1), 132–146.
Lehman, B., & Dumais, S. A. (2016). Feminization of arts participation and extracurricular activities? Gender differences in cultural capital and bullying victimization. Poetics, 61(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.12.003
McCall, L. (1992). Does gender fit? Bourdieu, feminism, and conception of social order. Theory and Society, 21(1), 837–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992814
Mohr, J., & DiMaggio, P. (1995). The intergenerational transmission of cultural capital. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 14(1), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9096-4
OECD. (2015). The ABC of gender equality in education: aptitude, behaviour, confidence, PISA. OECD Publishing.
Parvazian, S., Gill, J., & Chiera, B. (2017). HE, women, and sociocultural change: A closer look at the statistics. SAGEOpen, 1(4–6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017700230
Reay, D. (1998). Cultural reproduction: Mother’s involvement in their children’s primary schooling. In M. Grenfell & D. James (Eds.), Bourdieu and education: Acts of practical theory (pp. 55–71). Falmer Press.
Sheng, X. (2015). Gender and habitus: Parental involvement in students’ subject choices in China. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(2), 227–238.
Ullah, H., & Ali, J. (2012). Male hegemony through education: Construction of gendered identities. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 1(3), 215–242.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baranović, B., Rogošić, S. (2021). How Gender and Economic, Cultural and Social Capital Influence Educational Decisions of Students in the Croatian Context?. In: Carlson, M., Halldórsdóttir, B.E., Baranović, B., Holm, AS., Lappalainen, S., Spehar, A. (eds) Gender and Education in Politics, Policy and Practice . Transdisciplinary Perspectives in Educational Research, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80902-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80902-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80901-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80902-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)