Skip to main content

Article 29 and Its Translation into Policy and Practice in Scotland: An Impossible Right to Education?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Children’s Rights from International Educational Perspectives

Part of the book series: Transdisciplinary Perspectives in Educational Research ((TPER,volume 2))

Abstract

This chapter concentrates on the intersection of the right to education through UNCRC Article 29 with traditions of education. It is, therefore, concerned with some of the implications of translating this legal text into the specific educational contexts impacting on the lives of children and young people at the present time. The chapter, therefore, responds to recent work in the field of children’s rights that calls for approaches that are both more critical and more theoretically adventurous. This critical and theory-informed approach necessarily extends to thinking about the kinds of education that are both implied and enacted – in the name of the UNCRC – within particular settings. Here, a case study of the translation of children’s rights within the context of the Scottish education system will ground the discussion and help surface assumptions that might otherwise remain hidden. The chapter concludes with some observations concerning difficulties faced in constructing a universal appeal to education and, in the light of this, the importance of attending to ways of negotiating difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The focus on the processes of translation from finished text (UNCRC) to its material instantiations also tends to eclipse from view the process of the text’s own construction during the years 1979–1989: see Quennerstedt et al. (2018) on this.

  2. 2.

    Space does not permit a detailed analysis of the understandings of ‘health and wellbeing’ that are in play in this discourse: on this, see Spratt (2016, 2017) for a detailed account.

  3. 3.

    In Scotland, the General Teaching Council Scotland (GTCS), the official body responsible for teacher registration, has various Professional Standards for different roles and stages in a teacher’s career, each with multiple indicators (GTCS, 2019). School Inspectors use a text entitled How Good is our School? (Education Scotland, 2015), which consists in hundreds of performance indicators (renamed “quality indicators”) that are used to assess educational practice. As regards the latter, it is noteworthy that at no point is the “good” in the title actually defined; it is simply resolved into a successful alignment with the aforementioned performance indicators.

References

  • Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 113–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2005). Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling, J. (1994). Child-centred education and its critics. Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Scotland. (2015). How good is our school? (4th ed.). Education Scotland. https://education.gov.scot/improvement/documents/frameworks_selfevaluation/frwk2_nihedithgios/frwk2_hgios4.pdf. Accessed Aug 2019.

  • General Teaching Council Scotland (GTCS). (2019). Professional standards. https://www.gtcs.org.uk/professional-standards/professional-standards.aspx. Accessed 15 Aug 2019.

  • Hirst, P. H. (1966). Educational theory. In J. W. Tibble (Ed.), The study of education (pp. 29–58). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzscheiter, A., Josefsson, J., & Sandin, B. (2019). Child rights governance: An introduction. Childhood, 26(3), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, A. (2015). The idea of Bildung in the current educational discourse: A response to Irene Heidt. L2 Journal, 7(4), 17–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I’Anson, J. (2016). UNCRC at 25: A critical assessment of achievements and trajectories with reference to educational research. In V. Coppock & J. Gillett-Swan (Eds.), Children’s rights, educational research and the UNCRC (pp. 17–37). Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • I’Anson, J., & Jasper, A. (2017). Schooling indifference. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • I’Anson, J., Quennerstedt, A., & Robinson, C. (2017). The international economy of children’s rights: Issues in translation. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 25(1), 50–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I’Anson, J. (2018). Children’s rights. In T. Bryce, W. Humes, D. Gillies, & A. Kennedy (Eds.), Scottish education (5th ed.). University of Edinburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, F. (2014). On the universal, the uniform, the common and the dialogue between cultures. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2009). Collateral realities. (December 29, 2009, ver.). www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009CollateralRealities.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2019.

  • Lee, N. (1999). The challenge of childhood: Distributions of childhood’s ambiguity in adult institutions. Childhood, 6(4), 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein, J. (2006). Experience and the limits of governmentality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein, J. (2010a). The idea of critical educational research: Educating the gaze and inviting to go walking. In I. Gurzeev (Ed.), The possibility/impossibility of a new critical language in education (pp. 275–291). Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masschelein, J. (2010b). E-ducating the gaze: The idea of a poor pedagogy. Ethics and Education, 5(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quennerstedt, A. (2010). Children, but not really humans? Critical reflections on the hampering effect of the “3 p’s”. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18, 619–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quennerstedt, A. (2013). Children’s rights research moving into the future – Challenges on the way forward. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 21(2), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quennerstedt, A., Robinson, C., & I’Anson, J. (2018). The UNCRC – The voice of global consensus on children’s rights? Nordic Journal of Human Rights/Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter, 38(1), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Readings, B. (1992). Pagans, perverts or primitives? In P. Dhillon & P. Standish (Eds.), Lyotard: Just education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynaert, D., Bouverne-De Bie, M., & Vandevelde, S. (2012). Between “believers” and “opponents”: Critical discussions on children’s rights. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 20(1), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. (2012). A guide to getting it right for every child. Scottish Government. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0039/00394308.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2019.

  • Scottish Government. (2014). Building the ambition: National practice guidance on early learning and childcare. Scottish Government. Retrieved August 15, 2019, from: https://education.gov.scot/improvement/Pages/elc1buildingtheambition.aspx. Accessed Aug 2019.

  • Scottish Government. (2019). Children’s rights: Consultation on incorporating the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child into our domestic law in Scotland. Retrieved August 15, 2019, from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/childrens-rights-consultation-incorporating-uncrc-rights-child-domestic-law-scotland/pages/2/

  • Spratt, J. (2016). Childhood wellbeing: What role for education? British Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spratt, J. (2017). Wellbeing, equity and education: A critical analysis of policy discourses of wellbeing in schools. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz, S. A., & Biesta, G. (2018). Gert Biesta on thinking philosophically about education; Thinking educationally about philosophy in education and educational research. In J. Quay, J. Bleazby, S. Stolz, M. Toscano, & S. Webster (Eds.), Theory and philosophy in education research: Methodological dialogues. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (2013). Learner-centred education and “cultural translation”. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(1), 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, E. K. M. (2015). Children’s rights and children’s wellbeing: Equivalent policy concepts? Journal of Social Policy, 44(4), 807–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall, E. K. M., & Punch, S. (2012). Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies, 10(3), 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (1989). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). General Assembly resolution 44/25, 20 Nov. 1989. U.N. Doc. A/ RES/44/25. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx. Accessed 15 Aug 2019.

  • United Nations (UN). (2001). General comment no. 1: The aims of education (Article 29). Adopted by the Committee on the Rights of the Child at the Twenty-sixth Session, CRC/GC/2001/1, 17 April 2001. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Education/Training/Compilation/Pages/a)GeneralCommentNo1TheAimsofEducation(article29)(2001).aspx. Accessed July 2019.

  • Young, J. O., & Brunk, C. G. (2012). The ethics of cultural appropriation. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John I’Anson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

I’Anson, J. (2021). Article 29 and Its Translation into Policy and Practice in Scotland: An Impossible Right to Education?. In: Gillett-Swan, J., Thelander, N. (eds) Children’s Rights from International Educational Perspectives. Transdisciplinary Perspectives in Educational Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80861-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80861-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80860-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80861-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics