Skip to main content

Meaning Matters: The Political Language of Islamic Populism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Populism

Abstract

Populism can be understood as a reaction to the adverse effects of neoliberal globalization: growing social inequality and social dislocations that have caused a common sense of alienation among many. The way the reaction is expressed, however, come in fragmented and distinctive ways. Here, we look specifically at the political language of Islamic populism to understand how otherwise diverse sets of social interests can be bound together by forging a particular kind of religiously derived political lexicon. We combine a global and cross-regionally oriented political economy approach to populism with cultural political economy, and show how this political language is shaped, mediated, and mobilized through various media technologies and markets in conjunction with concrete struggles over power and tangible resources. Our focus is on Islamic populism in Indonesia, which we treat in comparative perspective. On the surface, the deployment of religious symbols in electoral competition and public discourses there could be seen as an indicator of ideological contestations within a thriving democracy. However, we suggest that these are mainly being absorbed into the workings of Indonesian capitalism in the interest of already dominant social alliances. In this way, the political language of Islamic populism has posed less of a challenge to established elites than bolstered them. This is made possible by Islamic populism’s ability to mobilize an apparently unified, but actually fragmented, ummah (community of believers) in times of intensified conflict.

This article benefitted from some of the ongoing research conducted under Australian Research Council Discovery Project 180100781.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (2008). Dramas of nationhood: The politics of television in Egypt. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ghazzi, O., & Kraidy, M. M. (2013). Neo-Ottoman Cool 2: Turkish nation branding and Arabic-language transnational broadcasting. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2341–2360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2009). Afterword. In K. Mizuno & P. Phongpaichit (Eds.), Populism in Asia (pp. 217–220). NUS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. R. (1983). Old state, new society: Indonesia’s new order in comparative historical perspective. Journal of Asian Studies, 42(3), 477–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. R. (1990). Language and power: Exploring political cultures in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, P. R. (2000). Elite groups, symbol manipulation and ethnic identity among the Muslims of South Asia. In J. H. Smith (Ed.), Nationalism: Critical concepts in political science (pp. 879–909). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, C. (2008). Chinese big business in Indonesia: The state of capital. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. A. (2004). Islam, charity, and activism: Middle-class networks and social welfare in Egypt, Jordan, and Yemen. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corke, S., Finkel, A., Kramer, A. J., Robbins, C. A., & Schenkkan, N. (2014). Democracy in crisis: Corruption, media, and power in Turkey. Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • DW. (2011, January 28). Protests in Egypt continue despite government shut down of Internet. Retrieved July 2020, from Deutsche Welle: https://www.dw.com/en/protests-in-egypt-continue-despite-government-shut-down-of-internet/a-14801752.

  • DW. (2015, March 20). Indian media milks the beef ban. Retrieved July 2020, from Deutsche Welle: https://www.dw.com/en/indian-media-milks-the-beef-ban/a-18331188.

  • DW. (2016, May 29). Erdogan holds mass celebration on Ottoman conquest anniversary. Retrieved from Deutsche Welle: https://www.dw.com/en/erdogan-holds-mass-celebration-on-ottoman-conquest-anniversary/a-19292255.

  • Eaton, T. (2013). Internet activism and the Egyptian uprisings: Transforming online dissent into the offline world. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 9(2), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elçi, S. E., & Ezgi, A. (2019). Populism in Turkey. In D. Stockemer (Ed.), Populism around the world: A comparative perspective (pp. 89–108). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federspiel, H. M. (2001). Islam and ideologi in the emerging Indonesian state: The Persatuan Islam (PERSIS), 1923 to 1957. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2014). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Formichi, C. (2012). Islam and the making of the nation: Kartosuwiryo and political Islam in twentieth-century Indonesia. KITLV Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudavarthy, A. (2019). India after Modi: Populism and the right. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. R. (2016). Islamic populism in Indonesia and the Middle East. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. R. (2017). Indonesia’s year of democratic setbacks: Towards a new phase of deepening illiberalism? Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 53(3), 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. (2018a). The ‘floating’ ummah in the fall of ‘Ahok’ in Indonesia. In TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2018.16.

  • Hadiz, V. R. (2018b). Imagine all the people? Mobilising Islamic populism for right-wing politics in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(4), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. R., & Chryssogelos, A. (2017). Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspective. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 399–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. R., & Teik, K. B. (2011). Approaching Islam and politics from political economy: A comparative study of Indonesia and Malaysia. The Pacific Review, 24(4), 463–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V., & Rakhmani, I. (2017, December 1). Marketing morality in Indonesia’s democracy. Retrieved July 2019, from Asian Currents: http://asaa.asn.au/marketing-morality-indonesias-democracy/.

  • Hefner, R. W. (1997). Print Islam: Mass media and ideological rivalries among Indonesian Muslims. Indonesia, 64, 77–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefner, R. W. (2012). Islamic radicalism in democratizing Indonesia. In S. Akbarzadeh (Ed.), Routhledge handbook of political Islam (pp. 105–118). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, J. (2007). The ‘disallowed’ political participation of Manila’s urban poor. Democratization, 14(5), 853–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iskaned, E. (2012). Sectarian conflict in Egypt: Coptic media, identity and representation. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffrelot, C., Kohli, A., & Murali, K. (2019). Business and politics in India. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, K. (2018). Authoritarian statism and the new right in Asia’s conservative democracies. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(3), 2–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2004). Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2008). A cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (eds), Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe (pp. 13–39). Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2010). Cultural political economy and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 336–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2008). Recovering a sense of political economy. Political Geography, 27(4), 377–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajimoto, M., & Stanley, S. (2019). Information disorder in Asia and the Pacific: Overview of misinformation ecosystem in Australia, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam. University of Hong Kong. Journalism & Media Studies Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2018). Precarious lives: Job insecurity and well-being in rich democracies. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya, Y. (2018). The conquest of hearts: The central role of Ottoman nostalgia within contemporary Turkish populism. American Journal of Cultural Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-018-0065-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitley, P. (2000). Television, Nation, and Culture in Indonesia. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar HM, S. (2013). Constructing the nation’s enemy: Hindutva, popular culture and the Muslim ‘other’ in Bollywood cinema. Third World Quarterly, 34(3), 458–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, C., & Vormann, B. (2020). When inequalities matter most: The crisis of democracy as a crisis of trust. In M. T. Oswals (Ed.), Mobilization, representation, and responsiveness in the American democracy (pp. 139–156). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, M. (2003). From war–net to net–war: The internet and resistance identities in Indonesia. International Information & Library Review, 35(2–4), 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: Social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makin, A. (2017). Homogenizing Indonesian Islam: Persecution of the Shia Group in Yogyakarta. Studia Islamika, 24(1), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangaldas, L. (2017, June 5). India’s got beef with beef: What you need to know about the country's controversial ‘beef ban’. Retrieved August 2020, from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/leezamangaldas/2017/06/05/indias-got-beef-with-beef-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-countrys-controversial-beef-ban/#6ec8a91553c2.

  • Min, S. S. (2006). ‘Eventing’ the May 1998 affair: Problematic representations of violence in contemporary Indonesia. In C. A. Coppel (Ed.), Violent conflicts in Indonesia: Analysis, representation, resolution (pp. 39–57). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öncü, A. (2005). Becoming “secular Muslims”: Yaşar Nuri Öztiirk as a super-subject on Turkish Television. Religion, Media, and the Public Sphere, 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, R. (2019). Fox populism: Branding conservatism as working class (Vol. 36). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, L. (2015). Modi effect: Inside Narendra Modi’s campaign to transform India. Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakhmani, I. (2016). Mainstreaming Islam in Indonesia: Television, identity, and the middle class. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakhmani, I. (2019). The personal is political: Gendered morality in Indonesia’s halal consumerism. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.2.

  • Rakhmani, I., & Zakiah, A. (2020). Consuming halal Turkish television in Indonesia: A closer look at the social responses towards Muhtesem Yuzyul. In Y. Kaptan, E. Algan, & B. Aydin (Eds.), Television in Turkey local production, transnational expansion and political aspirations (pp. 245–265). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, R. (2006). The neo-liberal revolution: Forging the market state. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, R., & Goodman, D. S. (1996). The new rich in Asia: Mobile phones, McDonalds and middle-class revolution. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G. (2018). Participation without democracy: Containing conflict in Southeast Asia. Cornel University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodan, G., Hewison, K., & Robison, R. (2001). The political economy of South-East Asia: Conflict, crises and change. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saka, E. (2020). Social media and politics in Turkey: A journey through citizen journalism, political trolling, and fake news. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., & Stern, P. N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 311–326). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, A. (1999). A nation in waiting: Indonesia’s search for stability. Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, K., & Hill, D. T. (2007). Media, culture and politics in Indonesia. Equinox Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, J., & Masih, N. (2019, December 11). India passes controversial citizenship law excluding Muslim migrants. Retrieved June 2020, from The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/india-poised-to-pass-controversial-citizenship-law-excluding-muslim-migrants/2019/12/11/ebda6a7e-1b71-11ea-977a-15a6710ed6da_story.html.

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sum, N.-L., & Jessop, B. (2013). Towards a culture political economy: Putting culture in its place in political economy. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartoussieh, K. (2007). Pious stardom: Cinema and the Islamic revival in Egypt. The Arab Studies Journal, 15(1), 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teltumbde, A. (2006). Hindu fundamentalist politics in India: The alliance with the American Empire in South Asia. In V. R. Hadiz (Ed.), Empire and neoliberalism in Asia (pp. 247–261). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (2019). Aspiring Indonesia: Expanding the middle class. The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thwaites, T., Davis, L., & Mules, W. (1994). Tools for Cutural Studies. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vedi Hadiz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rakhmani, I., Hadiz, V. (2022). Meaning Matters: The Political Language of Islamic Populism. In: Oswald, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Populism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics