Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: The Socio-ethical Concern of Logical Empiricism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Socio-Ethical Dimension of Knowledge

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook ((VCIY,volume 26))

  • 297 Accesses

Abstract

In this introduction, various notions of socio-political and ethical engagements are introduced. Some examples from logical empiricism are discussed along with the summaries of the volume’s chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a broad list of social and political values, and a discussion of how they intertwined in the case of logical empiricist philosophy of science, see Richardson (2003).

  2. 2.

    Although he was a member of the Berlin Group (led by Hans Reichenbach), Wolfgang Köhler (1938) also published a long treatise on The Place of Value in a World of Facts. For more on the ethical issues in and the moral philosophy of logical empiricism, see Siegetsleitner (2010, 2014).

  3. 3.

    For an updated view on “logical positivism and the social sciences”, see Uebel (2007, 2010, 2019).

  4. 4.

    One might note here Ernest Nagel as well, who worked out quite specific concerns about the social sciences (mainly during his co-taught seminar with the sociologist Paul Lazarsfeld). On these matters see Neuber (2022).

References

  • Boda, István. 1935. “A VIII. nemzetközi filozófiai kongresszus” [“The 8th international philosophy congress”]. Athenaeum 21: 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, Rudolf. 1934. Theoretische Fragen und praktische Entscheidungen. Natur und Geist 2 (9): 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. ‘Intellectual Autobiography’ and ‘Replies and Systematic Expositions’. In The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, ed. P.A. Schilpp, 1–84. LaSalle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy, Jordi Cat, Lola Fleck, and Thomas Uebel. 1996. Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carus, André W. 2007. Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cat, Jordi, and Adam Tamas Tuboly, eds. 2019. Neurath Reconsidered: New Sources and Perspectives. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damböck, Christian. 2017. »Deutscher Empirismus«. Studien zur Philosophie im deutschsprachigen Raum 1830–1930. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damböck, Christian, Günther Sandner, and Meike Werner, eds. 2021. Logical Empiricism, Life Reform, and the German Youth Movement/Logischer Empirismus, Lebensreform und die deutsche Jugendbewegung. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1939. The Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2020. Carnapian Explication and Ameliorative Analysis: A Systematic Comparison. Synthese 197: 1011–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Philipp. 2021. The Humanistic Background of Science. Edited by G. Reisch and A.T. Tuboly. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G. 1969. Logical Positivism and the Social Sciences. In The Legacy of Logical Positivism, ed. P. Achinstein and S.F. Barker, 163–194. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Don. 2019. Otto Neurath: The Philosopher in the Cave. In Cat and Tuboly 2019: 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Otto. 1932. Zur Biologie der Ethik. Wien: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Felix. 1936/2014. Felix Kaufmann’s Theory and Method in the Social Sciences. Edited by R. S. Cohen and I. K. Helling. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, Wolfgang. 1938. The Place of Value in a World of Facts. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, Viktor. 1937/1981. Foundations for a Scientific Analysis of Value. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, Wolfgang, and Diederick Raven. 2000. The ‘Zilsel Thesis’ in the Context of Edgar Zilsel’s Research Programme. Social Studies of Science 30 (6): 925–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menger, Karl. 1934/1974. Morality, Decision and Social Organization. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Reminiscences of the Vienna Circle and the Mathematical Colloquium. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, Elisabeth. 2003. Philosophy of Science and Democracy: Some Reflections on Philipp Frank’s Relativity—A Richer Truth. In Wissenschaftsphilosophie und Politik / Philosophy of Science and Politics, ed. M. Heidelberger and F. Stadler, 119–138. Wien/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Edgar Zilsel on Historical Laws. In Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation, ed. D. Dieks et al., 521–532. Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neuber, M. 2022. Nagel on the Methodology of the Social Sciences. In Ernest Nagel: Philosophy of Science and the Fight for Clarity, ed. M. Neuber and A.T. Tuboly, 215–232. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, Otto. 1913/1983. The Lost Wanderers of Descartes and the Auxiliary Motive. In Otto Neurath: Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, ed. R.S. Cohen and M. Neurath, 1–12. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1921/1973. Anti-Spengler. In Empiricism and Sociology, ed. M. Neurath and Robert S. Cohen, 158–213. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1946/1983. The Orchestration of the Sciences by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism. In Otto Neurath: Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, ed. R.S. Cohen and M. Neurath, 230–242. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, James. 2017. Carnap, Explication, and Social History. Social Theory and Practice 43 (4): 741–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisch, George. 2005. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Alan. 2003. Tolerance, Internationalism, and Scientific Community in Philosophy: Political Themes in Philosophy of Science, Past and Present. In Wissenschaftsphilosophie und Politik/Philosophy of Science and Politics, ed. M. Heidelberger and F. Stadler, 65–89. Wien/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romizi, Donata. 2012. The Vienna Circle’s ‘Scientific World-Conception’: Philosophy of Science in the Political Arena. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2): 205–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, Moritz. 1908. Lebensweisheit. München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1930/1939. Problems of ethics. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegetsleitner, Anne, ed. 2010. Logischer Empirismus, Werte und Moral. Eine Neubewertung. Wien, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Ethik und Moral im Wiener Kreis. Zur Geschichte eines engagierten Humanismus. Böhlau: Wien.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, John. 1936. Logical Empiricism and the Problem of Causality in Social Science. Erkenntnis 6: 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, Friedrich. 2003. Zur politischen Relevanz und zum kulturellen Kontext des Logischen Empirismus. In Wissenschaftsphilosophie und Politik / Philosophy of Science and Politics, ed. M. Heidelberger and F. Stadler, 9–24. Wien/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, Friedrich, and Thomas Uebel, eds. 2012. Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis. Hrsg. vom Verein Ernst Mach (1929). Vienna/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Matthew. 2008. Mysticism and Marxism: A.S. Eddington, Chapman Cohen, and Political Engagement Through Science Popularization. Minerva 46 (2): 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuboly, Adam Tamas. 2017. Philipp Frank’s Decline and the Crisis of Logical Empiricism. Studies in East European Thought 69 (3): 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uebel, Thomas. 2000. Logical Empiricism and the Sociology of Knowledge: The Case of Neurath and Frank. Philosophy of Science 67: 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Philosophy of Social Science in Early Logical Empiricism: The Case of Radical Physicalism. In The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, ed. A. Richardson and T. Uebel, 250–277. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Opposition to Verstehen in Orthodox Logical Empiricism. In Historical Perspectives on Erklären and Verstehen, ed. U. Feest, 291–309. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Carnap, Philosophy, and ‘Politics in its Broadest Sense’. In Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism, ed. R. Creath, 133–148. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Neurath on Verstehen. European Journal of Philosophy 27 (4): 912–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wick, Warner A. 1951. The ‘Political’ Philosophy of Logical Empiricism. Philosophical Studies 2 (4): 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper and volume were supported by the MTA BTK Lendület Morals and Science Research Group, by the MTA Lendület Values and Science Research Group, and by the MTA Premium Postdoctoral research scholarship. The work and discussion of the contributors and referees of the papers are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Philosophy, Research Centre for the Humanities, Budapest, Hungary

    Adam Tamas Tuboly

  2. ITD, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary

    Adam Tamas Tuboly

Authors
  1. Adam Tamas Tuboly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute Vienna Circle, University of Vienna, Wien, Wien, Austria

    Christian Damböck

  2. Institute of Philosophy, Research Centre for the Humanities, Budapest, Hungary

    Adam Tamas Tuboly

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tuboly, A.T. (2022). Introduction: The Socio-ethical Concern of Logical Empiricism. In: Damböck, C., Tuboly, A.T. (eds) The Socio-Ethical Dimension of Knowledge. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80363-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation