Skip to main content

Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Liver Tumors in Computed Tomography Images: Methods and Limitations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computing

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 285))

  • 1609 Accesses

Abstract

Liver tumor segmentation in computed tomography images is considered a difficult task, especially for highly diverse datasets. This is demonstrated by top-ranking results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Challenge (LiTS) achieving ~70% dice. To improve upon these results, it is important to identify sources of limitations. In this work, we developed a tumor segmentation method following automatic liver segmentation and conducted a detailed limitation analysis study. Using LiTS dataset, tumor segmentation results performed comparable to state-of-the-art literature, achieving overall dice of 71%. Tumor detection accuracy reached ~83%. We have found that segmentation’s upper limit dice can reach ~77% if all false-positives were removed. Grouping by tumor sizes, larger tumors tend to have better segmentation, reaching a maximum approximated dice limit of 82.29% for tumors greater than 20,000 voxels. Medium and small tumor groups had an upper dice limit of 78.75% and 63.52% respectively. The tumor dice for true-positives was comparable for ideal (manual) vs. automatically segmented liver, reflecting a well-trained organ segmentation. We conclude that the segmentation of very small tumors with size values < 100 voxels is especially challenging where the system can be hyper-sensitive to consider local noise artifacts as possible tumors. The results of this work provide better insight about segmentation system limitations to enable for better false-positive removal development strategies. Removing suspected tumor regions less than 100 voxels eliminates ~80% of the total false-positives and therefore, may be an important step for clinical application of automated liver tumor detection and segmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Salman, O.S., Klein, R.: Developing an automatic cooperating neural networks and image standardization approach for segmentation of X-ray computed tomography images. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) FTC 2020. AISC, vol. 1288, pp. 390–401. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63128-4_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Salman, O.S., Klein, R.: Anatomical region identification in medical X-ray computed tomography (CT) scans: development and comparison of alternative data analysis and vision-based methods. Neural Comput. Appl. 32(23), 17519–17531 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04923-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, L., et al.: Liver tumor segmentation in CT volumes using an adversarial densely connected network. BMC Bioinf. 20(16), 587 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3069-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bilic, P., et al.: The liver tumor segmentation benchmark (LiTS). arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.04056 (2019)

  5. Chlebus, G., Schenk, A., Moltz, J., van Ginneken, B., Hahn, H., Meine, H.: Automatic liver tumor segmentation in CT with fully convolutional neural networks and object-based postprocessing. Sci Rep. 8(1), 1–7 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bi, L., Kim, J., Kumar, A., Feng, D.: Automatic liver lesion detection using cascaded deep residual networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.02703 (2017)

  8. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, W., Jia, F., Hu, Q.: Automatic segmentation of liver tumor in CT images with deep convolutional neural networks. J. Comput. Commun. 3(11), 146 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schapire, R.E.: Explaining AdaBoost. In: Schölkopf, B., Luo, Z., Vovk, V. (eds.) Empirical Inference, pp. 37–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41136-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Liaw, A., Wiener, M.: Classification and regression by RandomForest. R News, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 18–22 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Noble, W.: What is a support vector machine? Nat. Biotechnol. 24(12), 1565–1567 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidhuber, J.: Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw. 61, 85–117 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meng, L., Tian, Y., Bu, S.: Liver tumor segmentation based on 3D convolutional neural network with dual scale. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 21(1), 144–157 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.: Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng, S., Fang, B., Li, L., Gao, M., Wang, Y., Peng, K.: Automatic liver tumour segmentation in CT combining FCN and NMF-based deformable model. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis. 8(5), 1–10 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Image and video denoising by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering: block-matching and 3D filtering (BM3D) algorithm and its extensions. Tampere University of Technology (2020). http://www.cs.tut.fi/~foi/GCF-BM3D/. Accessed 9 Aug 2020

  18. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3431–3440 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. McInerney, T., Terzopoulos, D.: Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey. Med. Image Anal. 1(2), 91–108 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. IRCAD France (2020). https://www.ircad.fr/research/3d-ircadb-01/. Accessed 9 Aug 2020

  21. Christ, P.F., et al.: Automatic liver and lesion segmentation in CT using cascaded fully convolutional neural networks and 3D conditional random fields. In: Ourselin, S., Joskowicz, L., Sabuncu, M.R., Unal, G., Wells, W. (eds.) MICCAI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9901, pp. 415–423. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Odai S. Salman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Salman, O.S., Klein, R. (2021). Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Liver Tumors in Computed Tomography Images: Methods and Limitations. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Computing. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 285. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80129-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics