Abstract
Curriculum design plays an important role in creating environments that promote student engagement and learning gain. The curriculum, including the intentional scaffolding of knowledge and skills acquisition, inclusive approaches, clarity of learning outcomes, development of assessment literacy, authentic, engaging assessment tasks, work-integrated learning, options for the development of twenty-first century skills, embedded active and collaborative engagement and flexible delivery are all essential aspects of achieving positive learning outcomes. The chapter presents a case study of an Australian university that introduced a new way of offering subjects to students now known as Block delivery. The chapter outlines the rationale of this pedagogical approach, the principles of the Block curriculum and the learning and retention outcomes achieved in its first year of offer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Government Department of Education. (2017). 2016 Appendix 4 – Attrition, success and retention. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/documents/2016-appendix-4-attrition-success-and-retention
Australian Government Department of Education. (2018). Attrition, retention and success rate for commencing students. Retrieved from https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYWM2NjRkYTktZGJkNC00MGVkLWJlYjItMGRjNTc3Y2FkNmVkIiwidCI6ImRkMGNmZDE1LTQ1NTgtNGIxMi04YmFkLWVhMjY5ODRmYzQxNyJ9
Brett, M., & Harvey, A. (2017). Advancing equity in the Australian higher education system. In R. James, S. French, & P. Kelly (Eds.), Visions for Australian tertiary education (pp. 77–89). Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–363.
Burton, S., & Nesbit, P. L. (2008). Block or traditional? An analysis of student choice of teaching format. Journal of Management and Organization, 14(1), 4–19.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. The Wingspread Journal, 9, 1–10.
Colorado College. (n.d.). The Block Plan. Retrieved from https://www.coloradocollege.edu/basics/blockplan/
Crosling, G., Heagney, M., & Thomas, L. (2009). Improving retention in higher education: Improving teaching and learning. Australian Universities Review, 51(2), 9–18.
Ellis, B., & Sawyer, J. (2009). Regional summer schools: Widening learning opportunities through intensive courses. Education in Rural Australia, 19(1), 35–62.
Funston, A., Gil, M., & Gilmore, G. (Eds.). (2014). Strong starts, supported transitions and student success. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimensions of quality. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/dimensions_of_quality.pdf
Gil, M. (2014). Approaches to retention: An antipodean perspective. In A. Funston, M. Gil, & G. Gilmore (Eds.), Strong starts, supported transitions and student success (pp. 31–65). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Harvey, M., Power, M., & Wilson, M. (2017). A review of intensive mode of delivery and science subjects in Australian universities. Journal of Biological Education, 51(3), 315–325.
Higher Education Standards Panel. (2017). Final Report: Improving retention, completion and success in higher education. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/final_report_for_publishing.pdf
Ho, H., & Polonsky, M. (2009). Exploring marketing students’ attitudes and performance: A comparison of traditional and intensive delivery. Marketing Education Review, 19(3), 41–47.
Johnson, D. K. N., Lybecker, K. M., & Taylor, C. H. (2011). Retention of economics principles by undergraduates on alternative curricular structures. Journal of Education for Business, 86(6), 332–338.
Karaksha, A., Anoopkumar-Dukie, S., Grant, G., Davey, A., Nirthanan, N., Arora, D., … McDermott, C. (2013). Benefits of intensive mode teaching to improve student performance. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2013) Proceedings, Saville, Spain.
Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first-year student learning experience in Australian higher education. Retrieved from http://transitionpedagogy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Kift-Sally-ALTC-Senior-Fellowship-Report-Sep-091.pdf
Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/resources/high-impact-practices
Larsen, A., Horvath, D., & Bridge, C. (2019). ‘Get Ready’: Improving the transition experience of a diverse first-year cohort through building student agency. Student Success, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v11i3.1144
Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585
Male, S., Hancock, P., Leggoe, J., MacNish, C., Crispin, S., Ranmutugala, D., & Alam, F. (2016). Intensive mode teaching guide. Retrieved from www.uwa.edu.au/imt
McCluskey, T., Smallridge, A., Weldon, J., Loton, D., Samarawickrema, G., & Cleary, K. (2020). Building on the VU Block foundations: Results from the inaugural first-year cohort. Research and Development in Higher Education, 42, 61–72. https://www.herdsa.org.au/publications/conference-proceedings/research-and-development-higher-education-next-generation-6
McCluskey, T., Weldon, J., & Smallridge, A. (2019). Rebuilding the first-year experience, one block at a time. Student Success, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i1.1048
Oliver, R., Vanderford, S., & Grote, E. (2012). Evidence of English language proficiency and academic achievement of non-English-speaking background students. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 541–555.
Othman, A. (2016). A comprehensive review of the major studies and theoretical models of student retention in higher education. Higher Education Studies, 6(2), 1–18.
Quest University. (n.d.). The Block Plan. Retrieved from https://questu.ca/academics/the-block-plan/
Ramsay, I. (2011). Intensive teaching in law subjects. The Law Teacher, 45(1), 87–100.
Roberts, J. (2018). Professional staff contributions to student retention and success in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2018.1428409
Schuetze, H. G., & Slowey, M. (2002). Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis of non-traditional students and lifelong learners in higher education. Higher Education, 44, 309–327.
Smallridge, A. (2019). First-year college – Report to Academic Board. Victoria University.
Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2017). Characteristics of Australian higher education providers and their relation to first-year student attrition. Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.
Tinto, V. (2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–256.
van der Meer, J., Scott, S., & Pratt, K. (2018). First semester academic performance: The importance of early indicators of non-engagement. Student Success, 9(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v9i4.652
Victoria University. (2018, August 22). VU’s Block model a winner with students. Retrieved from https://www.vu.edu.au/about-vu/news-events/news/vu-s-block-model-a-winner-with-students
Victoria University. (2019). The VU way: Engaged learning in Block mode. Melbourne. Retrieved from https://www.vu.edu.au/sites/default/files/the-vu-way.pdf
Wenger, E. (2009). A social theory of learning. In Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 217–240). Routledge.
Whillier, S., & Lystad, R. P. (2013). Intensive mode delivery of a neuroanatomy unit: Lower final grades but higher student satisfaction. Anatomical Sciences Education, 6, 286–293.
Willans, J., & Seary, K. (2018). Why did we lose them and what could we have done? Student Success, 9(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v9i1.432
Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2008). The first-year experience of higher education in the UK. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/fyefinalreport_0.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCluskey, T., Samarawickrema, G., Smallridge, A., Dempsey, N. (2021). Re-designing Curriculum to Enhance First-Year Student Success: A Case Study. In: Shah, M., Kift, S., Thomas, L. (eds) Student Retention and Success in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80045-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80045-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80044-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80045-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)