Abstract
Frequent cycling is environment-sparing and health-promoting. Therefore, bicycle-use for commuting should be increased by developing infrastructure according to cyclists’ demands. Using a mixed-method approach, we first identified cyclist types by stated preferences regarding cycling infrastructure. Two types of commuters could be distinguished: foremost fast and safe and fast cyclists.
Second, the cyclists rated their last commuter trip as well as alternatives to their chosen route based on the dimensions safety, comfort, and efficiency. Contrary to expectations, the evaluation of routes chosen and avoided alternatives found no differences between these cyclist types – both types made similar decisions. The dimension of efficiency turned out to be most relevant to the route choice decision making of both groups of commuting bicyclists.
When cycling is not a leisure activity but serves commuting, this should be reflected in infrastructure with fast cycling and short cycling routes, for increased efficiency is of relevance to all types of commuting cyclists.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Buehler, R., Pucher, J.: Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transp. (Amst) 39, 409–432 (2012)
Dill, J., Carr, T.: Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them. Transp. Res. Rec. 1828, 116–123 (2003)
Dill, J., McNeil, N.: Four types of cyclists? Transp. Res. Rec. 2387, 129–138 (2013)
Geller, R.: Four types of cyclists. Portl. Bur. Transp. 1–9 (2006)
Damant-Sirois, G., Grimsrud, M., El-Geneidy, A.M.: What’s your type: a multidimensional cyclist typology. Transportation (Amst). 41, 1153–1169 (2014)
Betsch, T., Funke, J.; Plessner, H.: Einführung in die Psychologie des Urteilens, Entscheidens und Problemlösens. In: Denken–Urteilen, Entscheiden, Problemlösen, pp 1–7. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Heller, O.: Theorie und Praxis des Verfahrens der Kategorienunterteilung (KU). In: Forschungsbericht 1981, Heller, pp. 1–15. Würzburger Psychologisches Institut, Würzburg (1982)
Stinson, M.A., Bhat, C.R.: Analysis using a stated preference survey. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 1828, 107–115 (2003)
Heinen, E., van Wee, B., Maat, K.: Commuting by bicycle: an overview of the literature. Transp. Rev. 30, 59–96 (2010)
Caulfield, B., Brick, E., McCarthy, O.T.: Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences - a case study of Dublin. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 17, 413–417 (2012)
Acknowledgment
Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - 227198829/GRK1931. Special thanks for her support go to Susann Winkler.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Grüner, S., Vollrath, M. (2021). Reaching Your Destination on Time - Route Choice Decisions of Different Commuter Cyclist Types. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 270. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80012-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80012-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80011-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80012-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)