Skip to main content

Metaphysical Religion and Spirituality: A Measured Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Metaphysical Religion in America

Abstract

The era where the American religious landscape could be accurately described by Will Herberg as Protestant, Catholic, Jew has given way to a period where denominational identity matters less and those claiming no religious preference represent between 15% and 23% of the population, depending on the survey [1–4]. Yet, these same surveys suggest that Americans also continue to report high levels of belief in God. Furthermore, few of those who have no formal affiliation can be accurately described as atheist or agnostic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, the Gallup survey, which does not explicitly suggest ‘no religion’ to respondents as a possible answer, reports a significantly lower percentage of nones than other surveys do.

  2. 2.

    https://nsrn.net/2017/11/24/whither-the-paranormal-in-secular-studies/

  3. 3.

    http://www.yogajournal.com/uncategorized/new-study-finds-20-million-yogis-u-s/

  4. 4.

    One of the most difficult dilemmas for those interested in studying small religious groups is that the standard social scientific survey of religion relies on a sample of between 1500 and 3000 individuals. Assuming a random sampling procedure, this is generally sufficient for generating a sample that is representative for populations such as Protestants and Catholics. However, this often leaves us with only a handful of Jews, Muslims, Buddhists and even fewer neopagans and shamans. One of the reasons for relying on these small samples is cost: surveys are often conducted based on survey minutes and each additional respondent and each additional question comes with a cost. However, simply increasing the sample size will not solve the problem for difficult to identify groups, particularly those who would need to be targeted through more than a single screening question. One new technique being used to generate random samples of hidden populations is respondent driven sampling. This could prove useful in this case because loose networks appear to be important here, perhaps even more important than organizations

References

  1. Hout, Michael, and Claude S. Fischer. 2014. Explaining why more Americans have no religious preference: Political backlash and generational succession, 1987-2012. Sociological Science 1: 423–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lim, Chaeyoon, Carol Ann MacGregor, and Robert Putnam. 2011. Secular or liminal: Discovering heterogeneity among religious Nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49 (4): 596–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lipka, Michael. 2015. A closer look at America’s rapidly growing religious ‘Nones’. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/13/a-closer-look-at-americas-rapidly-growing-religious-nones/

  4. Wuthnow, Robert. 1990. The restructuring of American religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellah, Robert Neelly. 1985. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davie, Grace. 1994. Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without belonging. Oxford; Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fuller, Robert C. 2001. Spiritual, but not religious: Understanding unchurched America. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Greer, Bruce A., and Wade Clark Roof. 1992. Desperately seeking Sheila: Locating religious Privatism in American society. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 31: 346–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roof, Wade Clark. 1993. A generation of seekers: The spiritual journeys of the baby boom generation. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wuthnow, Robert. 2007. After the baby boomers: How twenty- and thirty-somethings are shaping the future of American religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. David Voas, 2009. The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe, European Sociological Review, 25(2): 155–168, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn044.

  12. ———. 2001. Spirituality and spiritual practice. In The Blackwell companion to sociology of religion, ed. Richard K. Fenn. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ammerman, Nancy. 2013. Spiritual but not religious? Beyond binary choices in the study of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (2): 258–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaves, Mark, and Shawna Anderson. 2012. Continuity and change in American religion, 1972-2008. PP. 212–239. In Social trends in American life: Findings from the general social survey since 1972, ed. Peter Marsden. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chaves, Mark. 2011. American religion: Contemporary trends. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Lipka, Michael and Claire Gecewicz. 2017. More Americans Now Say They’re Spiritual But Not Religious. Pew Research Center http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/06/more-americans-now-say-theyre-spiritual-but-not-religious/

  17. Kosmin, Barry A. and Ariela Keysar. 2013. Religious, spiritual and secular: The emergence of three distinct worldviews among American College students. A Report based on the ARIS 2013 National College Survey. Trinity College.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, Christian, and Patricia Snell. 2009. Soul searching: The religious and spiritual lives of American teenagers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Putnam, Robert, and David Campbell. 2010. American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bender, Courtney, Wendy Cadge, Peggy Levitt, and David Smilde. 2012. Religion on the edge: De-centering and re-centering the sociology of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Albanese, Catherine. 2007. A republic of mind and Spirit: A cultural history of American metaphysical religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meyer, Donald. 1980. The positive thinkers. New York: Pantehnon.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bender, Courtney. 2010. The new metaphysicals: Spirituality and the American religious imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Fraser, Caroline. 2000. God’s perfect child: Living and dying in the Christian science church. New York: Picadour.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt, Leigh. 2005. Restless souls: The making of American spirituality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Altglas, Veronique. 2014. From yoga to kabbalah: Religious exoticism and the logics of bricolage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. McGee, Micki. 2005. Self-Help, Inc.: Makeover culture in American life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Bain, Read. 1927. Religious attitudes of college students. American Journal of Sociology 32 (5): 762–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Drake, Durant. 1919. Seekers after God. The Harvard Theological Review 12 (1): 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roof, Wade Clark, and Jennifer L. Roof. 1984. Review of the polls: Images of god among Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 23 (2): 201–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Baker, Joseph O., and Christopher D. Bader. 2014. A social anthropology of ghosts in twenty-first century America. Social Compass 61 (4): 569–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bader, Christopher D., F. Carson Mencken and Joseph Baker. October, 2010. Paranormal America: Ghost encounters, UFO sightings, Bigfoot hunts and other Curiosities in Religion and Culture. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Clarke, Tainya C., Lindsay I. Black, Barbara J. Stussman, Patricia M. Barnes, and Richard L. Nahin. 2015. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002-2012. National Health Statistics Reports 79: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jain, Andrea. 2014. Selling yoga: From counterculture to pop culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Ammerman, Nancy. 2014. Finding religion in everyday life. Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review 75 (2): 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koenig, Harold G. 2008. Concerns about measuring ‘spirituality’ in research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 196 (5): 349–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wuthnow, Robert. 1998. After heaven: Spirituality in America since the 1950s. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Hall, David. 1997. Lived religion in America: Toward a history of practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Keysar, Ariela. 2014. Shifts along the American religious-secular Spectrum. Secularism & Nonreligion 3 (1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Oakes, Kaya. 2015. Belonging without believing. CrossCurrents 65 (2): 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Day, A. 2011. Believing in belonging: Belief and social identity in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Swidler, Ann. 1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review 51 (1): 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chaves, Mark, and James C. Cavendish. 1994. More evidence on U.S. Catholic Church attendance. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 33 (4): 376–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hout, Michael A., and Andrew M. Greeley. 1987. The Center doesn’t hold: Church attendance in the United States, 1940–1984. American Sociological Review 63 (1): 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Smith, Tom W. 1998. A review of church attendance measures. American Sociological Review 63 (1): 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cox, Daniel, Robert P. Jones, and Juhem Navarro-Rivera. 2014. I know what you did last Sunday: Measuring social desirability bias in self-reported religious behavior, belief and identity. Public Religion Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Goldman, Marion. 2012. The American social rush: Esalen and the rise of spiritual privilege. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Hastings, Orestes P. 2016. Not a lonely crowd? Social connectedness, religious service attendance, and the spiritual but not religious. Social Science Research 57: 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Ann MacGregor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

MacGregor, C.A. (2022). Metaphysical Religion and Spirituality: A Measured Approach. In: Silk, M., White, C. (eds) The Future of Metaphysical Religion in America. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79903-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics