Skip to main content

Effective Advanced Warning for Connected Safety Applications - Supplementing Automated Driving Systems for Improved Vehicle Reaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Road Infrastructure and Mobility (IRF 2021)

Abstract

Given the rapid pace of modern technological advancements, the public should expect and demand measurable improvements to highway safety. Yet, it is not so clear how much improvement may be anticipated. Government organizations such as the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) have already spent decades and millions of dollars researching proper markings, alerting systems, and safety distances to help reduce collisions and other incidents on public roadways. While clearly this effort has had great impact, there are limiting factors that continually constrain the ability of traditional methods to significantly reduce the number of collisions. Such factors include driver behavior aspects such as reaction time, sudden maneuvers, and traffic violations, plus infrastructure aspects such as malfunctioning signals, inadequate signage, and non-standard road design. As increased numbers of connected and automated vehicles (CAV) are introduced into the traffic stream, and advanced safety applications are continually improving, the industry envisions a major decline in incidents across the board. This paper details the limiting factors to why a sizable reduction of incidents is not possible with conventional resources and introduces the framework for adding advanced warnings into connected safety applications in existing vehicles, such as red-light violation warning (RLVW), to achieve measurable results. Further, the paper then applies this same model for use within automated driving systems (ADS). More than just a technological examination, this paper also predicts the expected impact to roadway incidents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgardner, G., Hoekstra-Atwood, L., Prendez, D.M.: Concepts of connected vehicle applications: interface lessons learned from a rail crossing implementation. In: AutomotiveUI ‘20: 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 280–290. ACM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.L., Richard, C., Brown, J.L., McCallum, M.: Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Highway Administration: Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Rail Administration: 3.01 - Accident Trends - Summary Statistics. Retrieved from Office of Safety Analysis. https://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/publicsite/summary.aspx

  • Federal Railway Administration: 1.12 - Ten Year Accident/Incident Overview. Retrieved from Office of Safety Analysis. https://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety/publicsite/summary.aspx

  • Gazis, D., Herman, R., Maradudin, A.A.: The problem of the amber signal light in traffic flow. Oper. Res. 8, 112–132 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jahangiri, A., Rakha, H., Dingus, T.A.: Red-light running violation prediction using observation and simulator data. Accid. Anal. Prev. 316–328 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Järlström, M.: An Extended Kinematic Equation, Beaverton, Oregon, USA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, G., Rumar, K.: Driver’s brake reaction times. Human Factors 13(1), 23–27 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, J., Amine, K., Abi Saad, R.:, An initial investigation of the effects of a fully automated vehicle fleet on geometric design. J. Adv. Transp. 1–10 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Report of the Massachusetts Highway Accident Survey. CWA and ERA Project, Cambridge, MA (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Cooperative Highway Research Program: NCHRP Report 400: Determination of Stopping Sight Distance. National Academy of Sciences, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Cooperative Highway Research Program: NCHRP Report 731: Guidelines for Timing Yellow and All-Red Intervals at Signalized Intersections. National Academy of Sciences, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, O.: Braking distances of vehicles from high speeds. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, pp. 421–436. Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C. (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, Z., et al.: Evaluation of cell phone induced driver behavior at a type II dilemma zone. Cogent Eng. 5(1) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • The Human Factors and Statistical Modeling Lab: 2014 TRB Data Contest. Seattle, WA (2013). https://depts.washington.edu/hfsm/upload.php. Accessed 13 July (2021)

  • Tian, J., Gao, M., Lu, E.: Dynamic collision avoidance path planning for mobile robot based on multi-sensor data fusion by support vector machine. In: 2007 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 2779–2783. IEEE, Harbin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmson, C.: Driving beyond stopping distance constraints. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1189–1194. IEEE, Beijing (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank my partner authors for all the time and effort they put into this study. In particular, I express my deepest thanks for the great research done by Varshini. We thank her graduate school, the University of Wisconsin, for training her well, and our colleagues, especially Dr. Alex Noble and Martha Eddy, who made this work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory M. Baumgardner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Baumgardner, G.M., Boyapati, R.K., Kamaraj, A.V. (2022). Effective Advanced Warning for Connected Safety Applications - Supplementing Automated Driving Systems for Improved Vehicle Reaction. In: Akhnoukh, A., et al. Advances in Road Infrastructure and Mobility. IRF 2021. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79801-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics