Skip to main content

Comparing the Sensitivity of Workload Measures for Different Task Types Using Nuclear Power Plant Main Control Room Simulators

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Simulation and Digital Human Modeling (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 264))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1143 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents the analyses of data collected from four previous studies to compare the sensitivity of multiple physiological and subjective workload measures in detecting the workload changes induced by common nuclear power plant (NPP) main control room tasks in three types using three simulators. Analyses of effect sizes were used to quantify the magnitude of response or rating changes in the workload metrics. The results suggest that the majority of the workload measures utilized in the Human Performance Test Facility (HPTF) studies show practically relevant sensitivity to the workload changes induced by the experimental manipulations in the simulated NPP operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reinerman-Jones, L., Lin, J., Barber, D., Matthews, G., Hughes, N.: Human Performance Test Facility Experiment 4: Former Operator Workload and Performance Comparison between Two Simulated Environments, U.S. NRC, Washington, DC (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. O’Hara, J., Higgins, J., Fleger, S., Pieringer, P.: Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (NUREG-0711, Rev.3). U.S. NRC, Washington, DC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hancock, P., Matthews, G.: Workload and performance: associations, insensitivities, and dissociations. Hum. Factors 61, 374–392 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hart, S., Staveland, L.: Development of NASA-TLX: results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Advances in Psychology, pp. 139–183. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boles, D., Adair, L.: The MRQ. HFES Ann. Meet. 45(25), 1790–1794 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matthews, G., et al.: Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion 2, 315–340 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reinerman-Jones, L., Lin, J., Barber, D., Matthews, G., Hughes, N.: Multi-dimensional workload in two types of NPP simulators. HFES Ann. Meet. 63(1), 1777–1781 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence, Hillsdale (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Warm, J., Parasuraman, R., Matthews, G.: Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Hum. Factors 50, 433–441 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Veltman, J., Gaillard, A.: Physiological indices of workload in a simulated flight task. Biol. Psych. 42(3), 323–342 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hankins, T., Wilson, G.: A comparison of heart rate, eye activity, EEG and subjective measures of pilot mental workload during flight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 69(4), 360–367 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson, G.: Applied use of cardiac and respiration measures: practical considerations and precautions. Biol. Psych. 34(2), 163–178 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorna, P.G.A.M.: Spectral analysis of heart rate and psychological state: a review of its validity as a workload index. Biol. Psych. 34(2), 237–257 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinchao Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lin, J., Matthews, G., Barber, D., Hughes, N. (2021). Comparing the Sensitivity of Workload Measures for Different Task Types Using Nuclear Power Plant Main Control Room Simulators. In: Wright, J.L., Barber, D., Scataglini, S., Rajulu, S.L. (eds) Advances in Simulation and Digital Human Modeling. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 264. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79763-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics