Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysing Discourse Coherence in Students’ L2 Writing: Rhetorical Structure and the Use of Connectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Advanced English Language Competence

Part of the book series: English Language Education ((ELED,volume 22))

  • 791 Accesses

Abstract

Studies of coherence and cohesion in learner writing report divergent results regarding the relationship between the two. What seems to be missing is an analytical level that allows for the investigation of the specific role that cohesive elements at the textual surface level play in the coherence structure of learner texts. To address this problem, a corpus of 30 argumentative essays written by first-year students of English at the University of Vienna is subjected to a multi-perspective analysis, including (1) global coherence ratings, (2) the description of the coherence structure, and (3) the analysis of connectives used. This chapter shows that the way coherence relations are signalled differs between coherent and less coherent (or incoherent) texts. It is found that there is a qualitative difference with regard to the types of connectives used, which can be related to their function in the discourse structure. The study also reveals that the amount of signalling varies between different types of relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abelen, E., Redeker, G., & Thompson, S. A. (1993). The rhetorical structure of US-American and Dutch fund-raising letters. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal of the Study of Discourse, 13(3), 323–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altenberg, B., & Tapper, M. (1998). The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 80–93). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bublitz, W. (1999). Introduction: Views of coherence. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk, & E. Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse. How to create it and how to describe it. Selected papers from the international workshop on coherence, Augsburg, 24–27 April 1997 (pp. 1–10). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung. (2019). Assessment scale B2. Retrieved from https://www.matura.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/Begleitmaterial/LFS/srdp_lfs_assessment_scale_b2.pdf

  • Cain, K., & Nash, H. M. (2011). The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for English Language Teaching. (2007-). Database of English Learner Texts (DELT). Retrieved from https://celt.univie.ac.at/home/delt

  • Chen, C. W. (2006). The use of conjunctive adverbials in the academic papers of advanced Taiwanese EFL learners. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.11.1.05che

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, S. A., Kyle, C., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degand, L. (1998). On classifying connectives and coherence relations. In M. Stede, L. Wanner, & E. Hovy (Eds.), Proceedings of COLING-ACL workshop on discourse relations and discourse markers (pp. 29–35).

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Y., & Yip, L. M. O. (1992). A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English. RELC Journal, 23(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829202300102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. (2014). Signalling coherence in Austrian students’ seminar papers. Macro- and micro-structural cues. In H. Gruber & G. Redeker (Eds.), The pragmatics of discourse coherence: Theories and applications (pp. 267–291). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, C. (1995). The notion of coherence in discourse. In G. Rickheit & C. Habel (Eds.), Focus and coherence in discourse processing (pp. 190–202). de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel, E. (2001). Matters of cohesion in L2 academic texts. Applied Language Learning, 12(2), 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafarpur, A. (1991). Cohesiveness as a basis for evaluating compositions. System, 19(4), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(91)90026-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 33(4), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1987). Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization. Information Sciences Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3), 243–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, J., & Tsang, E. S. C. (1993). A corpus-based study of logical connectors in EFL students’ writing: Directions for future research. In R. Pemberton & E. S. C. Tsang (Eds.), Studies in lexis (pp. 215–246). The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, M. (2003). RST tool – An RST markup tool. (Version 3.41) [computer software]. WagSoft Linguistic Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic English. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, T., & Noordman, L. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29, 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2901_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, T., Land, J., & Mulder, G. (2007). Linguistic markers of coherence improve text comprehension in functional contexts. Information Design Journal, 15(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.3.04san

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiftner, B. (2017). An integrative approach to discourse coherence: Rhetorical structure and cohesion in university students’ English L2 writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Vienna, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, M. (2009). A corpus-based study of adverbial connectors in learner text. MSU Working Papers in SLS, 1(1), 1–13. Retrieved from http://sls.msu.edu/soslap/journal/index.php/sls/article/view/4/2

  • Soria, C., & Ferrari, G. (1998). Lexical marking of discourse relations – Some experimental findings. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL workshop on discourse relations and discourse markers (pp. 36–42).

    Google Scholar 

  • Speyer, A., & Fetzer, A. (2014). The coding of discourse relations in English and German argumentative discourse. In H. Gruber & G. Redeker (Eds.), The pragmatics of discourse coherence: Theories and applications (pp. 87–119). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, A. (Ed.). (2010). Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t140.e0978610

  • Taboada, M. (2009). Implicit and explicit coherence relations. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course. An overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 127–143). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taboada, M., & Mann, W. C. (2006). Rhetorical structure theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies, 8(3), 423–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tankó, G. (2004). The use of adverbial connectors in Hungarian university students’ argumentative essays. In J. M. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp. 157–181). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, M. (2005). Connectives in advanced Swedish EFL learners’ written English – Preliminary results. The Department of English: Working papers in English linguistics (Lund University), 5, 115–144. Retrieved from http://www.sol.lu.se/fileadmin/media/forskning/workingpapers/engelska/vol05/Tapper-wp-05.pdf

  • Van der Vliet, N., & Redeker, G. (2014). Explicit and implicit coherence relations in Dutch texts. In H. Gruber & G. Redeker (Eds.), The pragmatics of discourse coherence: Theories and applications (pp. 23–52). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC Journal, 3(1), 61–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820003100104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English and American Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Barbara Schiftner-Tengg

Authors
  1. Barbara Schiftner-Tengg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Schiftner-Tengg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English and American Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Armin Berger

  2. Department of English and American Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Helen Heaney

  3. University College of Teacher Education, Vienna, Austria

    Pia Resnik

  4. Department of English and American Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Angelika Rieder-Bünemann

  5. Department of English and American Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Galina Savukova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schiftner-Tengg, B. (2021). Analysing Discourse Coherence in Students’ L2 Writing: Rhetorical Structure and the Use of Connectives. In: Berger, A., Heaney, H., Resnik, P., Rieder-Bünemann, A., Savukova, G. (eds) Developing Advanced English Language Competence. English Language Education, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79241-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79241-1_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79240-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79241-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation