Skip to main content

A New Method for Estimation of Staircase Evacuation Time in High Rise Buildings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Environment Engineering and Management

Abstract

As cities become more modern and complex, safe building evacuation within the stipulated time during an emergency is one of the major challenges for building designers, building occupants and the government. The most important requirement is to achieve evacuation before tenability is reached, i.e. the RSET (Required Safe Evacuation time) should be less than the ASET (Available Safe Evacuation time). Generally, various evacuation components like staircases, evacuation elevators, sky bridges, fire escape chutes, and controlled lowering devices are available along with evacuation strategies like total evacuation, phased evacuation, stay in placed evacuation and delayed evacuation. However, total building evacuation using the staircase is the most accepted, safe and traditional method of evacuation due to the unexpected behavior of fire and occupants [1,2,3]. Additionally, to decide on the geometry of the staircase, it is very important to know the required time to evacuate the building, so that the evacuation strategy can be decided. The evacuation time depends on important building parameters like staircase width, the height of the building and the number of occupants. Studies made by Galbreath [4] and Pauls [5] have suggested a relationship between the rates of discharge, the flow of occupants, and occupant density for the calculation of evacuation time. They have suggested two different relationships for two different flows, i.e. free flow and congested flow at the stairs. In this paper, one hundred and twenty building models are studied with different parameters like width of the stairs, occupant load, number of the floors and area of floor with two main objectives. The first objective is to study the impact of various building parameters on the overall building evacuation process, and the second objective is to suggest a single relationship with all parameters considered, which can be applied to calculate evacuation time and to further decide the width of the staircase and the maximum allowed occupants load.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ding N., Zhang H., Chen, T., & Luh, P. B. (2015). Stair evacuation simulations based on cellular automata considering evacuees’ walk preferences. Chinese Physics B, 24(6), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salankar, S., Tauseef, S. M., & Sharma, R. K. (2018). Need for better high rise building evacuation practices.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ding N., Chen T., Zhang H., & Luh P. B. (2015). Traffic and Granular Flow ’13. Traffic and Granular Flow ’13, October 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Galbreath, M. (1969). Time of evacuation by stairs in high buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pauls J. (1987). Calculating evacuation times for tall buildings. Fire Safety Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  6. https://www.statista.com

  7. Challinger D. (2008). From the Ground up: Security for Tall Buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shultz J. M., Marcelin L. H., Espinel Z., Madanes S. B., Allen A., & Neria Y. (2013). Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards (Vol. 2).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Craighead G. (2003). High-rise Security and Fire Life Safety.

    Google Scholar 

  10. NFPA 101 ® Life Safety Code®. (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. International Code Council. (2018). 2018 International Building Code. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kavilkar R., & Patil S. (2014). Study of High Rise Residential Buildings in Indian Cities (A Case Study –Pune City). International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(1), 86–90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kealy M. J., Ceng, H., & Mcibse, F. (2008). Fire Engineering Super tall: A New Approach to Escape, Schirmer Engineering Corporation, Conference proceeding paper.

    Google Scholar 

  14. PelechanoN., & Malkawi A. (2008). Evacuation simulation models: Challenges in modeling high rise building evacuation with cellular automata approaches. Automation in Construction, 17(4)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ma, J., Song, W. G., Tian, W., Lo, S. M., & Liao, G. X. (2012). Experimental study on an ultra high-rise building evacuation in China. Safety Science, 50(8), 1665–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.018

  16. Cepolina E. M. (2009). Phased evacuation: An optimisation model which takes into account the capacity drop phenomenon in pedestrian flows. Fire Safety Journal, 44(4), 532–544.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gwynne S. M. V., Kuligowsk E. D., Kratchma J., & Milk, J. A. (2009). Questioning the linear relationship between doorway width and achievable flow rate. Fire Safety Journal, 44(1), 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  18. DaamenW.,& Hoogendoorn S. P. (2011). Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang J., Song, W., & Xu, X. (2008). Experiment and multi-grid modeling of evacuation from a classroom. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 387(23), 5901–5909.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frey, B. S., Savage, D. A., &Torgler, B. (2011). Erratum: Interaction of natural survival instincts and internalized social norms exploring the Titanic and Lusitania disasters (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2010) 107, 11, (4862–4865)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leonard cooper, David Stroup, (1982), Calculating available safe egress time (ASET) – A computer program and user’s guide, US department of commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sime J. D. (1986). Perceived Time Available: the Margin of Safety in Fires. 561–570.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin C. S., & Wu, M. E. (2018). A study of evaluating an evacuation time. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kodu, V. K. R., &Harmathy, T. Z. (2016). Properties of building materials. In SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Fifth Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang G., Huang, D., Zhu, G., & Yuan, G. (2017). Probabilistic model for safe evacuation under the effect of uncertain factors in fire. Safety Science, 93, 222–229.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gwynne S., Galea, E. R., Lawrence, P. J., & Filippidis L. (2001). Modelling occupant interaction with fire conditions using the buildingEXODUS evacuation model. Fire Safety Journal, 36(4), 327–357.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao C. M., Lo, S. M., Zhang, S. P., & Liu, M. (2009). A post-fire survey on the pre-evacuation human behavior. Fire Technology, 45(1), 71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shields, T. J., & Boyce, K. E. (2000). Study of evacuation from large retail stores. Fire Safety Journal, 35(1), 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, M., & Lo, S. M. (2011). The quantitative investigation on people’s pre-evacuation behavior under fire. Automation in Construction, 20(5), 620–628.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Proulx, G. (1995). Evacuation time and movement in apartment buildings. Fire Safety Journal, 24(3), 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brennan, P. (1997). Timing Human Response In Real Fires. Fire Safety Science, 5, 807–818.

    Google Scholar 

  32. National Building Code of India -2016 VOL 1.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Building Regulations 2010 B1 Means of warning and escape B2 Internal fire spread (linings) B3 Internal fire spread (structure) B4 External fire spread B5 Access and facilities for the fire service. (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Post-war building studies fire grading of buildings part II firefighting equipment personal safety chimneys and flues part III,part IV by a joint committee of the building research board of the department of scientific & industrial research and of the fire offices’ committee London: I952 published for the ministry of works by Her Majesty’s Stationery office

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thompson, P. A., & Marchant, E. W. (1995). A computer model for the evacuation of large building populations. Fire Safety Journal, 24(2), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pauls, J. L., Fruin, J. J., &Zupan, J. M. Minimum Stair Width for Evacuation, Overtaking Movement and Counter flow Technical Bases and Suggestions for the Past, Present and Future Consulting Services in Building Use & Safety, USA 2 PED Associates, USA 3 Regional Plan Association, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sujatmiko, W., Dipojono, H. K., & Soelami, F. X. N. (2014). Performance-based Fire Safety Evacuation in High-rise Building Flats in Indonesia – A Case Study in Bandung. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thunderhead Engineering. (2011). Pathfinder User Manual. Springer Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Watson, R. (2001). Case Studies : Case Studies : Case Studies : Three-Dimensional Molded Interconnect Devices (3D-MID): Materials, Manufacturing, Assembly, and Applications for Injection Molded Circuit Carriers, 80(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  40. E., G., C., M., & P., B. (1999). Complex evacuation; effects of motivation level and slope of stairs on emergency egress time in a sports stadium. Safety Science, 31(2), 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Averill, J. D., &Kuligowski, E. D. (2014). NIST Technical Note 1624 Stairwell Evacuation from Buildings : What We Know We Don ’ t Know. December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Averill, J. D., Mileti, D. S., Peacock, R. D., Kuligowski, E. D., Groner, N., Proulx, G., Reneke, P. A., & Nelson, H. E. (2005). Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster: Occupant behavior, egress, and emergency communications. NistNcstar 1-7, 1–298.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pauls, J. L., Fruin, J. J., & Zupan, J. M. (2007). Minimum Stair Width for Evacuation, Overtaking Movement and Counter flow — Technical Bases and Suggestions for the Past, Present and Future. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2005, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Still, G. K. (2000). 2000_Still Thesis Crowd Dynamic.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pauls, J. (1984). The movement of people in buildings and design solutions for means of egress. Fire Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tavares, R. M., Tavares, J. M. L., & Parry-Jones, S. L. (2008). The use of a mathematical multi criteria decision-making model for selecting the fire origin room. Building and Environment, 43(12), 2090–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Name, M., Description, V. S., & References, T. (1995). Computer Models For Fire and Smoke. In Journal of Fire Protection Engineering (Vol. 3, Issue July, pp. 10–12).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Thornton, C., Konski, R. O., Hardeman, B., Swenson, D., Ave, P., &Ste, B. (2011). Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  49. MCGM. (1991). Development Control Regulations 1991. 1991(5), 1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kuligowski, E. D., & Peacock, R. D. (2005). A Review of Building Evacuation Models. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 156.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Galbreath M. A Survey of Exit facilities in high office buildings (1968). Building research note

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rivers, E., Jaynes, C., Kimball, A., & Morrow, E. (2014). Using case study data to validate 3d agent-based pedestrian simulation tool for building egress modeling. Transportation Research Procedia, 2, 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Salankar, S., Tauseef, S.M., Sharma, R.K. (2021). A New Method for Estimation of Staircase Evacuation Time in High Rise Buildings. In: Siddiqui, N.A., Bahukhandi, K.D., Tauseef, S.M., Koranga, N. (eds) Advances in Environment Engineering and Management. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79065-3_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics