Skip to main content

Natural Emergence of Heterogeneous Strategies in Artificially Intelligent Competitive Teams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Swarm Intelligence (ICSI 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12689))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Multi agent strategies in mixed cooperative-competitive environments can be hard to craft by hand because each agent needs to coordinate with its teammates while competing with its opponents. Learning based algorithms are appealing but they require a competitive opponent to train against, which is often not available. Many scenarios require heterogeneous agent behavior for the team’s success and this increases the complexity of the learning algorithm. In this work, we develop a mixed cooperative-competitive multi agent environment called FortAttack in which two teams compete against each other for success. We show that modeling agents with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and training them with Reinforcement Learning (RL) from scratch, leads to the co-evolution of increasingly complex strategies for each team. Through competition in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), we observe a natural emergence of heterogeneous behavior among homogeneous agents when such behavior can lead to the team’s success. Such heterogeneous behavior from homogeneous agents is appealing because any agent can replace the role of another agent at test time. Finally, we propose ensemble training, in which we utilize the evolved opponent strategies to train a single policy for friendly agents. We were able to train a large number of agents on a commodity laptop, which shows the scalability and efficiency of our approach. The code and a video presentation are available online (Code: https://github.com/Ankur-Deka/Emergent-Multiagent-Strategies, Video: https://youtu.be/ltHgKYc0F-E).

Supported by organization ONR N00014-19-C-1070, AFOSR/AFRL award FA9550-18-1-0251, Darpa DARPA Cooperative Agreement No.: HR00111820051 and AFOSR FA9550-15-1-0442.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agarwal, A., Kumar, S., Sycara, K.: Learning transferable cooperative behavior in multi-agent teams. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.01202 (2019)

  2. Al-Shedivat, M., Bansal, T., Burda, Y., Sutskever, I., Mordatch, I., Abbeel, P.: Continuous adaptation via meta-learning in nonstationary and competitive environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.03641 (2017)

  3. Baker, B., et al.: Emergent tool use from multi-agent autocurricula. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.07528 (2019)

  4. Brockman, G., et al.: Openai gym. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01540 (2016)

  5. Bu, L., Babu, R., De Schutter, B., et al.: A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 38(2), 156–172 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haarnoja, T., Zhou, A., Abbeel, P., Levine, S.: Soft actor-critic: off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.01290 (2018)

  7. Han, L., et al.: Grid-wise control for multi-agent reinforcement learning in video game ai. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2576–2585 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoshen, Y.: Vain: attentional multi-agent predictive modeling. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2701–2711 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lillicrap, T.P., et al.: Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971 (2015)

  10. Lowe, R., Wu, Y., Tamar, A., Harb, J., Abbeel, P., Mordatch, I.: Multi-agent actor-critic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. In: Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mnih, V., et al.: Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518(7540), 529–533 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramachandran, R.K., Preiss, J.A., Sukhatme, G.S.: Resilience by reconfiguration: Exploiting heterogeneity in robot teams. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.04856 (2019)

  13. Rashid, T., Samvelyan, M., De Witt, C.S., Farquhar, G., Foerster, J., Whiteson, S.: Qmix: monotonic value function factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11485 (2018)

  14. Samvelyan, M., et al .: The starcraft multi-agent challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.04043 (2019)

  15. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., Klimov, O.: Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 (2017)

  16. Shishika, D., Paulos, J., Kumar, V.: Cooperative team strategies for multi-player perimeter-defense games. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 5(2), 2738–2745 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Silver, D., et al.: Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. Nature 550(7676), 354–359 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sukhbaatar, S., Fergus, R., et al.: Learning multiagent communication with backpropagation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2244–2252 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tampuu, A., et al.: Multiagent cooperation and competition with deep reinforcement learning. PLoS one 12(4), e0172395 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan, M.: Multi-agent reinforcement learning: independent vs. cooperative agents. In: Proceedings of the tenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 330–337 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vinyals, O., et al.: Starcraft ii: a new challenge for reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.04782 (2017)

  22. Watkins, C.J., Dayan, P.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3–4), 279–292 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wen, Y., Yang, Y., Luo, R., Wang, J., Pan, W.: Probabilistic recursive reasoning for multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09207 (2019)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankur Deka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Deka, A., Sycara, K. (2021). Natural Emergence of Heterogeneous Strategies in Artificially Intelligent Competitive Teams. In: Tan, Y., Shi, Y. (eds) Advances in Swarm Intelligence. ICSI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12689. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78743-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78743-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78742-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78743-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics