Abstract
The experimental observation of gravitational waves in recent years has generated much excitement. In this instance, the interplay between theory and experiment is intriguing. The groundbreaking Eötvös experiment was undertaken around 1900, followed by Einstein’s prediction. Experimental observations occurred a century later. The question arises, ‘Can such experimental experiences be recreated in university and school laboratory programs’? Various phrases have been coined for such learning experiences, authentic, inquiry, to the practice of physics. Furthermore, the learning experiences are given different names, experiments, practicals and investigations; and in the current, context can be referred to as inquiry-based learning, project-based learning to STEM projects. In whatever form, curricula and pedagogies internationally are aspiring to instil the wonder of science through such pedagogies. But how can we tell if they are effective? And even more fundamentally, what does ‘effective’ mean? It is important to note that there are genuine challenges, from defining effective to, how to measure or evaluate. This paper seeks to provide insights by sharing two decades of research on experimentation in the Australian context. The strength of the work is that it straddles schools and universities, intertwining science disciplines, identifying commonalities and threads, binding the sciences together.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ASELL Schools Link (2005). https://asell.org/. Last accessed 2021/01/15
Barrie SC, Bucat RB, Buntine MA, Burke da Silva K, Crisp GT, George AV, Jamie IM, Kable SH, Lim KF, Pyke SM, Read JR, Sharma MD, Yeung A (2015) Development, evaluation and use of a student experience survey in undergraduate science laboratories: the advancing science by enhancing learning in the laboratory student laboratory learning experience survey. Int J Sci Ed 37:1795–1814
Bassett-Jones N, Lloyd GC (2005) Does Herzberg’s motivation theory have staying power? J Manage Dev 24:929–943
Bhansali A, Sharma MD (2019) The achievement emotions questionnaire: validation and implementation for undergraduate physics practicals. Int J Innov Sci Math Educ 27(9):34–46
Biggs JB (2003) Teaching for quality learning at university, 2nd edn. Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education, Buckingham
Cornish S, Yeung A, Kable SH, Orgill M, Sharma MD (2019) Using teacher voices to develop the ASELL Schools professional development workshops. Teach Sci 65:4–12
Driver R (1983) Pupil as a scientist. Open University Press, UK
Feynman R (1963) Lectures in physics 1-1. https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/. Last accessed 2019/06/30
Gordon T, Sharma MD, Georgiou H (2015) Shifting towards inquiry-oriented learning in a high school outreach program. Int J Innov Sci Math Ed 23:63–74
Gordon T, Georgiou H, Sharma MD (2019) Science in your pocket teaching science: leaving high school students to their own ‘devices’ while designing an inquiry-based investigation. Teach Sci 65(1):17–25
Hart C, Mulhall P, Berry A, Loughran J, Gunstone R (2000) What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? J Res Sci Teach 37:655–675
Herzberg F (1968) One more time: how do you motivate employees. Harv Bus Rev 46:53–62
Hofstein A, Mamlok-Naaman R (2007) The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chem Educ Res Pract 8:105–107
Kota S, Cornish S, Sharma MD (2019) Switched on! Student and Teacher engagement in an electricity practical. Phys Educ 54(1):015007
Richardson A, Sharma MD, Khachan J (2008) What are students learning in practicals? A cross sectional study in university physics laboratories. CAL-Labor Int 16:20–27
Schwab JJ (1960) Inquiry, the science teacher, and the educator. School Rev 68:176–195
Sharma MD, Pollard J, Mendez A, Mills D, O’Byrne J, Scott D, Hagon S, Gribble J, Kirkup L, Livett M, Low D, Merchant A, Rayner A, Swan G, Zadnick M, Zealey W (2008) What does a physics undergraduate education give you? A perspective from Australian physics. Eur J Phys 29:59–72
Sharma MD, Mendez A, Sefton IM, Khachan J (2014) Student evaluation of research projects in a first-year physics laboratory. Euro J Phys 35:025004
Sharma MD, Mills D, Mendez A, Pollard J (2005) Learning outcomes and curriculum development in physics. http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/super/AUTC. Last accessed 2021/01/15
Wald G (1999) Nobel lectures: physiology or medicine 1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.1142/3737
Yeung A, Pyke SM, Sharma MD, Barrie SC, Buntine MA, Burke Da Silva K, Kable SH, Lim KF (2011) The advancing science by enhancing learning in the laboratory (ASELL) project: the first Australian multidisciplinary workshop. Int J Innov Sci Math Educ 19(2):51–72
Yeung A, Cornish S, Kable S, Sharma MD (2019) What can instructors focus on when improving undergraduate science experiments? Supporting a cross-disciplinary approach Int J Innov Sci Math Educ 27:25–40
Acknowledgements
The work has been supported by many grants and undertaken by a team of students and collaborators. The author is immensely grateful to all.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharma, M.D. (2021). Experimentation in Physics Education: Should We Bother. In: Jarosievitz, B., Sükösd, C. (eds) Teaching-Learning Contemporary Physics . Challenges in Physics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78720-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78720-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78719-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78720-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)