Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experiencing Embodied Cognition from the Outside

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Embodied Psychology

Abstract

Embodied cognition has been put forth as an alternative to mainstream approaches to cognitive psychology, which supporters claim do not and cannot consider perception and action. Are depictions of cognitive psychology put forth by embodied cognition proponents accurate? To answer this question, we summarize foundational research in cognitive psychology and show that it addresses many of the issues that are considered significant in embodied approaches. We distinguish simple embodiment from radical embodiment and argue that the former is not fundamentally different from mainstream cognitive psychology because it falls within a worldview called mechanism. Radical embodiment is fundamentally different because it falls within the worldview of contextualism, of which the radical empiricism endorsed by Gibson and radical behaviorism advocated by Skinner are varieties. We argue that the incorporation of concepts from Gibson’s ecological psychology within a representational approach leads to misleading claims and confusion. We conclude that researchers who espouse radical embodiment should accept all of its implications and researchers who endorse simple embodiment should accept that they are part of the same research enterprise as other cognitive psychologists.

To appear in Embodied Psychology: Thinking, Feeling, and Acting, Michael Robinson & Laura Thomas (Eds.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn, B. (2010). The radical in radical behaviorism. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/radical-behaviorist/201002/the-radical-in-radical-behaviorism

  • Anderson, S. J., Yamagishi, N., & Karavia, V. (2002). Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1225–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2010). Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 716–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2016). Situated conceptualization: Theory and applications. In Y. Coello & M. H. Fisher (Eds.), Perceptual and emotional embodiment (pp. 11–37). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W., & Prinz, J. J. (1997). Mundane creativity in perceptual symbol systems. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 267–307). APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Pergamon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, W. S., & Vecera, S. P. (2014). Differential effect of one versus two hands on visual processing. Cognition, 133, 232–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caligiore, D., Borghi, A. M., Parisi, D., & Baldassarre, G. (2010). TRoPICALS: A computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. Psychological Review, 117, 1188–1228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, E. J., & Proctor, R. W. (1999). Contextualism in psychological research? A critical review. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemero, A. (2013). Radical embodied cognitive science. Review of General Psychology, 17, 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, I., & Proctor, R. W. (2020). On the evolution of a radical concept: Affordances according to Gibson and their subsequent use and development. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 117–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 345–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. J. (1948). Theory of the human operator in control systems. II. Man as an element in a control system. British Journal of Psychology, 38, 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dambacher, M., & HĂĽbner, R. (2013). Investigating the speed–accuracy trade-off: Better use deadlines or response signals? Behavior Research Methods, 45, 702–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davoli, C. C., & Brockmole, J. R. (2012). The hands shield attention from visual interference. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1386–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J., Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2017). Psychological engineering: A functional–cognitive perspective on applied psychology. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donders, F. C. (1868/1969). On the speed of mental processes. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 412–431). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2018). Bodies and other objects: The sensorimotor foundations of cognition. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. D., Barr, P. S., & Hargadon, A. B. (2005). Identifying Situated Cognition in Organizations. Organization Science, 16, 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R. (1988a). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the human factors society 32nd annual meeting (pp. 97–101). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M. R. (1988b). Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In Proceedings of the national aerospace and electronics conference (pp. 789–795). New York: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincher-Kiefer, R. (2019). How the body shapes knowledge: Empirical support for embodied cognition. APA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franchak, J. M., & Adolph, K. E. (2014). Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 460–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galetzka, C. (2017). The story so far: How embodied cognition advances our understanding of meaning-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarini, F., & Adenzato, M. (2004). At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition, 56, 100–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 52–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1997). How language reflects the embodied nature of creative cognition. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 351–373). APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1967). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. In E. G. Boring & G. Lindzey (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (vol. 5, pp. 127–143). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. J. (2015). Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 971–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M. (1997). Mental models, space, and embodied cognition. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 495–522). APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldinger, S. D., Papesh, M. H., Barnhart, A. S., Hansen, W. A., & Hout, M. C. (2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 959–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gozli, D. G., West, G. L., & Pratt, J. (2012). Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. Cognition, 124, 244–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haber, R. N. (Ed.). (1969). Information-processing approaches to visual perception. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hinshaw, K. E. (1991). The effects of mental practice on motor skill performance: Critical evaluation and meta-analysis. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 11, 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. R., & Nead, J. M. (1983). General contextualism, ecological science and cognitive research. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, 507–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (Eds.). (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, S. L. (1998). Consciousness in action. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, I. (2012). Remembering the father of cognitive psychology. APS Observer, 25(5). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/remembering-the-father-of-cognitive-psychology

  • Ishak, S., Assoian, A. B., & Rincon, S. (2019). Experience influences affordance perception for low crawling under barriers with altered body dimensions. Ecological Psychology, 31, 332–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janczyk, M., & Lerche, V. (2019). A diffusion model analysis of the response-effect compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. P., & Brockmole, J. R. (2014). Hand proximity differentially affects visual working memory for color and orientation in a binding task. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M., Pinker, S., Smith, G. E., & Shwartz, S. P. (1979). On the demystification of mental imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387–394.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, R., Lachman, J. L., & Butterfield, E. C. (1975). Cognitive psychology and information processing: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, J. (2015). Embodied social cognition. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, L., Heras-Escribano, M., & Travieso, D. (2018). The history and philosophy of ecological psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth, N. H. (1948). The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, B. Z. (2015). What is embodied about cognition? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 420–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J. (2018). Intentions and actions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie ExpĂ©rimentale, 72, 219–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, W. (1965). Embodiments of mind. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1986). Dismembering cognition. In S. H. Hulse & B. F. Green (Eds.), One hundred years of psychological research in America (pp. 277–298). The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York, NY: Henry Holt, & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2018). Skinner, Gibson, and embodied robots: Challenging the orthodoxy of the impoverished stimulus. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 38, 140–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. K. (1988). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 289–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murchison, N. M., & Proctor, R. W. (2015). How hand placement modulates interference from extraneous stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 340–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1963). Learning of adjective-noun paired associates as a function of adjective-noun word order and noun abstractness. Canadian Journal of Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 17, 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1965). Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in paired associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 45, 255–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, Z. (2014). Dissociating Simon and affordance compatibility effects: Silhouettes and photographs. Cognition, 133, 716–728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study of evidence. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. C., & Ward, R. (2002). SR correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition, 9, 540–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1975). Editorial. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., & Miles, J. D. (2014). Does the concept of affordance add anything to explanations of stimulus–response compatibility effects? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 60, pp. 227–266). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.). (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P.L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application. CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., Reeve, T. G., & Van Zandt, T. (1992). Salient-features coding in response selection. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior, 2 (pp. 727–741). North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1980). Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 111–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rank, M., & Di Luca, M. (2015). Speed/accuracy tradeoff in force perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 738–746.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rattat, A.-C., Matha, P., & Cegarra, J. (2018). Time flies faster under time pressure. Acta Psychologica, 185, 81–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, C. L., Betz, R., Garza, J. P., & Roberts, R. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, R. A., & Tansey, E. M. (2003). The MRC applied psychology unit. In Welcome witnesses to twentieth century medicine (Vol. 16). London: The Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. (1967a). Mental practice: A review and discussion Part II. Research Quarterly., 38, 263–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. (1967b). Mental practice: A review and discussion Part I. Research Quarterly., 38, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (2009). A short primer on situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3–10). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. W., Lyons, J., Garcia, D. B. L., Burgess, R., & Elliott, D. (2017). Gunslinger effect and MĂĽller-Lyer illusion: Examining early visual information processing for late limb-target control. Motor Control, 21, 284–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, S. N. (1997). The adolescence of engineering psychology. The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M. (2018). Reading comprehension is embodied: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. W. (2017). Visual selective attention with virtual barriers. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1275–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1961). Current trends in experimental psychology. In B. F. Skinner (Eds.) Cumulative record: A selection of papers (2nd ed., pp. 223–241). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Adjusting sample sizes for different categories of embodied cognition research. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E. (2001). Cognitive psychology: History. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 2140–2147). Pergamon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach, G. E. (Ed.). (1978). Information processing in motor control and learning. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symes, E., Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2005). Dissociating object-based and space-based affordances. Visual Cognition, 12, 1337–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. E. (2015). Grasp posture alters visual processing biases near the hands. Psychological Science, 26, 625–632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. E. (2017). Action experience drives visual-processing biases near the hands. Psychological Science, 28, 124–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., & Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 493–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (2009). Spatial cognition: Embodied and situated. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 201–216). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R., Schröter, H., Leuthold, H., & Birngruber, T. (2015). Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 148–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UmiltĂ , C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89–116). North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., & Robison, M. K. (2020). Working memory capacity and sustained attention: A cognitive-energetic perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 77–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2012). Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: An examination of differences in accessibility. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2397–2410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, W. R. (1971). The psychobiological silly season-or-What happens when neurophysiological data become psychological theories. Journal of General Psychology, 84, 151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (Eds.). (1997). Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 267–307). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weser, V., & Proffitt, D. R. (2019). Tool embodiment: The tool’s output must match the user’s input. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, R. M., & Francken, J. C. (2012). Embodied cognition: Taking the next step. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, B. E., & Carbon, C.-C. (2017). An easy game for frauds? Effects of professional experience and time pressure on passport-matching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23, 138–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, A., & Proctor, R. W. (2018). Information processing: The language and analytical tools for cognitive psychology in the information age. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA

    Robert W. Proctor & Isis Chong

Authors
  1. Robert W. Proctor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isis Chong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Proctor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. NDSU Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA

    Michael D. Robinson

  2. NDSU Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA

    Laura E. Thomas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Proctor, R.W., Chong, I. (2021). Experiencing Embodied Cognition from the Outside. In: Robinson, M.D., Thomas, L.E. (eds) Handbook of Embodied Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation