Skip to main content

ASH: A New Tool for Automated and Full-Text Search in Systematic Literature Reviews

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science – ICCS 2021 (ICCS 2021)

Abstract

Context: Although there are many tools for performing Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs), none allows searching for articles using their full text across multiple digital libraries. Goal: This study aimed to show that searching the full text of articles is important for SLRs, and to provide a way to perform such searches in an automated and unified way. Method: The authors created a tool that allows users to download the full text of articles and perform a full-text search. Results: The tool, named ASH, provides a meta-search interface that allows users to obtain much higher search completeness, unifies the search process across all digital libraries, and can overcome the limitations of individual search engines. We use a practical example to identify the potential value of the tool and the limitations of some of the existing digital library search facilities. Conclusions: Our example confirms both that it is important to create such tools and how they can potentially improve the SLR search process. Although the tool does not support all stages of SLR, our example confirms its value for supporting the SLR search process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Zubidy, A., Carver, J.C.: Identification and prioritization of SLR search tool requirements: an SLR and a survey. Empir. Softw. Eng. 24(1), 139–169 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. BA, K., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical report (2007), version 2.3

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowes, D., Hall, T., Beecham, S.: SLuRp: a tool to help large complex systematic literature reviews deliver valid and rigorous results. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evidential Assessment of Software Technologies, pp. 33–36. EAST 2012. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dieste, O., Grimán, A., Juristo, N.: Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments. Empir. Softw. Eng. 14(5), 513–539 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández-Sáez, A.M., Genero Bocco, M., Romero, F.P.: SLR-TOOL - a tool for performing systematic literature reviews. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, vol. 2: ICSOFT, pp. 157–166. INSTICC, SciTePress (2010). https://doi.org/10.5220/0003003601570166

  6. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Technical report (08 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Budgen, D.: The educational value of mapping studies of software engineering literature. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 589–598. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., Brereton, P.: Evidence-Based Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kitchenham, B.A., et al.: Refining the systematic literature review process-two participant-observer case studies. Empir. Softw. Eng. 15(6), 618–653 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitchenham, B.A., Dybå, T., Jørgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering. In: ICSE 2004: International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 273–281 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marchezan, L., Bolfe, G., Rodrigues, E., Bernardino, M., Basso, F.P.: Thoth: a web-based tool to support systematic reviews. In: ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). pp. 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marshall, C., Brereton, P.: Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a mapping study. In: ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 296–299 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marshall, C., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P.: Tool features to support systematic reviews in software engineering - a cross domain study. e-Informatica Softw. Eng. J. 12(1), 79–115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5277/e-Inf180104

  14. Molléri, J.S., Benitti, F.B.V.: SESRA: a web-based automated tool to support the systematic literature review process. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. EASE 2015, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Navarrete, C.B., Malverde, M.G.M., Lagos, P.S., Mujica, A.D.: Buhos: a web-based systematic literature review management software. SoftwareX 7, 360–372 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Petrović, G., Ivanković, M.: State of mutation testing at Google. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering Software Engineering in Practice - ICSE-SEIP 2018. ACM Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramampiaro, H., Cruzes, D., Conradi, R., Mendona, M.: Supporting evidence-based software engineering with collaborative information retrieval. In: 6th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2010), pp. 1–5 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.collaboratecom.2010.9

  18. Sośnicki, M.: (2020). https://github.com/LechMadeyski/AutomatedSearchHelper/wiki

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Barbara Kitchenham for reviewing this paper before its submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sośnicki, M., Madeyski, L. (2021). ASH: A New Tool for Automated and Full-Text Search in Systematic Literature Reviews. In: Paszynski, M., Kranzlmüller, D., Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., Dongarra, J.J., Sloot, P.M. (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2021. ICCS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12744. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77967-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77967-2_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77966-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77967-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics