Skip to main content

Abstract

As educators we actively promote equity in classrooms, face-to-face interactions that include emotions of caring, and empathy. Educators know how intricate the social-emotional connection is for learners. While social media involves cognitive manipulation and fake news (Menczer & Hills, 2020), that should not be a part of curriculum development, teacher strategies, and assessments. Educators must become active players with AI systems and AI agency development by using the strategies teachers know well. This is our revolution to grapple with, quickly. As the AI revolution creates AI agency, what are the questions we as educational leaders need to ask? In the professoriate, we ask who owns our classes we create? In AI, we ask who owns the algorithm and the model created from student data? Who owns the data that is being captured by AI agents? Who owns hidden data?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annamma, S. A., & Handy, T. (2021, January/February). Sharpening justice through discrit: A contrapuntal analysis of education. Educational Researcher, 50(1), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beta Writer. (2019). Lithium-Ion batteries: A machine-generated summary of current research. Springer Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16800-1

  • Bhadra, R. (2019, September 5). What is a neural network? The basic concept of neural network. Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/what-is-a-neural-network-a02b3c2fe3fa

  • Bostrom, N. (2017a). Strategic implications of openness in AI development. https://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/openness.pdf

  • Bostrom, N. (2014; 2011). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In K. Frankish and W. Ramsey (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139046855

  • Bostrom, N. (2005a). Transhumanist values. In F. Adams (Ed.), Ethical Issues for the 21st century. Philosophical Documentation Center Press, Bowling Green University. Transthumanist Values (nickbostrom.com).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2002). Existential risks: Analyzing human extinction scenarios. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 9. https://www.nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.html

  • Center for Humane Technology. (n.d.-c). Digital wellbeing guidelines for parents during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.humanetech.com/digital-wellbeing-covid

  • Duignan, P.A. & Duignan, P.A. (2020). Navigating the future of learning: The role of smart technologies. Leading Educational Systems and Schools in Times of Disruption and Exponential Change: A Call for Courage, Commitment and Collaboration, pp. 125–137. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Publishing Limited. Https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/978-1-83909-850-520201012/full/html

  • English, F. & Papa, R. (2010). Restoring human agency to educational administration: Status and strategies. ProActive. ISBN 1-885432-50-X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidley, M. J. (2019a). Transhumanism. In P. Heike (Ed.), Critical terms in future studies, pp. 319–326. ISBN 978-3-030-28987-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • GraciousQuotes.com. (2020). Socrates. 102 Socrates Quotes on Life & Happiness (WISDOM) (graciousquotes.com).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasibuan, M. S., Nugroho, L. E., & Santosa, P. I. (2019). Model detecting learning styles with artificial neural network. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, V. (2020, Jul/Aug). Imagine all the people: America’s transformation has been revolutionary collective action, pp. 4–6. https://www.wired.com/story/covid-19-new-american-revolution/

  • Menczer, F. & Hills, T. (2020, December). The attention economy: Understanding how algorithms and manipulators exploit our cognitive vulnerabilities empowers us to fight back. Scientific America, 323(6), 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Education at a glance 2016: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2016-en.

  • Osbon, D. K. (1991). Reflections on the art of living: A Joseph Campbell companion. Quality Books. ISBN: 0060926171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papa, R., English, F., Davidson, F., Culver, M. K., & Brown, R. (2013). Contours of great leadership: The science, art, and wisdom of outstanding practice. Roman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-61048-831-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, H., Halasa-Rappel, Y., & Khan, A. (2018). Economic growth and youth unemployment and political and social instability: A study of policies and outcomes in post-Arab Spring Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, and Tunisia. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Working Paper 2018-12. Economic Growth, Youth Unemployment, and Political and Social Instability (unrisd.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, J. S., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2020, November). The child as hacker. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(11), 900–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.005

  • Shapiro, J., & Blackman, R. (2020, July 24). Four steps for drafting an ethical data practices blueprint. https://techcrunch.com/2020/07/24/four-steps-for-an-ethical-data-practices-blueprint/

  • Simon, H. A. (1995). Explaining the ineffable: AI on the topics of intuition, insight and inspiration. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 939–948. http://digitalcollections.library.cmu.edu/awweb/awarchive?type=file&item=34222

Visone

  • National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2018b). National Educational Leadership Preparation (NELP) Program Recognition Standards - Building Level. www.npbea.org

Brown

  • Bostrom, N. (2017b). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. : Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Sánchez

Rosario-Moore

  • Arendt, H. (1978). The life of the mind: The groundbreaking investigation on how we think. In M. McCarthy (Ed.), The life of the mind: The groundbreaking investigation on how we think, Combined Volumes 1 and 2. : Harcourt, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall, E. F. (1989). The contents of Hesiod’s Pandora jar: Erga 94–98. Hermes, 117(H. 2), 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, R. (2020). 2020 vision: Reimagining the default settings of technology & society. International Conference on Learning Representations. https://iclr.cc/virtual_2020/speaker_3.html

  • Bulger, M. (2016). Personalized learning: The conversations we’re not having. Data and Society, 22(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. K., Moore, D. M. M., & Magliaro, S. G. (2004). Behaviorism and instructional technology. https://ocw.metu.edu.tr/pluginfile.php/8751/mod_resource/content/1/Behaviorism%20and%20instructional%20technology.pdf

  • Chrysafiadi, K., & Virvou, M. (2013). Student modeling approaches: A literature review for the last decade. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(11), 4715–4729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows, N. J. (1994). A window into thinking: Using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning. Journal of Research in science teaching, 31(9), 985–10012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headden, S. (2013). The promise of personalized learning: Blending the human touch with technological firepower. Education Next, 13(4), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, B. (2017). Gates, Zuckerberg teaming up on personalized learning. Education Week, 36(36), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhasz, A. (2020, August). City Council hears back-to-school concerns in 6-hour Meeting. https://www.wwno.org/post/city-council-hears-back-school-concerns-6-hour-meeting

  • Klein, P. D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11(3), 203–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Profit. (2017, April). New Profit launches personalized learning initiative. http://blog.newprofit.org/amplify/new-profit-launches-personalized-learning-initiative

  • Pane, J. F. (2018). Strategies for implementing personalized learning while evidence and resources are underdeveloped. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE314.html

  • Regan, P. M., & Jesse, J. (2019). Ethical challenges of edtech, big data and personalized learning: Twenty-first century student sorting and tracking. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(3), 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, J. A. (1990). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. Intelligent Tutoring Systems: At the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 41, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, G. M., & Nash, J. G. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring knowledge change due to writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, N. N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing. Written communication, 7(2), 256–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New Teacher Project. (2019). What we do. https://tntp.org/what-we-do

  • Turing, I. B. A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence-AM Turing. Mind, 59(236), 433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1996). The effects of ‘playing historian’ on learning in history. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(7), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

Soles

  • Adams, M. G. (2016). Change your questions, change your life: 12 powerful tools for leadership, coaching, and life. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenta, R. (2020, June 11). Authentic Engagement for Diverse Learners [PowerPoint slides]. https://cc.csusm.edu/course/view.php?id=30402#section-11

  • Bostrom, N. (2005b). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of evolution and technology, 14(1), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. B., & LMSW, B. (2012). The power of vulnerability. Critical Terms in Futures Studies. (2020). Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross TL, Bazron BJ, Dennis KW, & Isaacs MR. Towards a Culturally Competent System of Care: A Monograph on Effective Services for Minority Children Who Are Severely Emotionally Disturbed. : CASSP Technical Assistance Center, Georgetown University Child Development Center; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, A., & Chrispeels, J. (2008). A question of trust: Predictive conditions for adaptive and technical leadership in educational contexts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(1), 30–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiAngelo, R. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumming, N. (2016). (2016, August 18). : Metropolis Now. In We Are in the Future. This American Life. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/archive?keyword=afrofuturism

  • Raz, G. (2017a, September 15). Paul Knoepfler: What are the Unintended consequences of human gene editing? In Future Consequences. . National Publication Radio. https://www.npr.org/programs/ted-radio-hour/547886174/future-consequences

  • Gidley, J. M. (2019b). Transhumanism. In H. Paul (Ed.), Critical Terms in Futures Studies (pp. 319–326). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning: Social, teaching and cognitive presence. In C. Howard et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance and online learning (2nded., pp. 352–355). IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Leonardo, Z. (2018). Intersectionality, race-gender subordination, and education. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumashiro, K. (2000). Toward a theory of anti-oppressive education. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, D. B., Jungwirth, L. D., Lindsey, R. B., & Pahl, J. V. (Eds.). (2009). Culturally proficient learning communities: Confronting inequities through collaborative curiosity. Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, R. B., Nuri-Robins, K., Terrell, R. D., & Lindsey, D. B. (2018). Cultural proficiency: A manual for school leaders. Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, K. C., Fowler, B., & Rainbolt, S. (2018). The potential of restorative practices to ameliorate discipline gaps: The story of one high school’s leadership team. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(2), 303–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. (1996). Redesigning school: Lessons for the 21st century. Jossey-Bass. Part I, pp. 23–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintrop, R. (2019). Design-based school improvement: A practical guide for education leaders. Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K. (2016, December 9). Listening as activism: The “Sonic Meditations” of Pauline Oliveros. The New Yorker.. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/listening-as-activism-the-sonic-meditations-of-pauline-oliveros

  • Paul, H. (2019). Critical terms in futures studies. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, G. E. (2014). Courageous conversations about race: A field guide for achieving equity in schools. Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, C. M. (2018). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable and socially just change in an uncertain and complex world. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siyahhan, S., & Gee, E. (2018). Families at play: Connecting and learning through video games. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soles, B., & Maduli-Williams, D. (2019). Student Perceptions of an Accelerated Online Master’s in Education Administration Program through the Lens of Social Presence. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 30, 56–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soles, B. L. (2013). The SHU:SH Project Slurs Hurt Us: Safety and Health-Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Students at School (Doctoral dissertation, ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soles, B., Flores III, P., Domingues, J., & Solis, F. (2020). The Role of Formal and Nonformal Leaders in Creating Culturally Proficient Educational Practices. In Overcoming Current Challenges in the P-12 Teaching Profession (pp. 144–172). IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E., Guess, A., & Sultan, H. (2014). Not nowhere: Collaborating on selfsame land. Decolonization: indigeneity, education & society, 26(June), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, A. (2015). Introducing the social presence model to explore online and blended learning experiences. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, (March 2015), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

Chen & Arar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rosemary Papa or Karen Moran Jackson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Papa, R., Jackson, K.M. (2021). Education in 2051. In: Papa, R., Moran Jackson, K. (eds) Artificial Intelligence, Human Agency and the Educational Leader. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77610-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77610-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77609-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77610-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics