Skip to main content

Effect of Natural Reinforcement Aperture Shape on Bearing Capacity of Reinforced Soil

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Transportation Geotechnics IV

Abstract

It is of interest, for a developing country like India, to use natural and low-cost reinforcement material in rural roads. Bamboo is a locally and cheaply available alternative as a reinforcement material in place of commercial geosynthetic materials. The tridirectional bamboo grid is a new innovative reinforcement of the limited life geotextiles (LLGs) family. The present paper reports the experimental results of plate load tests conducted on sand overlying a soft clay. The model plate load tests were carried out to study the influence of the tridirectional and bidirectional bamboo grid with jute geotextile on the bearing capacity of soft marine clay. A mild steel tank with dimensions of 0.7 m × 0.7 m × 0.6 m and a square model footing size of 100 mm × 100 mm were used for all laboratory model tests. It was observed that by making a suitable modification in the aperture shape of reinforcement, the bearing capacity and settlement resistance of soft clay could be improved. The model test results show that the tridirectional bamboo grid offers superior performance compared to the bidirectional bamboo grid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gourc JP, Matichard Y, Perier H, Delmas P (1982) Capacite Portant d’un Bicouhe, Sable sur Sol Mou, Reinforce par Geotextile. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on geotextiles, vol 2, pp 411–417

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sridharan A, Srinivasa Murthy BR, Bindumadhava F, Vasudervan AK (1988) Reinforced soil foundation on soft soil. In: Proceedings of the 1st Indian geotextiles conference, pp C.53–C.60

    Google Scholar 

  3. Das BM (1989) Foundation sand underlain by soft clay with geotextile at sand-clay interface. In: Proceedings of the geosynthetics ‘89 conference, vol 1, pp 203–214

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dembicki E, Alenowicz J (1990) Influence of geotextiles on bearing capacity of two-layer subsoil. Constr Build Mater 4(1):49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alenowicz J, Dembicki E (1991) Recent laboratory research on unpaved road behaviour. Geotext Geomembr 10(1):21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KM, Manjunath VR, Dewaikar DM (1999) Numerical and model studies of strip footing supported by a reinforced granular fill–soft soil system. Can Geotech J 36(5):793–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Som N, Sahu RB (1999) Bearing capacity of a geotextile–reinforced unpaved road as a function of deformation: a model study. Geosynth Int 6(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mandal JN, Sah HS (1992) Bearing capacity tests on geogrid-reinforced clay. Geotext Geomembr 11(3):327–333

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khing KH, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC, Cook EE (1994) Foundation on strong sand underlain by weak clay with geogrid at the interface. Geotext Geomembr 13(3):199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alawaji HA (2001) Settlement and bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced sand over collapsible soil. Geotext Geomembr 19(2):75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Demir A, Laman A, Yildiz A, Ornek M (2013) Large scale field tests on geogrid reinforced granular fill underlain by clay soil. Geotext Geomembr 38:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akinmusuru AM, Akinbolade JA (1981) Stability of loaded footings on reinforced soil. ASCE J Geotech Eng Div 107(GT6):819–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixit RK (1985) Experimental investigations of model square footing in reinforced sand. M. Tech. thesis, IIT Bombay, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mandal JN (1987) Geotextiles in India. Geotext Geomembr 6(4):253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramanatha Ayyar TS, Joseph J, Beena KS (1988) Bearing capacity of sand reinforced with coir rope. In: Proceedings of the 1st Indian geotextiles conference, pp C.53–C.60

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mandal JN, Manjunath VR (1994) Bearing capacity of strip footing resting on reinforced sand subgrades. Constr Build Mater 9(1):35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Datye KR, Gore VN (1994) Geotextile bamboo fascine mattress for filling over very soft soils in Malaysia. Geotext Geomembr 13(6–7):371–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khatib A (2009) Bearing capacity of granular soil overlying soft clay reinforced with bamboo-geotextile composite at the interface. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Univ. Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2015) Use of bamboo in soft-ground engineering and its performance comparison with geosynthetics: experimental studies. J Mater Civ Eng 27(9):04014256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dutta S, Mandal JN (2016) Model studies on geocell-reinforced fly ash bed overlying soft clay. J Mater Civ Eng 28(2):04015091

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ye F, Fu W (2017) Physical and mechanical characterization of fresh bamboo for infrastructure projects. J Mater Civ Eng 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002132

  22. Ahirwar SK, Mandal JN (2018) Behaviour of bamboo grid-reinforced soil bed. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1550909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Basu G, Roy AN, Bhattacharyya SK, Ghosh SK (2009) Construction of unpaved rural road using jute–synthetic blended woven geotextile—a case study. Geotext Geomembr 27(6):506–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sanyal T, Chakraborty K (1994) Application of a bitumen-coated jute geotextile in bank-protection works in the Hooghly estuary. Geotext Geomembr 13(2):67–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saha P, Roy D, Manna S, Adhikari B, Sen R, Roy S (2012) Durability of transesterified jute geotextiles. Geotext Geomembr 35:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gnanaharan R (2000) Preservative treatment methods for bamboo: a review. KFRI research report, 177, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  27. Prasad DSV, Kumar AM, Prasada Raju GVR (2010) Behavior of reinforced sub bases on expansive. Glob J Res Eng 10(1):2–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil K. Ahirwar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ahirwar, S.K., Mandal, J.N. (2022). Effect of Natural Reinforcement Aperture Shape on Bearing Capacity of Reinforced Soil. In: Tutumluer, E., Nazarian, S., Al-Qadi, I., Qamhia, I.I. (eds) Advances in Transportation Geotechnics IV. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 165. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77234-5_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77234-5_55

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77233-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77234-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics