Skip to main content

State Coercion: Attempt at Interdisciplinary Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Сooperation and Sustainable Development

Abstract

The authors analyze the main approaches of philosophers, sociologists, and law theorists to the definition of the concepts of coercion and state coercion attempting to develop an integrative definition of the concept of state coercion. This concept can be used for finding common grounds between different concepts related to law and state in the vein of interdisciplinary theoretical research. If coercion as a social phenomenon takes the form of state coercion, the concept of state coercion logically connects such phenomena as law and state. Based on the analysis of the concepts of state coercion, the authors identified the structural elements of this notion, which are common to the majority of the considered concepts and therefore can be recognized as universal features of state coercion at this stage of legal science development. The authors concluded that the characteristics of coercion and power indicate the fact that coercion is directly related or is a part of the concept of power (taking into consideration that coercion has an independent attribute not related to power as a whole). At the same time, it means that the content of the concept of coercion, including state coercion, is narrower in comparison with the concept of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arneson R (2003) Equality, coercion, culture and social norms. Polit Philos Econ 2:139–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman M (2013) Coercion, compulsion, and the medicaid expansion: a study in the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. Texas Law Rev 91:1283–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Black’s Law Dictionary (1990) West Publishing, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim É (1974) Sociology and philosophy. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis J (2011) Natural law and natural rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Finogentova O, Tokarev V, Petrenko M, Primak T (2018) Acceptance criterion of state coercion in contemporary society. Entrep Sustain Issues 6(2):820–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1960) The constitution of liberty. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel G (2001) Philosophy of right. Batoche Books, Kitchener

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornby A (2015) Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes R (2013) Law and coercion. Philos Compass 8(3):231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1998) Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen H (1967) Pure theory of law. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Korkunov N (1922) General theory of law. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamond G (2001) Coercion and the nature of law. Leg Theory 7:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiser BM (2008) On coercion. In: Reidy D, Riker W (eds) Coercion and the state. Springer, Netherlands, pp 31–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D (1991) The idea of law. Penguin Books Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners (2002) MacMillan. In: A. & C. Black; 2 Pap/Cdr edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2019) https://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed 10 Mar 2021

  • Raponi S (2015) Is coercion necessary for law? The role of coercion in international and domestic law. Wash Univ Jurid Rev 35:35–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Blanco V (2007) Is Finnis wrong? Understanding normative jurisprudence. Leg Theory 13(3–4):257–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schauer F (2014) The force of law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Somek A (2006) Stateless law: Kelsen’s conception and its limits. Oxf J Legal Stud 26(4):753–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavropoulos N (2009) The relevance of coercion: some preliminaries. Ratio Juris 22:339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1968) Economy and society. Bedmini ster. Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollner G (2011) Equality and the significance of coercion. J Soc Philos 42:363–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga E. Finogentova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Finogentova, O.E., Tokarev, V.A., Petrenko, M.N. (2022). State Coercion: Attempt at Interdisciplinary Research. In: Bogoviz, A.V., Suglobov, A.E., Maloletko, A.N., Kaurova, O.V. (eds) Сooperation and Sustainable Development. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 245. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77000-6_93

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics