Abstract
This workshop was dedicated to a discussion of epistemological and didactic aspects of mathematical structuralism with a focus on Abstract Algebra, in particular Group Theory. The participants worked on a corpus of documents comprising excerpts of the Bourbaki Manifesto “the architecture of mathematics” and the transcript of a discussion thread from a mathematical forum online. To what extent does mathematical structuralism rely on didactic principles? How is this reflected in a teaching-learning environment? The key construct within the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic was the theoretical notion of “structuralist praxeology”, introduced by the author. The analyses of the corpus led to the discussion of the rationale of such praxeologies, their historical development, how they may be reconstructed by learners, and the role played by the “dialectic of objects and structures” that should be added to Chevallard’s model for study and research processes in order to account for the development of structuralist praxeologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bosch, M., & Winsløw, C. (2016). Linking problem solving and learning content: The challenges of self–sustained study and research processes. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 35(3), 357–401.
Bosch, M., Gascón, J., & Nicolás, P. (2018). Questioning mathematical knowledge in different didactic paradigms: The case of group theory. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 23–37.
Bourbaki, N. (1950). The architecture of mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 4(57), 221–232.
Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps toward a new epistemology in mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME4) (pp. 21–30). FUNDEMIIQS.
Chevallard, Y. (2009). Un concept en émergence: la dialectique des médias et des milieux. In G. Gueudet & Y. Matheron (Eds.), Actes du séminaire national de didactique des mathématiques, année 2007 (pp. 344–366). IREM de Paris 7.
Corry, L. (1996). Modern algebra and the rise of mathematical structures (2nd ed., 2004). Birkhäuser.
Dummit, D. S., & Foote, R. M. (2003). Abstract Algebra (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Hausberger, T. (2018a). Structuralist praxeologies as a research program in the didactics of abstract algebra. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 74–93.
Hausberger, T. (2018b). Abstract algebra teaching and learning (entry on). In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (live edition). Springer.
Hausberger, T. (2019). Enseignement et apprentissage de l’algèbre abstraite à l’Université : vers un paradigme du questionnement du monde. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 21(4), 322–337.
Perrin, D. (1996). Cours d’algèbre. Editions Ellipses.
Winsløw, C. (2008). Transformer la théorie en tâches : la transition du concret à l’abstrait en analyze réelle. In R. Rouchier et al. (Eds.), Actes de la XIIIème Ecole d’Eté de Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 1–12). La Pensée Sauvage.
Wussing, H. (2007). The genesis of the abstract group concept. Dover Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hausberger, T. (2022). A Workshop on the Epistemology and Didactics of Mathematical Structuralism. In: Chevallard, Y., et al. Advances in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76791-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76791-4_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76790-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76791-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)