Abstract
This study aims to minimize the aggressive effect of the salinity on the cultivation of wheat (Triticum durum) and to come out with the right doses of organic matter at different levels of irrigation water salinity. To this end, we applied three levels of irrigation water salinity: EC 5 dS/m, EC 9 dS/m and EC 13 dS/m (EC: electrical conductivity of the irrigation salinity water, dS/m: decisiemens per meter), with three organic matter amounts “manure of poultry” doses: F0 = 0 t/ha, F1 = 30 t/ha and F2 = 60 t/ha (FV: manure of poultry doses, t/ha: tonne per hectare). We concluded that the effect of the manure poultry doses appeared in the second and third measures. Therefore, we can say that the results obtained in the doses of 30 and 60 t/ha were not so different, while the dose 30 t/ha was satisfied.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
M. Aylaji, E. Lhadi, M. Kabil, A. Ouaaka, Impact de la salinité de l’eau sur la qualité du sol et la betterave à sucre beta-vulgaris l. Déchets Rev. Francophone D’écol. Ind. N° 24 4ème trimestre 2001—reproduction interdite (2001)
H. Benmazhar, Etude de l’effet du fumier de bovin sur les propriétés physico-chimiques, la fertilité et dans la réduction de la salinité des sols sableux irrigués avec des eaux salines. Mémoire de stage de fin d’études Master Sciences et Techniques Eau et Environnement, Université Cadi Ayyad Faculté des Sciences et Techniques Marrakech (2012), p. 99
H.R. Guealia, Réponses hydriques et physiologiques du gombo (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) conduit sur substrat bentonisé sous contrainte saline (2019), p. 71
L. Jingang, J. Chen, J. Jin, S. Wang, B. Du, Effects of irrigation water salinity on maize (Zea may L.) emergence, growth, yield, quality, and soil salt. Water 11, 2095 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102095. www.mdpi.com/journal/water
N. Koull, M.T. Halilat, Effets de la matière organique sur les propriétés physiques et chimiques des sols sableux de la région d’Ouargla (Algérie). étude et Gestion des Sols, vol. 23 (2016), pp. 9–19
M.M. Kwey, S.K. Banze, J.B. Mukalay, Etude de cas sur l’impact des amendements organiques vis-à-vis de la salinité en culture de bananier. Afr. Sci. 11(3), 152–160 (2015). ISSN 1813-548X. http://www.afriquescience.info
A. Masmoudi, K. Guimeur, Evolution de la salinité dans la région de Biskra Conference Paper, Jan 2008. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322256184
M. Ouhaddach, H. ElYacoubi, A. Douaik, D. Hmouni, A. Rochdi, Physiological and biochemical responses to salt stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at the elongation stage. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 7(9), 3084–3099 (2016). ISSN: 2028-2508 CODEN: JMESC. http://www.jmaterenvironsci.com
R.K. Soothar, W. Zhang, B. Liu, M. Tankari, C. Wang, L. Li, H. Xing, D. Gong, Y. Wang, Sustaining yield of winter wheat under alternate irrigation using saline water at different growth stages: a case study in the north China plain. Sustainability 11, 4564 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174564. www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
J.T.A. Souza, L.F. Cavalcante, J.C. Nunes, F.T.C. Bezerra, A.d.S.N. Juliete, A.R. Silva, D. Oresca, A.G. Cavalcante, Effect of saline water, bovine biofertilizer and potassium on yellow passion fruit growth after planting and on soil salinity. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 11(32), 2994–3003 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11233. Article number: 493CBC659956. ISSN 1991-637X Copyright ©2016 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR
L. Zraibi, A. Nabloussi, J. Merimi, A. El Amrani, M. Kajeiou, A. Khalid, H. Serghini Caid, Effet du stress salin sur des paramètres physiologiques et agronomiques de différentes variétés de carthame (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Al Awamia 125–126 Décembre 2011, Juin 2012 (2012), p. 26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Annex 1
Modality | Average | Standard error | Bottom (95%) | Upper terminal (95%) | Groups |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV60 (S2) | 12.000 | 1.404 | 8.763 | 15.237 | A |
FV30 (S1) | 11.660 | 1.404 | 8.423 | 14.897 | A |
FV30 (S1) | 10.500 | 1.404 | 7.263 | 13.737 | A |
FV60 (S3) | 10.500 | 1.404 | 7.263 | 13.737 | A |
FV60 (S1) | 10.220 | 0.810 | 8.351 | 12.089 | A |
FV60 (S2) | 10.160 | 1.404 | 6.923 | 13.397 | A |
FV30 (S2) | 10.053 | 0.810 | 8.185 | 11.922 | A |
FV60 (S3) | 9.830 | 1.404 | 6.593 | 13.067 | A |
T (S3) | 9.830 | 0.992 | 7.541 | 12.119 | A |
T (S1) | 9.745 | 0.992 | 7.456 | 12.034 | A |
FV30 (S3) | 9.165 | 0.992 | 6.876 | 11.454 | A |
FV30 (S3) | 9.160 | 1.404 | 5.923 | 12.397 | A |
FV60 (S3) | 9.000 | 1.404 | 5.763 | 12.237 | A |
T (S2) | 8.665 | 0.992 | 6.376 | 10.954 | A |
T (S1) | 8.330 | 1.404 | 5.093 | 11.567 | A |
FV30 (S1) | 8.330 | 1.404 | 5.093 | 11.567 | A |
FV60 (S2) | 8.000 | 1.404 | 4.763 | 11.237 | A |
T (S3) | 7.660 | 1.404 | 4.423 | 10.897 | A |
T (S2) | 7.000 | 1.404 | 3.763 | 10.237 | A |
Annex 2
Modality | Moyenneestimée | Groups | |
|---|---|---|---|
S1F1 | 39.247 | A | |
S1F2 | 38.277 | A | |
S2F1 | 35.890 | A | |
S2F2 | 35.220 | A | |
S1F0 | 29.277 | A | B |
S2F0 | 29.220 | A | B |
S3F1 | 28.167 | A | B |
S3F2 | 27.330 | A | B |
S3F0 | 23.223 | B | |
Annex 3
Modality | Average | Standard error | Bottom (95%) | Upper terminal (95%) | Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV60 (S2) | 78.000 | 3.021 | 71.034 | 84.966 | A | ||
FV60 (S1) | 71.000 | 1.744 | 66.978 | 75.022 | A | B | |
FV60 (S3) | 70.000 | 3.021 | 63.034 | 76.966 | A | B | |
FV30 (S1) | 70.000 | 3.021 | 63.034 | 76.966 | A | B | |
FV30 (S1) | 70.000 | 3.021 | 63.034 | 76.966 | A | B | |
FV30 (S2) | 70.000 | 1.744 | 65.978 | 74.022 | A | B | |
T (S1) | 69.500 | 2.136 | 64.574 | 74.426 | A | B | |
FV30 (S1) | 67.000 | 3.021 | 60.034 | 73.966 | A | B | |
FV60 (S3) | 67.000 | 3.021 | 60.034 | 73.966 | A | B | |
FV60 (S2) | 65.000 | 3.021 | 58.034 | 71.966 | A | B | |
FV60 (S2) | 64.000 | 3.021 | 57.034 | 70.966 | A | B | |
T (S1) | 64.000 | 3.021 | 57.034 | 70.966 | A | B | |
T (S2) | 62.000 | 2.136 | 57.074 | 66.926 | A | B | |
FV30 (S3) | 59.000 | 2.136 | 54.074 | 63.926 | B | ||
T (S3) | 57.000 | 3.021 | 50.034 | 63.966 | B | ||
T (S2) | 56.000 | 3.021 | 49.034 | 62.966 | B | ||
FV30 (S3) | 53.000 | 3.021 | 46.034 | 59.966 | B | ||
FV60 (S3) | 53.000 | 3.021 | 46.034 | 59.966 | B | C | |
T (S3) | 42.500 | 2.136 | 37.574 | 47.426 | C | ||
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Masmoudi, A., Masmoudi, A., Miloudi, B. (2022). Effect of Irrigation Water Salinity on Wheat (Triticum durum) Stem Height in the Presence of Organic Matter. In: Heggy, E., Bermudez, V., Vermeersch, M. (eds) Sustainable Energy-Water-Environment Nexus in Deserts. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76081-6_81
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76081-6_81
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76080-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76081-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)