Skip to main content

Understanding the Intertemporal Choice: A Methodological Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Economics: Minds, Machines, and their Society (DECON 2020)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 990))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 387 Accesses

Abstract

This paper reviews the existing literature on the intertemporal choice from a methodological perspective. After a summary of the neoclassical model with its inaccuracies and controversies, the paper introduces the concept of present bias presented through time discounting research. It investigates differences in the relative evaluation and decisions made over some type of utility, generally money or goods, at different points in time by comparing the evaluation at an earlier date with one for a later date. Specifically, the hyperbolic discounting model is put forth again as well as the various standard types of present-focused models are analyzed. Furthermore, the paper discusses the recent evidence on commitment devices, how this evidence relates to theoretical questions about the demand for, and effectiveness of, commitment. An earlier generalization of the discounted utility model implied that people’s intertemporal marginal rate of substitution would diverge depending on the stretch of time a choice was made: This would give rise to a preference for commitment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ramsey, F.P.: A mathematical theory of saving. Econ. J. 38(152), 543–559 (1928)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Samuelson, P.A.: A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econ. Stud. 4(2), 155–161 (1937)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D.: Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Q. J. Econ. 107(2), 573–597 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thaler, R.: Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econ. Lett. 8(3), 201–207 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laibson, D.: Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q. J. Econ. 112(2), 443–478 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ericson, K.M., Laibson, D.: Intertemporal choice, Chap. 1, vol. 2, pp. 1–68. Elsevier (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. O’Donoghue, T., Rabin, M.: Doing it now or later. Am. Econ. Rev. 89(1), 103–124 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laibson, D.: Intertemporal decision making. In: Nadel, L. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laibson, D.: A cue-theory of consumption*. Q. J. Econ. 116(1), 81–119 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Thaler, R.H., Shefrin, H.M.: An economic theory of self-control. J. Polit. Econ. 89(2), 392–406 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fudenberg, D., Levine, D.K.: A dual-self model of impulse control. Am. Econ. Rev. 96(5), 1449–1476 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zauberman, G., Kim, B.K., Malkoc, S.A., Bettman, J.R.: Discounting time and time discounting: subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. J. Mark. Res. 46(4), 543–556 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Read, D.: Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? J. Risk Uncertain. 23(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubinstein, A.: “Economics and psychology”? The case of hyperbolic discounting. Int. Econ. Rev. 44(4), 1207–1216 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gabaix, X., Laibson, D.: Myopia and discounting. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malmendier, U., Della Vigna, S.: Paying not to go to the gym. Am. Econ. Rev. 96(3), 694–719 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ariely, D., Wertenbroch, K.: Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: self-control by precommitment. Psychol. Sci. 13(3), 219–224 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, J.J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.C.: 100 bills on the sidewalk: suboptimal investment in 401 (k) plans. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93(3), 748–763 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carroll, G.D., Choi, J.J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.C., Metrick, A.: Optimal defaults and active decisions. Q. J. Econ. 124(4), 1639–1674 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi, J.J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.C., Metrick, A.: Defined contribution pensions: plan rules, participant choices, and the path of least resistance. Tax Policy Econ. 16, 67–113 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi, J.J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.C., Metrick, A.: For better or for worse: default effects and 401 (k) savings behavior. In: Perspectives on the Economics of Aging, pp. 81–126. University of Chicago Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Lafratta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lafratta, M. (2021). Understanding the Intertemporal Choice: A Methodological Review. In: Bucciarelli, E., Chen, SH., Corchado, J.M., Parra D., J. (eds) Decision Economics: Minds, Machines, and their Society. DECON 2020. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 990. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75583-6_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics