Skip to main content

Abstract

Electronic fetal monitoring refers to the use of medical equipment that has the ability to detect, record, analyse and present the records of the fetal heart rate changes with time. It is used in current practice to monitor the fetal heart rate when there is concern that fetal hypoxia may occur. The commonest form is the CardioTocoGraphy. The basic features of the CardioTocoGraphy are the baseline fetal heart rate, the baseline variability, acceleration, deceleration and the tocogram/uterine contraction. A combination of these basic features gives the diagnosis when it is performed.

The physiological regulation of the fetal heart rate and the factors affecting these, causes of abnormal fetal heart rates, indication for the antenatal and intrapartum cardiotocography, normal and abnormal features, clinical implications of the findings and the management options following abnormal findings are discussed. In addition, the procedure for its conduct and guidelines for deployment in Low and Middle Income Countries is proposed. It is stressed that CardioTocoGraphy is a screening tool and not diagnostic and there is need for training and retraining to obtain optimum benefit of its diagnostic potential while limiting its drawbacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kubli FW, Hon EH, Khazin AF, Takemura H. Observations on heart rate and pH in the human foetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;104(8):1190–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haverkamp AD, Thompson HE, McFee JG, Cetrulo C. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;125(3):310–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelso IM, Parsons RJ, Lawrence GF, Arora SS. An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor.A randomised trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;131(5):526–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haverkamp AD, Orleans M, Langendoerfer S, McFee J, Murphy J, Thompson HE. A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134(4):399–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira M, Boylan P, Chalmers L. The Dublin randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;152(5):524–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thacker SB, Stroup D, Chang MH. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):Art. No.: CD000063. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000063.pub2.

  7. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development research planning workshop. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(6):1385–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. ACOG practice bulletin No. 106: intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stout MJ, Cahill AG. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present and future. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38(1):127–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, Byaruhanga R, Enabudoso E, Anthony J, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. IJGO. 2015;131(1):13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suwanrath C, Suntharasaj T. Sleep–wake cycles in normal fetuses. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 281:449-54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simpson KR, James DC. Efficacy of intrauterine resuscitation techniques in improving fetal oxygen status during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1362–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fawole G, Hofmeyr GJ. Maternal oxygen administration for fetal distress. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD000136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG, Nelson S, Roark M, Williams ML, et al. A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic fetal monitoring in 34,995 pregnancies. N Engl J Med. 1986;315(10):615–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Luthy DA, Shy KK, van Belle G, Larson EB, Hughes JP, et al. A randomised trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69(5):687–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shy KK, Luthy DA, Bennett FC, Whitfield M, Larson EB, et al. Effects of electronic fetal-heart-rate monitoring as compared with periodic auscultation, on the neurologic development of premature infants. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(9):588–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Blackwell SC, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Gyamfi BC. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-tier fetal heart rate interpretation system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:378.e1bs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ugwumadu A. Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation. BJOG. 2014;121:1063–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4:e98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa E, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, Byaruhanga R, EhighaEnabudoso JA, Mirza F, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. IJGO. 2015;131(1):13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Care and Health Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum Care for Healthy women and babies. 2014. Nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.

  • The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance.Clinical Guidelines. 2014.*.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehigha Enabudoso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Enabudoso, E. (2021). Electronic Fetal Monitoring. In: Okonofua, F., Balogun, J.A., Odunsi, K., Chilaka, V.N. (eds) Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology for Developing Countries . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75385-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75385-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75384-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75385-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics