Skip to main content

Robust Portfolio Optimization Models When Stock Returns Are a Mixture of Normals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI and Analytics for Public Health (INFORMS-CSS 2020)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 643 Accesses

Abstract

Using optimization techniques in portfolio selection has attracted significant attention in financial decisions. However, one of the main challenging aspects faced in optimal portfolio selection is that the models are sensitive to the estimations of the uncertain parameters. In this paper, we focus on the robust optimization problems to incorporate uncertain parameters into the standard portfolio problems. We provide reformulations of the robust versions of portfolio optimization problems under different uncertainty sets as conic programs with two risk measures: variance and Conditional Value-at-Risk under the assumption that the stock returns are a mixture of normals. Finally, we conduct a computational study on a real data set to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the robust optimization approaches. Our results suggest that employing robust models with budgeted uncertainty may provide higher returns for the same levels of risk, especially for investors inclined to take more risk, and the uncertainty in the covariance estimations does not have a significant impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arabacı, P. (2020). Comparison of robust optimization models for portfolio optimization. MS Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovski, A. (2001). Lectures on modern convex optimization: analysis, algorithms, and engineering applications. SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceria, S., & Stubbs, R. A. (2006). Incorporating estimation errors into portfolio selection: Robust portfolio construction. Asset Management (pp. 270–294). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceria, S., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2013). Portfolio optimization (pp. 429–464).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., & Yu, L. (2013). A novel nonlinear value-at-risk method for modeling risk of option portfolio with multivariate mixture of normal distributions. Economic Modelling, 35, 796–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, V., & Nogales, F. J. (2009). Portfolio selection with robust estimation. Operations Research, 57(3), 560–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaoui, L. El., Oks, M., & Oustry, F. (2003). Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach. Operations Research, 51(4), 543–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocuk, B., & Cornuéjols, G. (2020). Incorporating Black-Litterman views in portfolio construction when stock returns are a mixture of normals. Omega, 91, 102008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. Journal of Risk, 4, 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, M. S., & Boyd, S. (2000). The worst-case risk of a portfolio. Unpublished manuscript. Available from http://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/%7Emlobo/bio/researchfiles/rsk-bnd.pdf.

  • Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1443–1471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arabacı, P., Kocuk, B. (2022). Robust Portfolio Optimization Models When Stock Returns Are a Mixture of Normals. In: Yang, H., Qiu, R., Chen, W. (eds) AI and Analytics for Public Health. INFORMS-CSS 2020. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75166-1_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics