Abstract
Using optimization techniques in portfolio selection has attracted significant attention in financial decisions. However, one of the main challenging aspects faced in optimal portfolio selection is that the models are sensitive to the estimations of the uncertain parameters. In this paper, we focus on the robust optimization problems to incorporate uncertain parameters into the standard portfolio problems. We provide reformulations of the robust versions of portfolio optimization problems under different uncertainty sets as conic programs with two risk measures: variance and Conditional Value-at-Risk under the assumption that the stock returns are a mixture of normals. Finally, we conduct a computational study on a real data set to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the robust optimization approaches. Our results suggest that employing robust models with budgeted uncertainty may provide higher returns for the same levels of risk, especially for investors inclined to take more risk, and the uncertainty in the covariance estimations does not have a significant impact.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arabacı, P. (2020). Comparison of robust optimization models for portfolio optimization. MS Thesis.
Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovski, A. (2001). Lectures on modern convex optimization: analysis, algorithms, and engineering applications. SIAM.
Ceria, S., & Stubbs, R. A. (2006). Incorporating estimation errors into portfolio selection: Robust portfolio construction. Asset Management (pp. 270–294). Springer.
Ceria, S., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2013). Portfolio optimization (pp. 429–464).
Chen, R., & Yu, L. (2013). A novel nonlinear value-at-risk method for modeling risk of option portfolio with multivariate mixture of normal distributions. Economic Modelling, 35, 796–804.
DeMiguel, V., & Nogales, F. J. (2009). Portfolio selection with robust estimation. Operations Research, 57(3), 560–577.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39(1), 1–22.
Ghaoui, L. El., Oks, M., & Oustry, F. (2003). Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach. Operations Research, 51(4), 543–556.
Kocuk, B., & Cornuéjols, G. (2020). Incorporating Black-Litterman views in portfolio construction when stock returns are a mixture of normals. Omega, 91, 102008.
Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. Journal of Risk, 4, 43–68.
Lobo, M. S., & Boyd, S. (2000). The worst-case risk of a portfolio. Unpublished manuscript. Available from http://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/%7Emlobo/bio/researchfiles/rsk-bnd.pdf.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91 (1952).
Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1443–1471.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Arabacı, P., Kocuk, B. (2022). Robust Portfolio Optimization Models When Stock Returns Are a Mixture of Normals. In: Yang, H., Qiu, R., Chen, W. (eds) AI and Analytics for Public Health. INFORMS-CSS 2020. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75166-1_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75166-1_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75165-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75166-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)