Skip to main content

Narrative, Video Games, and Performance In Situ

Evaluating Learning Within Games and Implications for Research from a Literacy Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Game-based Learning Across the Disciplines

Abstract

All video games, by design, are oriented in the narrative. Some games exemplify a colloquial notion of narrative (e.g., MYST), while others seem less story-like (e.g., Tetris). From a literacy perspective, narrative extends beyond the story. Literacy, similarly, is more than discrete acts of listening, speaking, reading, or writing that is typically associated with narrative storytelling. Literacy, in its most inclusive and broad sense, involves the encapsulating, intertextual interactions between and among all modes of communication and their respective contexts. Literacy includes metacognitive skills, critical thinking skills, and social skills. More importantly, sociocultural influences and contexts undergird both games and literacy. Epistemologically, games are literacy events and researchers stand to benefit from understanding the ways the two domains are isomorphically related. This chapter is dedicated to establishing the relationship between the field of literacy and game-based learning. This relationship is demonstrated through a literacy definition of text, context, skills, and application (of literacy) as each applies to the games Super Mario Bros., The Deed, and World of Warcraft. From the perspective that learning is a process and that games serve as sites of application for literacy, several implications for research and practice are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 201–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Fernández, C., Calvo-Morata, A., Freire, M., Martínez-Ortiz, I., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2019). Applications of data science to game learning analytics data: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103612

  • Baek, Y. (2017). Game-based learning: Theory, strategies and performance outcomes. Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Gamification and serious games: A literature meta-analysis and integrative model. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play: Using games to position person, continent, and context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, T. W., Bean, S. K., & Bean, K. F. (1999). Intergenerational conversations and two adolescents' multiple literacies: Implications for redefining content area literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42(6), 438–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bediou, B., Adams, D. M., Mayer, R. E., Tipton, E., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2018). Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blizzard Entertainment. (2004). World of Warcraft. Activision Blizzard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1991). The one-literacy schoolhouse in the age of multiple literacies. Educational Horizons, 69(3), 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (1993). Towards new literacies, information technology, English and media education. The English and Media Magazine, 2025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbado, D. W., Crenshaw, K. W., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 303–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., Tanner-Smith, E., & Killingsworth, S. (2016). Digital games, design and learning: A systematic review and meta- analysis (executive summary). SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, N. (2018, September 27). World of Warcraft’s active subscriber count hits its highest point since 2014. PC Games Insider. Retrieved from https://www.pcgamesinsider.biz/news/67848/world-of-warcrafts-active-subscriber-count-hits-its-highest-point-since-2014/#:~:text=Blizzard%20hasn't%20released%20subscriber,release%20of%20Cataclysm%2C%20still%20stands

  • Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59, 661–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Gumperz, J., & Keller-Cohen, D. (1993). Alternative literacies in school and beyond: Multiple literacies of speaking and writing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24(4), 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas, S. (2018). Are games effective learning tools? A review of educational games. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, A. K. (2001). Understanding and using context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(1), 4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Soufi, N., & See, B. H. (2019). Does explicit teaching of critical thinking improve critical thinking skills of English language learners in higher education? A critical review of causal evidence. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 140–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasching-Varner, K., & Dodo-Seriki, V. (2012). Moving beyond seeing with our eyes wide shut: A response to “There is no culturally responsive teaching spoken here.” Democracy and Education, 20(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2008). Learning and games. The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning. In K. Salen (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur foundation series on digital media and learning (pp. 21–40). MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, C., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2013). Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? a meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabthegames Studios. (2015). The Deed. Grabthegames Studios.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society, 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiten, L. (2016). Digital literacy: An evolving definition. Education week.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrici, G., & Köster, L. (1987). Verfahren der Erklärung von lexikalischen Bedeutungen im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Zielsetzungen, Untersuchungsmethoden und erste Ergebnisse aus einem empirischen Projekt. Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen, 1(6), 25–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshbein, L. (2020, June). The zombie apocalypse and COVID-19. Academic Psychiatry, 17, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifenthaler, D., & Kim, Y. J. (Eds.). (2019). Game-based assessment revisited. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Campbell, J. P., & Davidson, M. E. (1994). Learning with media: Restructuring the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B. (1996). Electronic play worlds: Gender differences in children’s construction of video games. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructivism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 97–123). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F. (2009). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. In R. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (Vol. I, pp. 1–32). Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, E. B., & Copeland, S. R. (2011). What is literacy? The power of a definition. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3/4), 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. (1998). Multiple literacies and critical pedagogy in a multicultural society. Educational Theory, 48(1), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2019). Game-based assessment: The past ten years and moving forward. In D. Ifenthaler (Ed.), Game-based assessment revisited (pp. S.3–S.11). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition, 22(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., & Etopia, E. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2000). Mapping postmodern literacies: A preliminary chart. The Journal of Literacy and Technology, 1(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (Vol. 30). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasley, E. (2017). Twenty-first century literacy, game-based learning, and project-based learning. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 18(3), 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25(2), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Schrader, P. G. (2008). Where do we go now? Understanding research on navigation in complex digital environments. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of new literacies (pp. 267–296). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2017). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Education, 197(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkowski, J., & Russworm, T. M. (2017). Gaming representation: Race, gender, and sexuality in video games. Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the “digital society.”. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies concepts, policies, and practices (pp. 151–176). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2014). Computer Games for learning: An evidence-based approach. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2015). On the need for research evidence to guide the design of computer games for learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 349–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2010). Adding instructional features that promote learning in a game-like environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 241–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreery, M. P., Schrader, P. G., & Krach, S. K. (2011). Navigating massively multiplayer online games: Evaluating 21st century skills for learning within virtual environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(4), 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreery, M. P., Vallett, D., & Clark, C. (2015). Social interaction in a virtual environment: Examining socio-spatial interactivity and social presence using behavioral analytics. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreery, M. P., Schrader, P. G., Krach, K., Lafferiere, J. R., Bacos, C. A., & Fiorentini, J. P. (2019). Examining designed experiences: A walkthrough for understanding video games as performance assessments. In D. Ifenthaler & Y. J. Kim (Eds.), Game-based Assessment Revisited (pp. 105–119). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirra, N., & Garcia, A. (2020). I hesitate but I do have hope: Youth speculative civic literacies for troubled times. Harvard Educational Review, 90(2), 295–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshirnia, A., & Israel, M. (2010). The educational efficacy of distinct information delivery systems in modified video games. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(3), 383–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nintendo (1985). Super Mario Bros. Nintendō Kabushiki gaisha.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. A., Lawless, K. A., & Schrader, P. G. (2010). A taxonomy of educational games: Genres and applications. In Y. K. Baek (Ed.), Gaming for classroom-based learning: Digital role playing as a motivator of study (pp. 1–23). Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, A. N., Schultz, C. A., & Vaske, J. J. (2019). Engaging youth in public lands monitoring: opportunities for enhancing ecological literacy and environmental stewardship. Environmental Education Research, 25(9), 1386–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of Game-Based Learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plass, J. L., Perlin, K., & Nordlinger, J. (2010). The games for learning institute: Research on design patterns for effective educational games. Paper presented at the Game Developers Conference, San Fran-cisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Ivanova, C., Kingsley, T., & Mason, L. (2019). Three conceptions of literacy: media, narrative, and gaming literacies. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G. (2008). Learning in technology: Reconceptualizing immersive environments. AACE Journal, 16(4), 457–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G., Carroll, M. C., McCreery, M. P., & Head, D. L. (2020). Mixed methods for human-computer interactions research: An iterative study using Reddit and social media. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 818–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G., & Lawless, K. A. (2010). The Hidden literacies of massively multiplayer online games. In D. L. Pullen, C. Gitsaki, & M. Baguley (Eds.), Technoliteracy, discourse, and social practice: Frameworks and applications in the digital age (pp. 200–219). Information Science Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G., Lawless, K. A., & McCreery, M. (2009). Intertextuality in massively multiplayer online games. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (Vol. III, pp. 791–807). Information Science Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G., & McCreery, M. (2012). Are all games the same? Examining three frameworks for assessing learning from, with, and in games. In D. Ifenthaler, D. Eseryel, & X. Ge (Eds.), Assessment in game-based learning: foundations, innovations, and perspectives (pp. 11–28). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G., McCreery, M. P., Carroll, M. C., Head, D., & Lafferiere, J. R. (2019). Assessing learning from, with, and in games revisited: A heuristic for emerging methods and commercial-off-the-shelf games. In D. Ifenthaler & Y. J. Kim (Eds.), Game-based Assessment Revisited (pp. 13–35). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G., McCreery, M. P., & Vallett, D. B. (2017). Performance in situ. In Y. Baek (Ed.), Game-based Learning: Theory, Strategies and Performance Outcomes (pp. 421–437). Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (1999). Digital literacies: Renegotiating the visual and the verbal in communication. Prospect, 14(3), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K. D. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experiences. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K. D. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkuehler, C. (2005). The new third place: Massively multiplayer online gaming in American youth culture. Tidskrift Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 3, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkuehler, C. (2006). Why game (Culture) studies now? Games and Culture, 1(1), 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinkuehler, C. (2007). Massively multiplayer online gaming as a constellation of literacy practices. E-Learning and Digital Media, 4(3), 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for Language in Education. Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzby, E., & Teale, W. H. (1991). Emergent literacy. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 727–757). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teale, W. H., & Sulzby, E. (Eds.). (1986). Emergent literacy: writing and reading. Writing research: multidisciplinary inquiries into the nature of writing series. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1990). Talk about text: Where literacy is learned and taught. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(4), 369–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., & Van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., & Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, R., & Gardner, M. K. (2017). Handbook of research on serious games for educational applications. IGI Global.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by an ongoing collaboration among members of the Gayle A. Zeiter Literacy Development Center and the Interaction and Media Sciences Lab at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. G. Schrader .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schrader, P.G., Fasching-Varner, K.J., McCreery, M.P. (2021). Narrative, Video Games, and Performance In Situ. In: Aprea, C., Ifenthaler, D. (eds) Game-based Learning Across the Disciplines. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75142-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75142-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75141-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75142-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics