Skip to main content

Mononeuropathies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Electrodiagnostic Medicine
  • 937 Accesses

Abstract

Mononeuropathies, especially those seen with entrapment are among the most common conditions investigated with the use of electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies. These studies not only help to identify the single peripheral nerve involved, but also the site of the lesion, the type of fibers involved (sensory and/or motor), the character of the lesion (axonal vs. demyelinating), and the age/chronicity of the lesion. There is also the potential to obtain prognostic information, including features of ongoing reinnervation in axon loss lesions. The most distinctive localizing features occur with focal demyelination (as seen in many entrapment mononeuropathies). These include the presence of conduction block and/or focal conduction slowing, with or without concomitant axon loss features. However, these features may not always be found, and in some cases lesions are not able to be precisely localized with only findings of axonal loss on nerve conduction studies (NCS) and needle electromyography (EMG) in muscles innervated by the affected single nerve. However, knowledge of the anatomy of the course of individual peripheral nerves, and their branches which supply specific muscles allows the electromyographer to at least localize to a particular segment of the nerve in most cases.

In the upper extremity, the most common mononeuropathies include median neuropathy at the wrist (carpal tunnel syndrome), and ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. In the lower extremity, it is peroneal (fibular) neuropathy at the fibular head.

Causes of mononeuropathies include mechanical injury caused by compression or trauma like fractures or joint dislocations, repetitive activities like those seen in typists or carpenters, endocrine disorders like diabetes and hypothyroidism, local tumors like Schwannomas, pregnancy, prolonged limb posture during surgical procedures, among many others.

Most mononeuropathies involve sensory and motor fibers (potentially affecting corresponding sensory and motor responses on NCS), but some are purely motor including the anterior interosseus neuropathy, posterior interosseus neuropathy, long thoracic neuropathy and spinal accessory neuropathy. Others may be purely sensory, like lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy (meralgia paresthetica), and superficial radial sensory neuropathy (cheiralgia paresthetica).

The EDX study is also very helpful to differentiate between mononeuropathies and other patterns of injury affecting the peripheral nervous system including radiculopathies, plexopathies, and polyneuropathies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sternbach G. The carpal tunnel syndrome. J Emerg Med. 1999;17(3):519–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen P-C. A Bayesian network meta-analysis: comparing the clinical effectiveness of local corticosteroid injections using different treatment strategies for carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskel Disord. 2015;16:363. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0815-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Newington L. Carpal tunnel syndrome and work. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29:440e453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasiliadis HS. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 10(12):e0143683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143683.

  5. Ellis R. Is there a relationship between impaired median nerve excursion and carpal tunnel syndrome? A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2017;30:3e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yi-Ming Ren MD. Efficacy, safety, and cost of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Medicine. 2016;95:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yunoki M. Importance of recognizing carpal tunnel syndrome for neurosurgeons: a review. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017;57:172–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim YH. Median nerve mobilization techniques in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2017;30:397e406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bekhet AH. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;32:1439–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hermiz SJ. Evidence-based medicine: current evidence in the diagnosis and management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ballestero-Pérez R. Effectiveness of nerve gliding exercises on carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Therap. 2017;40(1).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mediouni Z. Is carpal tunnel syndrome related to computer exposure at work?. JOEM. 2014;56(2).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smeraglia F. Endoscopic cubital tunnel release: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2015;116:155–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldv049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jonathan Robert Staples MD. Cubital tunnel syndrome: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25:e215–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren Y-M. Open versus endoscopic in situ decompression in cubital tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016;35:104e110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson JC. Common fibular nerve compression anatomy, symptoms, clinical evaluation, and surgical decompression. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2016;33:283–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bregman PJ. Current diagnosis and treatment of superficial fibular nerve injuries and entrapment. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2016;33:243–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Doneddu PE. Tarsal tunnel syndrome: still more opinions than evidence. Status of the art. Neurol Sci. 2017;38:1735–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3039-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tladi MJ. Schwannoma and neurofibroma of the posterior tibial nerve presenting as tarsal tunnel syndrome: review of the literature with two case reports. Foot. 2017;32:22–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Casazza GC. Systematic review of facial nerve outcomes after middle fossa decompression and transmastoid decompression for bells’s palsy with complete facial paralysis. Otol Neurol. 2018;39:1311–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicholas S. Andresen. Facial nerve decompression. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;26:280–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramon Lugo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lugo, R., Soriano, A. (2021). Mononeuropathies. In: Galvez-Jimenez, N., Soriano, A., Morren, J.A. (eds) Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74997-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74997-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74996-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74997-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics