Skip to main content

Rethinking Accusation: Comparing Two Formative Restorative Justice Promises

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparative Restorative Justice
  • 636 Accesses

Abstract

The first chapter of this volume returns to two early promises of the restorative justice movement that have fallen by the wayside in current socio-cultural and political environments. First, a formative promise was to divert neighbourhood social harm from state-based criminal justice institutions to pursue conflict resolution within communities—sometimes with overtures toward decolonizing concepts. Secondly, the early promise of a paradigm shift in justice thinking was to recast dispute resolution techniques beyond narrow ideas of crime, individual culpability, and punishment. Restorative justice was to distinguish itself from individually centred crime control by focusing on transforming social relations that resulted in conflict. Rekindling such promises in light of restorative critiques of criminal justice and engaging with the pivotal role that accusatory practices play in sustaining criminalization, the discussion examines what these promises might mean for legally plural contexts. Through a comparison of promise, practical effect, and future revitalization, it argues that restorative justice should embrace new forms of accusation to divert individuals facing criminal accusations, and to transform intersectional social relations that produce harm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Records for this case were consulted at the Provincial Archives of Alberta: ‘R v. John Sunday (Break and Enter)’, 1888. GR1983.0001 Box 1/4.

References

  • Aertsen, I. (2017). Recalibrating victimhood through restorative justice: Perspectives from Europe. Restorative Justice, 5(3), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2017.1390997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aertsen, I., & Pali, B. (2017). Critical restorative justice. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, M., Borrows, J., & Tully, J. (Eds.). (2018). Resurgence and reconciliation: Indigenous-settler relations and earth teachings. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, A. (2002). Responsibilities, rights and restorative justice. The British Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, J. (1984). Justice without law? Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazemore, S. G., & Schiff, M. (Eds.). (2001). Restorative community justice: Repairing harm and transforming communities. Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, L. (2013). In R. J. Ross (Ed.), Legal pluralism and empires, 1500–1850. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, H. (2008). Crime, aboriginality and the decolonisation of justice. Hawkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrows, J. (2002). Recovering Canada: The resurgence of indigenous law. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrows, J. (2010). Canada’s indigenous constitution. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrows, J. (2016). Freedom and indigenous constitutionalism. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1987). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 805–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2009). The culture of punishment : Prison, society, and spectacle/Michelle Brown (p. c2009). New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, W. F. (2015). The great lone land: A narrative of travel and adventure in the north west of America. Forgotten Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavafy, C. P. (2009). C. P. Cavafy: Collected poems. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. The British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (2013). Crime control as industry. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (2015). Widening the net. Restorative Justice, 3(1), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2015.1049876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, J. M. (2004). Waiting for the barbarians. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment, and classification. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (2015). On intersectionality: The essential writings of Kimberle Crenshaw. New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. W. (2011). From private violence to mass incarceration: Thinking Intersectionally about women, race, and social control. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1418–1473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., & Hoyle, C. (2010). Debating restorative justice. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., & Tauri, J. (2016). Indigenous criminology. Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (2002). Restorative justice: The real story. Punishment & Society, 4(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740222228464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (2003). Mind the gap: Restorative justice in theory and practice (pp. 219–236). Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. (2003). Are Prisons Obsolete? Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y., & Rodriguez, D. (2000). The challenge of prison abolition: A conversation. Social Justice, 27(3 (81)), 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R. A., Lindsay, F., Marshall, S. E., Renzo, M., & Tadros, V. (Eds.). (2014). Criminalization: The political morality of the criminal law (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzur, A. W., & Olson, S. M. (2004). The value of community participation in restorative justice. Journal of Social Philosophy, 35(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2004.00218.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emsley, C. (2010). The great British Bobby: A history of British policing from 1829 to the present. Reprint edition. Quercus Publishing Plc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2018). The will to punish. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980). The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …. Law & Society Review, 15(3/4), 631. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, P. (2001). Modernism and the grounds of law. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, J. (2014). The invention of murder: How the Victorians Revelled in death and detection and created modern crime. Illustrated edition. St. Martin’s Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, H. (1995). British Columbia: Legal Instutitions in the far west, from contact to 1871. Manitoba Law Journal, 23, 293–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrielides, T. (2011). Restorative practices: From the early societies to the 1970s. Internet Journal of Criminology. Retrieved November 3, 2020. ISSN 2045-6743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrielides, T. (Ed.). (2014a). A victim-led criminal justice system: Addressing the paradox. Independent Academic Research Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrielides, T. (2014b). Bringing race relations into the restorative justice debate: An alternative and personalized vision of “the other”. Journal of Black Studies, 45(3), 216–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934714526042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrielides, Theo, and Vasso Artinopoulou. 2016. Reconstructing restorative justice philosophy.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harring, S. L. (1998). White Man’s law: Native people in nineteenth-century Canadian jurisprudence (1st ed.). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. G. (2016). Indigenous restorative justice: Approaches, Meaning & Possibility. University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 67, 313–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husak, D. (2009). Overcriminalization: The limits of the criminal law. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, G. (Ed.). (2003). A restorative justice reader: Texts, sources, context. Willan Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, G. (2013). Restorative justice: Ideas, values. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. W. (2013). Handbook of restorative justice. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. I. (2018). The limits of blame: Rethinking punishment and responsibility. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd-Hewett, D., & Osborne, R. (Eds.). (1995). Crime and the media: The post-modern spectacle. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krygier, M. (2008). The rule of law: Legality, teleology, sociology. SSRN Scholarly Paper. ID 1218982. Social Science Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krygier, M. (2018). Why the rule of law matters. Jurisprudence, 9(1), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2017.1331633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lagasnerie, G. (2018). Judge and punish: The penal state on trial. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, S. (2018). In your Defence: Stories of life and law. Doubleday UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Reform Commission of Canada. (1977). Diversion. Minister of Supply and Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzon, G. (2016). Challenges shared by restorative justice and strict liability in the absence of Mens Rea. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 19(4), 577–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, N. (2012). Youth justice in New Zealand. Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, R C. (1976). The North West Mounted Police and Law Enforcement, 1873–1905. 1st ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maratea, R. J., & Monahan, B. A. (2013). Crime control as mediated spectacle: The institutionalization of Gonzo rhetoric in modern media and politics: Gonzo rhetoric. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. F. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. (Ed.). (1988). Informal justice? Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law and Society Review, 22(5), 869–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. E., & Milner, N. (Eds.). (1993). The possibility of popular justice: Case study of community mediation in the United States. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P., & Tauri, J. M. (2016). Māori, family group conferencing and the mystifications of restorative justice. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1135496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoleon, V. (2010). Behind the blockades. Indigenous Law Journal, 9, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettelbeck, A., Smandych, R., Knafla, L. A., & Foster, R. (2016). Fragile settlements: Aboriginal peoples, law, and resistance in south-West Australia and prairie Canada. UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, R. (2019). Theft is property!: Dispossession and critical theory. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (1996). Justice fragmented: Mediating community disputes under postmodern conditions. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (2005). Governing paradoxes of restorative justice. Glass House Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (2009). The subjects of criminal identification. Punishment & Society, 11(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (2018a). Captive habits of criminalization. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 492–513. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (2018b). Criminal accusation: Political rationales and socio-legal practices. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (2018c). Transforming powers and restorative justice, Chapter 30. In T. Gavrielides (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of restorative justice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (2019). Accusatory entryways to criminal justice, Chapter 1. In Entryways to criminal justice: Accusation and criminalization in Canada. The University of Alberta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G., & Unger, M. P. (Eds.). (2019). Entryways to criminal justice: Accusation and criminalization in Canada. The University of Alberta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, U. E. (2020). Criminalization of young black males. Cultural Encounters, Conflicts, and Resolutions, 4(1), Article 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J. (2019). Bad law: Rethinking justice for a postcolonial Canada. Rocky Mountain Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, F. F. (2015). The role of community in restorative justice. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, V. (2011). An abolitionist view of restorative justice. International Journal of Law Crime and Justice, 39(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander, F. (1976). Varieties of dispute processing. Federal Rules Decisions, 70, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, F. (1990). ADR explosion, perfection and institutionalization. ABA/Dispute Resolution, 26, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Colledge, E., Dignan, J., Howes, M., Johnstone, J., Robinson, G., & Sorsby, A. (2006). Situating restorative justice within criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), 505–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480606068876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shonholtz, R. (1984). Neighborhood justice systems: Work, structure and guiding principles. Mediation Quarterley, 5, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shonholtz, R. (1988). Community as peacemaker: Making neighborhood justice work. Current Municipal Problems, 15, 291–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (2014). Mass incarceration on trial: A remarkable court decision and the future of prisons in America. The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, J. (2021). Police reform through a power lens. Yale Law Journal.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3731173

  • Skelton, A., & Sekhonyane, M. (2007). Human rights and restorative justice. In G. Johnstone & D. W. van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 580–597). Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snare, A., & Christie, N. (1975). Dialogue with Nils Christie. Issues in Criminology, 10(1), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, H., & Braithwaite, J. (Eds.). (2001). Restorative justice and civil society. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J. (2009). Restorative justice, gendered violence, and indigenous women. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tauri, J. M. (2009). An indigenous perspective on the standardisation of restorative justice in New Zealand and Canada. Indigenous Policy Journal, 20(3), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauri, J. M. (2016). Indigenous peoples and the globalization of restorative justice. Social Justice, 43(3), 46–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauri, J. M. (2020). ‘Indigenous Peoples and the Globalization of Restorative Justice’. Social Justice 43(3): 46–67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26405722.

  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, L. (2003). Repositioning restorative justice. Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitekamp, E. G. M., & Kerner, H.-J. (2012). Restorative justice: Theoretical foundations. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, C. (2012). The wild ride: A history of the north-west mounted police 1873–1904. Stanton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolford, A. (2019). Decriminalizing settler colonialism in Canada. In G. Pavlich & M. P. Unger (Eds.), Entryways to criminal justice: Accusation and criminalization in Canada (pp. 139–164). The University of Alberta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolford, A. J., & Ratner, R. (2008). Informal reckonings: Conflict resolution in mediation, restorative justice, and reparations. Routledge-Cavendish.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yar, M. (2012). Crime, media and the will-to-representation: Reconsidering relationships in the new media age. Crime, Media, Culture, 8(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659012443227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, H. (2015). Changing lenses: Restorative justice for our times. Herald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, H., MacRae, A., Pranis, K., & Amstutz, L. S. (2015). The big book of restorative justice: Four Classic Justice & Peacebuilding Books in one volume. Good Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zernova, M. (2007). Restorative justice: Ideals and realities. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Pavlich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pavlich, G. (2021). Rethinking Accusation: Comparing Two Formative Restorative Justice Promises. In: Gavrielides, T. (eds) Comparative Restorative Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74874-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74874-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74873-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74874-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics