Abstract
Latent variable models represent a useful tool in different fields of research in which the constructs of interest are not directly observable. In presence of many latent variables/random effects, problems related to the integration of the likelihood function can arise since analytical solutions do not exist. In literature, different remedies have been proposed to overcome these problems. Among these, the composite likelihoods method and, more recently, the dimension-wise quadrature have been shown to produce estimators with desirable properties. We compare the performance of the two methods in the case of longitudinal ordinal data through a simulation study and an empirical application. Both the methods perform similarly, but the dimension-wise quadrature results less computational demanding. Indeed, for the specific model under investigation, it involves integrals of smaller dimensions than those involved in the computation of the pairwise likelihood, with a better performance than the latter in terms of accuracy of the estimates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bianconcini, S., Cagnone, S., & Rizopoulos, D. (2017). Approximate likelihood inference in generalized linear latent variable models based on the dimension-wise quadrature. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 11, 4404–4423.
Cagnone, S., Moustaki, I., & Vasdekis, V. (2009). Latent variable models for multivariate longitudinal ordinal responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 401–415.
Cox, D. R., & Reid, N. (2004). A note on pseudolikelihood constructed from marginal densities. Biometrika, 91, 729–737.
Dunson, D. (2003). Dynamic latent trait models for multidimensional longitudinal data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 555–563.
Liu, Q., & Pierce, D.A. (1994). A note on Gauss-Hermite quadrature. Biometrika, 81, 624–629.
Lindsay, B. (1988). Composite likelihood methods. In N. U. Prabhu (Ed.), Statistical inference from stochastic processes (pp. 221–239). Providence: American Mathematical Society.
Huber, P., Ronchetti, E., & Victoria-Feser, M. P. (2004). Estimation of generalized linear latent variable models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 66, 893–908.
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects. Journal of Econometrics, 128, 301–323.
Schilling, S., & Bock, R. D. (2005). High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature. Psychometrika, 70, 533–555
Varin, C., & Vidoni, P. (2005). A note on composite likelihood inference and model selection. Biometrika, 92, 519–528.
Vasdekis, V., Cagnone, S., & Moustaki, I. (2012). A pairwise likelihood inference in latent variable models for ordinal longitudinal responses. Psychometrika, 77, 425–441.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bianconcini, S., Cagnone, S. (2021). Comparison Between Different Estimation Methods of Factor Models for Longitudinal Ordinal Data. In: Wiberg, M., Molenaar, D., González, J., Böckenholt, U., Kim, JS. (eds) Quantitative Psychology. IMPS 2020. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 353. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74772-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74772-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74771-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74772-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)