Skip to main content

Comparison Between Different Estimation Methods of Factor Models for Longitudinal Ordinal Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quantitative Psychology (IMPS 2020)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 353))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 910 Accesses

Abstract

Latent variable models represent a useful tool in different fields of research in which the constructs of interest are not directly observable. In presence of many latent variables/random effects, problems related to the integration of the likelihood function can arise since analytical solutions do not exist. In literature, different remedies have been proposed to overcome these problems. Among these, the composite likelihoods method and, more recently, the dimension-wise quadrature have been shown to produce estimators with desirable properties. We compare the performance of the two methods in the case of longitudinal ordinal data through a simulation study and an empirical application. Both the methods perform similarly, but the dimension-wise quadrature results less computational demanding. Indeed, for the specific model under investigation, it involves integrals of smaller dimensions than those involved in the computation of the pairwise likelihood, with a better performance than the latter in terms of accuracy of the estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bianconcini, S., Cagnone, S., & Rizopoulos, D. (2017). Approximate likelihood inference in generalized linear latent variable models based on the dimension-wise quadrature. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 11, 4404–4423.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cagnone, S., Moustaki, I., & Vasdekis, V. (2009). Latent variable models for multivariate longitudinal ordinal responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 401–415.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R., & Reid, N. (2004). A note on pseudolikelihood constructed from marginal densities. Biometrika, 91, 729–737.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dunson, D. (2003). Dynamic latent trait models for multidimensional longitudinal data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 555–563.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., & Pierce, D.A. (1994). A note on Gauss-Hermite quadrature. Biometrika, 81, 624–629.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, B. (1988). Composite likelihood methods. In N. U. Prabhu (Ed.), Statistical inference from stochastic processes (pp. 221–239). Providence: American Mathematical Society.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P., Ronchetti, E., & Victoria-Feser, M. P. (2004). Estimation of generalized linear latent variable models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 66, 893–908.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects. Journal of Econometrics, 128, 301–323.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, S., & Bock, R. D. (2005). High-dimensional maximum marginal likelihood item factor analysis by adaptive quadrature. Psychometrika, 70, 533–555

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Varin, C., & Vidoni, P. (2005). A note on composite likelihood inference and model selection. Biometrika, 92, 519–528.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vasdekis, V., Cagnone, S., & Moustaki, I. (2012). A pairwise likelihood inference in latent variable models for ordinal longitudinal responses. Psychometrika, 77, 425–441.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Bianconcini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bianconcini, S., Cagnone, S. (2021). Comparison Between Different Estimation Methods of Factor Models for Longitudinal Ordinal Data. In: Wiberg, M., Molenaar, D., González, J., Böckenholt, U., Kim, JS. (eds) Quantitative Psychology. IMPS 2020. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 353. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74772-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics