Skip to main content

Social Functioning and Decision Making: From Group to Individual Differences Across the Autism Spectrum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Making by Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Part of the book series: Positive Psychology and Disability Series ((POPD))

Abstract

In this chapter we describe research done by our group and others comparing the decision making of persons identified with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with controls. In this research a variety of tasks and measures were used to create a profile of similarities and differences between groups. In particular, the differences were related to dual process theories that separate intuitive versus deliberative processing of information in decision making and the “theory of mind” account of social deficits associated with autism.

In the latter parts of the chapter group differences were extended to individual differences related to the quality of social functioning using our newly developed index. This index was shown to be predictive of consumer decisions in areas such as social media usage. We then discuss how our inclusion of persons with ASD as a means of extending the range of social functioning ability beyond an unselected sample helped us better understand the role of that trait across the general population and how similar reasoning could be used to study other individual differences associated with different forms of disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Appelt, K. C., Milch, K. F., Handgraff, M. J. J., & Weber, E. U. (2011). The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision making research. Judgment and Decision making, 6, 252–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin, C., & Brosnan, M. (2020). The dual process theory of autism. In K. Morsanyi & R. M. J. Byrne (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning in autism. Psychology Press/Routledge series on Current Thinking and Reasoning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (2004). Omission bias, individual differences, and normality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. (1994). Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubely, E. (2001). The autism Spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, male and female, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorder, 31, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A. R., Damasio, H., & Damasio, S. W. (1994). Anderson insensitivity to future consequences following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, M., Chapman, E., & Ashwin, C. (2014). Adolescents with autism spectrum disorder show a circumspect reasoning bias rather than ‘jumping-to-conclusions’. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 44, 513–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, M., Lewton, M., & Ashwin, C. (2016). Reasoning on the autism spectrum: A dual process theory account. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorder, 46, 2115–2125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2742-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, K. (2020). Non-clinical autistic traits correlate with social and ethical but not with financial and recreational risk-taking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00360

  • DeMartino, B., Harrison, N. A., Knafo, S., Bird, G., & Dolan, R. (2008). Explaining enhanced logical consistency during decision making in autism. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10746–10750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London – Series B: Biological Sciences, 258, 459–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaeth, G. J., Levin, I. P., Jain, G., & Burke, E. V. (2016). Toward understanding everyday decision making by adults across the autism spectrum. Judgment and Decision making, 11, 537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. L. (2004). Evaluating the theory of executive dysfunction in autism. Developmental Review, 24, 189–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2004.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. A., Yechiam, E., Murphy, R. M., Queller, S., & Stout, J. C. (2006). Motivational processes and autonomic responsivity in Asperger’s disorder: Evidence from the Iowa gambling task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 668–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgement and choice. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I.P. (1999). Why do you and I make different decisions? Tracking individual differences in decision making. Presidential Address, Societry for Judgment and Decision making, Los Angeles, CA, November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., & Hart, S. S. (2003). Risk preferences in young children: Early evidence of differences in reaction to potential gains and losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision making, 16, 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Schreiber, J., & Lauriola, M. (2002). A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(1), 411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Bossard, E. A., Gaeth, G. J., & Yan, H. (2014). The combined role of task, child’s age and individual differences in understanding decision processes. Judgment and Decision making, 9, 274–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Foley-Nicpon, M., Yegorova, V., Cederberg, C., & Yan, H. (2015). Extending the study of decision making competence to special populations: A case study of persons on the autism spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I.P., Gaeth, G. J., Levin, A.M., Burke, E.V., & Chen, S. (2019). The risky decision making processes of high-functioning adults on the Autism Spectrum. Paper presented at the Subjective Probability, Utility and Decision making Conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, November 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Gaeth, G. J., Levin, A. M., & Burke, E. V. (2020a). Decision making processes of high-functioning adults on the autism spectrum. In K. Morsanyi & R. M. J. Byrne (Eds.), Thinking and reasoning in autism. Psychology Press/Routledge series on Current Thinking and Reasoning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A.M., Gaeth, G. J., Levin, I.P., Burke, E., & Chen, S. (2020b). Relating social skills and social media use to consumer behavior: An investigation across the autism spectrum. Manuscript available from authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindson, J. (2019). 75% of staff at this successful IT company are on the autism spectrum. Fast Company (online). My 7, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, L., Ring, H., Redley, M., & Watson, P. (2012). Decision making difficulties experienced by adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 16, 612–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2005). Decision making competence: External validation through an individual differences approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision making, 18, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.4813054-3067

  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. I. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (2007). Evaluating the theory-of-mind hypothesis of autism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 311–315. 128.255.47.255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toplak, M. E., & Weller, J. A. (2016). Individual differences in judgment and decision making: A developmental perspective. Psychological Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Cruys, S., Everts, K., Van der Hallen, R., Van Eylen, L., Boets, B., & de-Wit, L., & Wagemans, J. (2014). Precise minds in uncertain worlds: Predictive coding in autism. Psychological Review, 121, 649–675. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. U., Blais, A. R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision making, 15(4), 263–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., Rose, J. P., & Bossard, E. (2012). Assessment of decision making competence in preadolescence. Journal of Behavioral Decision making, 25(4), 414–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, J. A., Moholy, M., Bossard, E., & Levin, I. P. (2015). Pre-adolescent decision making competence predicts interpersonal strengths and difficulties: A two-year prospective study. Journal of Behavioral Decision making, 28, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1822

  • Zeif, D., & Yechiam, E. (2020). Autism is not associated with poor or enhanced performance on the Iowa gambling task: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, 113, 440–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Marketing Science Institute (F6786 - 4-1948) and the Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, for their support of this project and Benjamin Nedderman, Eleanor Burke, and Kerry Strum for their assistance in data collection. Special thanks to Itay Sisso, the Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, for his invaluable assistance in developing rules for identifying and eliminating “bot” respondents.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irwin P. Levin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Levin, I.P., Gaeth, G.J., Levin, A.M., Chen, S. (2021). Social Functioning and Decision Making: From Group to Individual Differences Across the Autism Spectrum. In: Khemka, I., Hickson, L. (eds) Decision Making by Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Positive Psychology and Disability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74675-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics