Skip to main content

A Human-Centered Design Procedure for Conceptualization Using Virtual Reality Prototyping Applied in an Inflight Lavatory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Abstract

For designing large-scale products like an airplane, engaging end-users in the concept phase is difficult. However, early user evaluation is important to choose the path which fits the user’s needs best. In particular, comfort-related assessments are difficult to conduct with digital models that are shown on a desktop PC application. Digital Human Modelling (DHM) plays a role in postural comfort analysis, while the subjective comfort feedback still largely relied on consulting with end-users.

This paper applies a human-centered design process and analyses the advantages and disadvantages of using VR prototypes for involving users during concept design. This study focused on using VR prototypes for concept selection and verification based on comfort assessment with potential end-users.

The design process started with an online questionnaire for identifying the quality of the design elements (Step 1 online study). Then, alternative concepts were implemented in VR, and users evaluated these concepts via a VR headset (Step 2 Selection study). Finally, the research team redesigned the final concept and assessed it with potential users via a VR headset (Step 3 Experience study).

Every design element contributed positively to the long-haul flight comfort, especially tap-basin height, storage, and facilities. The male and female participants had different preferences on posture, lighting, storage, and facilities. The final prototype showed a significantly higher comfort rate than the original prototypes.

The first-person immersion in VR headsets helps to identify the nuances between concepts, thus supports better decision-making via collecting richer and more reliable user feedback to make faster and more satisfying improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Merriam-Webster Homepage. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/comfort. Accessed 08 Feb 2021

  2. Vink, P., Bazley, C., Kamp, I., Blok, M.: Possibilities to improve the aircraft interior comfort experience. Appl. Ergon. 43(2), 354–359 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Richards, L.G.: On the psychology of passenger. Human Factors Transp. Res. 2, 15–23 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tao, Q., Kang, J., Sun, W., et al.: Digital evaluation of sitting posture comfort in a human-vehicle system under industry 4.0 framework. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 29, 1096–1103 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Torkashvand, G.: Optimization of cabin design for enhanced passenger experience(Doctoral dissertation). Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yao, X., Vink, P.: A survey and a co-creation session to evaluate passenger contentment on long-haul flight, with suggestions for possible design improvements to future aircraft interiors. In Proceedings of the International Comfort Congress. Delft University of Technology, Delft (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. van Eijk, D.J., Loth, M., Molenbroek, J.F.M.: Mock-up test of two train toilet modules. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Marek, T., (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, Louisville, KY, pp. 7575–7586 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunston, P.S., Arns, L.L., Mcglothlin, J.D., Lasker, G.C., Kushner, A.G.: An immersive virtual reality mock-up for design review of hospital patient rooms. In: Collaborative Design in Virtual Environments, pp. 167–176. Springer, Dordrecht (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Majumdar, T., Fischer, M.A., Schwegler, B.R.: Conceptual design review with a virtual reality mock-up model. In: Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, pp. 2902–2911. Springer, Montréal (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bordegoni, M., Colombo, G., Formentini, L.: Haptic technologies for the conceptual and validation phases of product design. Comput. Graph. 30(3), 377–390 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmed, S., Zhang, J., Demirel, O.: Assessment of types of prototyping in human-centred product design. In International Conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham, July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forbes, T., Barnes, H., Kinnell, P., Goh, Y.M.: A study into the influence of visual prototyping methods and immersive technologies on the perception of abstract product properties. In: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kano, N.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu (Quality J. Japan. Soc. Qual. Control) 14, 39–48 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reinhardt, R.: The outstanding jet pilot. Am. J. Psychiatry 127(6), 732–736 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuijt-Evers, L.F.M., Krause, F., Vink, P.: Aspects to improve cabin comfort of wheel loaders and excavators according to operators. Appl. Ergon. 34(3), 265–271 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukuizumi, M., Yamaguchi, T.: Automatic Faucet for Lavatory Unit of Aircraft. US; USOO7406722B2 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, M., Ganni, S., Ponten, J., Albayrak, A., Rutkowski, A.F., Jakimowicz, J. Analysing usability and presence of a virtual reality operating room (VOR) simulator during laparoscopic surgery training. In: 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), Atlanta, USA, pp. 566–572. IEEE, March 2020

    Google Scholar 

  18. Witmer, B.G., Jerome, C.J., Singer, M.J.: The factor structure of the presence questionnaire. Presence Teleop. Virtual Environ. 14(3), 298–312 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ihemedu-Steinke, Q.C., Erbach, R., Halady, P., Meixner, G., Weber, M.: Virtual reality driving simulator based on head-mounted displays. In: Automotive User Interfaces, pp. 401–428. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tregillus, S., Al Zayer, M., Folmer, E.: Handsfree omnidirectional VR navigation using head tilt. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 4063–4068. Association for Computing Machinery (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Ms. Xinhe Yao for her assistance in developing the VR prototyping and conducting the tests. The authors thank all the participants who shared their feedback about the prototyping and VR experience.

Funding

Meng Li’s doctoral research is sponsored by a grant from China Scholarship Council (CSC) (No. 201706280020). The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CSC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, M., Aschenbrenner, D., van Tol, D., van Eijk, D., Vink, P. (2022). A Human-Centered Design Procedure for Conceptualization Using Virtual Reality Prototyping Applied in an Inflight Lavatory. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 223. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74613-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74614-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics