Abstract
In the context of Industry 4.0, a human-robot collaborative assembly system is an example of a cyber-physical production system, where operators and robots interact during assembly. Considering the growing market and the increasing use of industrial collaborative robotics, companies need support in the proper and profitable introduction of this technology in their production environment. From a design standpoint, it is necessary to develop safe and ergonomic interactions between the operator and the system, primarily focusing on operators’ needs and characteristics of the robot. When designing collaborative systems and workstations, human-factors and cognitive requirements are often underestimated or ignored, even if they are crucial for the operator’s wellbeing and production performances. Considering this gap, the present work aims to evaluate cognitive ergonomics variables in human-robot collaborative assembly systems. Three different scenarios of human-robot collaboration have been developed based on the analysis of the scientific literature. The effectiveness of the scenarios has been validated through multiple experiments based on a laboratory case-study where operators physically interacted with a low-payload collaborative robot for the joint assembly of a workpiece. Multiple cognitive variables have been identified and evaluated by gradually changing the workstation elements as well as the conditions of human interaction with the robot. Preliminary results showed the impact of each scenario in reducing the operator’s stress and cognitive workload while improving the operator’s trust, acceptance, and situation awareness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gualtieri, L., Palomba, I., Wehrle, E.J., Vidoni, R.: Potential and challenges in SME manufacturing automation through safety and ergonomics in human-robot collaboration. In: Matt, D.T., Modrak, V., Zsifkovits, H. (eds.) Industry 4.0 for SMEs Challenges, Opportunities and Requirements, pp. 105–144. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2020)
Gualtieri, L., Rauch, E., Vidoni, R.: Emerging research fields in safety and ergonomics in industrial collaborative robotics: a systematic literature review. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 67, 101998
International Ergonomics Association (IEA): Human Factors/Ergonomics (2020). https://iea.cc/what-is-ergonomics/. Accessed Dec 2020
Thorvald, P., Lindblom, J., Andreasson, R.: CLAM–A method for cognitive load assessment in manufacturing. In: Advances in Manufacturing Technology, vol. XXXI, pp. 114–119 (2017)
Smart Mini Factory (2020). https://smartminifactory.it/. Accessed Dec 2020
Human Factors, Risk and Safety – Research Unit (2020). https://site.unibo.it/hfrs/en. Accessed Nov 2020
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)
De Visser, E.J., Peeters, M.M., Jung, M.F., Kohn, S., Shaw, T.H., Pak, R., Neerincx, M.A.: Towards a theory of longitudinal trust calibration in human–robot teams. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12(2), 459–478 (2020)
International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO 9241-11 — Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. (9241-11:2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html
Schwabe, H., Castellacci, F.: Automation, workers’ skills and job satisfaction. Plos One 15(11), e0242929 (2020)
Spector, P.E.: Organizational frustration: a model and review of the literature. Pers. Psychol. 31(4), 815–829 (1978)
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 319–340 (1989)
Recipe for Stress (2020). https://humanstress.ca/stress/understand-your-stress/sources-of-stress. Accessed Dec 2020
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 139–183. North-Holland (1988)
Rundmo, T., Hestad, H., Ulleberg, P.: Organisational factors, safety attitudes and workload among offshore oil personnel. Safety Sci. 29(2), 75–87 (1998)
Gualtieri, L., Rauch, E., Vidoni, R., Matt, D.T.: Safety, ergonomics and efficiency in human-robot collaborative assembly: design guidelines and requirements. Procedia CIRP 91, 367–372 (2020)
Universal Robots (2020). https://www.universal-robots.com/. Accessed Dec 2020
Robotiq (2020). https://robotiq.com/. Accessed Dec 2020
Smart Robots (2020). https://smartrobots.it/. Accessed Dec 2020
Weber (2020). https://www.weber-online.com/en/. Accessed Dec 2020
Rojas, R.A., Garcia, M.A.R., Wehrle, E., Vidoni, R.: A variational approach to minimum-jerk trajectories for psychological safety in collaborative assembly stations. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4(2), 823–829 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gualtieri, L., Fraboni, F., De Marchi, M., Rauch, E. (2022). Evaluation of Variables of Cognitive Ergonomics in Industrial Human-Robot Collaborative Assembly Systems. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 223. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74613-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74614-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)