Skip to main content

Negative Effect of External Human-Machine Interfaces in Automated Vehicles on Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour: A Virtual Reality Experiment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Abstract

Communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles is playing a key role in enhancing the safety of future traffic environment. The current study attempted to suggest new insights into designing external human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) in automated vehicles for traffic safety as examines negative effects of the eHMI on pedestrian crossing behaviour in a situation where an automated vehicle yields to pedestrian. Virtual Reality systems simulated three experimental conditions: baseline (no eHMI), showing “After you” and “I’ll stop” via eHMI on an automated vehicle in residential areas. The experiment using human participants resulted that conveying information via eHMI led pedestrians to do less careful exploratory behaviour toward other traffic. The result also showed the greater number of traffic collisions when the eHMI showed information compared to non-eHMI condition. The findings of this study are also being used to help how to design the eHMI on automated vehicles in shared spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE): Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, Standard J3016 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazilinskyy, P., Dodou, D., de Winter, J.: External human-machine interfaces: which of 729 colors is best for signaling ‘please (Do not) cross’?. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) on Proceedings, pp. 3721–3728. IEEE, Toronto (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rettenmaier, M., Schulze, J., Bengler, K.: How much space is required? Effect of distance, content, and color on external human–machine interface size. Information 11, 346 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bazilinskyy, P., Dodou, D., de Winter, J.: Survey on eHMI concepts: the effect of text, color, and perspective. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 67, 175–194 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisma, Y.B., van Bergen, S., ter Brake, S.M., Hensen, M.T.T., Tempelaar, W.J., de Winter, J.C.F: External human-machine interfaces: the effect of display location on crossing intentions and eye movements. Inf. (Switz.) 11(1), 13 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ackermann, C., Beggiato, M., Schubert, S., Krems, J.F.: An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: what is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? Appl. Ergon. 75, 272–282 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rettenmaier, M., Albers, D., Bengler, K.: After you?!—use of external human-machine interfaces in road bottleneck scenarios. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 70(2020), 175–190 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaleefathullah, A.A., Merat, N., Lee. Y.M., et al.: External human–machine interfaces can be misleading: an examination of trust development and misuse in a CAVE-based pedestrian simulation environment. Hum. Factors (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burns, C.G., Oliveira, L., Hung, V., Thomas, P., Birrell, S.: Pedestrian attitudes to shared-space interactions with autonomous vehicles - a virtual reality study. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 964, 307–316 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Clercq, K., Dietrich, A., Pablo, J., Velasco, N., de Winter, J., Happee, R.: External human-machine interfaces on automated vehicles: effects on pedestrian crossing decisions. Hum. Factors 61(8), 1353–1370 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dey, D., Walker, F., Martens, M., Terken, J.: Gaze patterns in pedestrian interaction with vehicles: towards effective design of external human-machine interfaces for automated vehicles. In: Proceedings - 11th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2019, pp. 369–378 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jieun Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lee, J., Daimon, T., Kitazaki, S. (2021). Negative Effect of External Human-Machine Interfaces in Automated Vehicles on Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour: A Virtual Reality Experiment. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 221. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_88

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_88

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74607-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74608-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics